Google Rich Results Test vs Schema App:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Google Rich Results Test had more branded searches than Schema App among schema markup tools worldwide. Google Rich Results Test had about 33,100 branded searches, while Schema App had 1,600. Google Rich Results Test made up 45.4% of all schema markup tool searches we track, and Schema App accounted for 2.2%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about schema markup tools, Google Rich Results Test appeared in three of the five answers and Schema App in two. Google Rich Results Test and Schema App were each mentioned first in two of the four answers.
Who do people search for more?
Google Rich Results Test, about 21 searches for every 1 for Schema App
Who does AI mention more?
Google Rich Results Test, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Schema App in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Each is named first in 2 of 4 answers.
Follow Google Rich Results Test vs Schema App and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top schema markup tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Google Rich Results Test was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Schema App was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Google Rich Results Test and Schema App were each listed first in two of the four answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Rank Math4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Google Rich Results Test3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- TechnicalSEO.com Schema Markup Generator3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Schema App2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Schema Pro0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
WordLift0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
InLinks0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
WPSSO0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about schema markup tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which schema markup tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best schema markup tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best schema markup tool for a website?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“schema markup tool”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“schema markup generator”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Google Rich Results Test or Schema App more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Google Rich Results Test and Schema App by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine schema markup tools we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Google Rich Results Test, Schema App. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Google Rich Results Test | Rank Math | Screaming Frog SEO Spider | Schema App | Schema Pro | WordLift | TechnicalSEO.com Schema Markup Generator | InLinks | WPSSO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 30.5% | 37.3% | 24.9% | 2.2% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.07% |
| Nov 2025 | 30.7% | 37.4% | 25% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 0.04% | 0.01% | 0.07% |
| Dec 2025 | 32.5% | 39.6% | 21.6% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% |
| Jan 2026 | 35.2% | 35.2% | 23.5% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
| Feb 2026 | 33.4% | 33.4% | 27.4% | 2% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.17% | 0.02% | 0.04% |
| Mar 2026 | 35.9% | 29.4% | 29.4% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 0.1% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Apr 2026 | 36% | 29.5% | 29.5% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.04% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| May 2026 | 40.1% | 26.9% | 26.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 0.87% | 0.01% | 0.02% |
| Jun 2026 | 43.2% | 23.7% | 23.7% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 5.8% | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Jul 2026 | 40.3% | 22.1% | 22.1% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.95% | 12.1% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Aug 2026 | 45.5% | 24.9% | 24.9% | 2.2% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.12% | 0.01% | 0.04% |
| Sep 2026 | 45.4% | 24.8% | 24.8% | 2.2% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.12% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
How has the Google Rich Results Test and Schema App comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Google Rich Results Test was ahead of Schema App in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Google Rich Results Test’s share of searches among schema markup tools worldwide moved from 30.5% to 45.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 22.2K to 33.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Schema App’s share of searches among schema markup tools worldwide held steady at 2.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1.6K.
How did search popularity change for schema markup tools worldwide in September 2026?
1 change
Estimated monthly branded searches for Google Rich Results Test worldwide rose 49.1% over 12 measured months, from 22.2K to 33.1K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Google Rich Results Test’s and Schema App’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Google Rich Results Test
1 branded search term
- google rich results test
Schema App
1 branded search term
- schemaapp
Other head-to-heads among schema markup tools

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.