How popular isGoogle Rich Results Test?
In September 2026, people searched for Google Rich Results Test by name about 33,100 times worldwide, a 49.1% increase from the previous year. These searches made up 45.4% of all global schema markup tool searches, placing Google Rich Results Test first out of nine tools. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about schema markup tools, Google Rich Results Test appeared in three of the five answers and was the third most recommended of the nine.
Google Rich Results Test is the most searched of 9 competitors and the third most recommended in AI answers.
- Google Rich Results TestShare of searches 45.4%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
Rank MathShare of searches 24.8%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st- Screaming Frog SEO SpiderShare of searches 24.8%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th
Schema AppShare of searches 2.2%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
Schema ProShare of searches 1.3%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
Follow Google Rich Results Test and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top schema markup tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Google Rich Results Test was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Google Rich Results Test is the third most recommended of the nine.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Rank Math4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Google Rich Results Test3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- TechnicalSEO.com Schema Markup Generator3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Schema App2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Schema Pro0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
WordLift0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
InLinks0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
WPSSO0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about schema markup tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which schema markup tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best schema markup tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best schema markup tool for a website?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“schema markup tool”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“schema markup generator”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which schema markup tools compete with Google Rich Results Test?
Share of searches by month for Google Rich Results Test, Rank Math, Screaming Frog SEO Spider, Schema App. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Google Rich Results Test | Rank Math | Screaming Frog SEO Spider | Schema App | Schema Pro | WordLift | TechnicalSEO.com Schema Markup Generator | InLinks | WPSSO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 30.5% | 37.3% | 24.9% | 2.2% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.07% |
| Nov 2025 | 30.7% | 37.4% | 25% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 0.04% | 0.01% | 0.07% |
| Dec 2025 | 32.5% | 39.6% | 21.6% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% |
| Jan 2026 | 35.2% | 35.2% | 23.5% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
| Feb 2026 | 33.4% | 33.4% | 27.4% | 2% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.17% | 0.02% | 0.04% |
| Mar 2026 | 35.9% | 29.4% | 29.4% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 0.1% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Apr 2026 | 36% | 29.5% | 29.5% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.04% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| May 2026 | 40.1% | 26.9% | 26.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 0.87% | 0.01% | 0.02% |
| Jun 2026 | 43.2% | 23.7% | 23.7% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 5.8% | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Jul 2026 | 40.3% | 22.1% | 22.1% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.95% | 12.1% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Aug 2026 | 45.5% | 24.9% | 24.9% | 2.2% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.12% | 0.01% | 0.04% |
| Sep 2026 | 45.4% | 24.8% | 24.8% | 2.2% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.12% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 45.4% | 33.1K | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 24.8% | 18.1K | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 24.8% | 18.1K | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 2.2% | 1.6K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 1.3% | 950 | -2.1% | 0 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 1.3% | 940 | +22.1% | +0.2 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 0.12% | 90 | 0% | 0 points | |
| 8, moved from 9th to 8th | 0.03% | 20 | +100% | 0 pointsmoved from 9th to 8th | |
| 9, moved from 8th to 9th | 0.03% | 20 | -33.3% | 0 pointsmoved from 8th to 9th |
45.4%
Held 1st. 33.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
24.8%
Held 2nd. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
24.8%
Held 3rd. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
2.2%
Held 4th. 1.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
1.3%
Held 5th. 950 estimated branded searches, -2.1% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
6.
WordLift1.3%
Held 6th. 940 estimated branded searches, +22.1% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
Held 7th. 90 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
8.
InLinks0.03%
Moved from 9th to 8th. 20 estimated branded searches, +100% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
9.
WPSSO0.03%
Moved from 8th to 9th. 20 estimated branded searches, -33.3% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Google Rich Results Test and its closest rivals
Google Rich Results Test vs Rank Math: compare popularity- Google Rich Results Test vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider: compare popularity
Google Rich Results Test vs Schema App: compare popularity
Google Rich Results Test vs Schema Pro: compare popularity
Google Rich Results Test vs WordLift: compare popularity- Compare Google Rich Results Test with any brand
Every comparison with Google Rich Results Test
6 comparisons
How has branded search demand for Google Rich Results Test changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
4 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Google Rich Results Test worldwide rose from 22.2K to 33.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Google Rich Results Test’s share of searches among schema markup tools worldwide increased from 30.5% to 45.4%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Google Rich Results Test’s share of searches among schema markup tools worldwide peaked at 45.5% in August 2026 and was lowest at 30.5% in October 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Google Rich Results Test rose from 2nd to 1st among schema markup tools worldwide.
How did search popularity change for schema markup tools worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, InLinks rose from 9th to 8th among schema markup tools worldwide.

In September 2026, WPSSO fell from 8th to 9th among schema markup tools worldwide.
Estimated monthly branded searches for TechnicalSEO.com Schema Markup Generator worldwide rose 200% over 12 measured months, from 30 to 90 in September 2026.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Google Rich Results Test worldwide rose 49.1% over 12 measured months, from 22.2K to 33.1K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Schema Pro worldwide fell 47.5% over 12 measured months, from 1.8K to 950 in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for WordLift worldwide fell 47.2% over 12 measured months, from 1.8K to 940 in September 2026.
How are Google Rich Results Test’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Google Rich Results Test’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- google rich results test
Who owns Google Rich Results Test?
Google Rich Results Test is owned by Google. Brandwave also tracks
AppSheet,
Chrome Remote Desktop,
Display & Video 360,
Firebase,
Fitbit,
Gemini,
Gmail, Google,
Google Ads,
Google Alerts,
Google Analytics,
Google Artifact Registry,
Google Authenticator,
Google Chat,
Google Chrome,
Google Chromecast,
Google Classroom,
Google Cloud, Google Cloud Dataflow, Google Cloud Identity,
Google Cloud Pub/Sub,
Google Cloud Run, Google Cloud Secret Manager, Google Cloud Speech-to-Text,
Google Cloud Storage,
Google Cloud Vertex AI,
Google Colab,
Google DeepMind, Google Display & Video 360,
Google Document AI,
Google Drive,
Google Earth Engine,
Google Family Link,
Google Forms,
Google Keep,
Google Keyword Planner,
Google Maps,
Google Maps Platform,
Google Meet,
Google Meridian,
Google Nest,
Google Nest Wifi, Google Project Management Certificate, Google Security Operations,
Google Slides, Google Tasks, Google Threat Intelligence,
Google Translate,
Google Vault,
Google Veo,
Google Workspace,
Looker,
Looker Studio,
Material Symbols,
NotebookLM, Snapseed,
TensorFlow Serving,
YouTube,
YouTube Music, YouTube Studio and
YouTube TV, owned by the same company, worldwide.
Do you work for Google Rich Results Test? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Google Rich Results Test your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.