How popular isBobcat in search?
In September 2026, there were an estimated 9.9K branded searches for Bobcat worldwide which is down 18.2% over the last 12 months. Bobcat holds 0.23% estimated Share of Search among plate compactor brands worldwide and is ranked 6th of 6 competitors for search popularity. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Milwaukee42.8%Husqvarna25.9%
Makita23.5%
Honda Power Equipment6.1%Mikasa1.4%
Bobcat0.23%
Follow Bobcat and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Where does Bobcat compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of Search | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plate compactor brands | 6th of 6 | 0.23% | Shown below |
| Compact tractor brands | 5th of 5 | 0.36% | Show ranking |
| Asphalt cutter brands | 4th of 4 | 0.41% | Show ranking |
| Zero turn mowers brands | 4th of 4 | 0.66% | Show ranking |
| Skid steer brands | 4th of 6 | 0.69% | Show ranking |
| Forestry mulcher brands | 3rd of 4 | 0.72% | Show ranking |
| Brush hog brands | 3rd of 3 | 0.72% | Show ranking |
| Tree spade attachment brands | 3rd of 3 | 0.72% | Show ranking |
| Mini excavators | 2nd of 6 | 2.5% | Show ranking |
| Excavator brands | 4th of 10 | 3.1% | Show ranking |
| Wheel loader brands | 3rd of 8 | 12% | Show ranking |
| Telehandlers | 2nd of 6 | 14.5% | Show ranking |
| Rotating telehandler brands | 1st of 4 | 39.3% | Show ranking |
| Mini telehandler brands | 1st of 3 | 45.8% | Show ranking |
| Telescopic handler brands | 1st of 3 | 45.8% | Show ranking |
Which plate compactor brands compete with Bobcat?
Share of Search by month for Milwaukee, Husqvarna, Makita, Honda Power Equipment, Bobcat. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of search table
| Month | Milwaukee | Husqvarna | Makita | Honda Power Equipment | Mikasa | Bobcat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 42.6% | 24.9% | 26.7% | 4.4% | 1.2% | 0.23% |
| Nov 2025 | 44.5% | 21.1% | 28.4% | 4.6% | 1.2% | 0.24% |
| Dec 2025 | 48.6% | 18.8% | 25.7% | 4.9% | 1.6% | 0.39% |
| Jan 2026 | 42.3% | 24.3% | 22.7% | 9.2% | 1.1% | 0.42% |
| Feb 2026 | 44% | 25.2% | 23.1% | 6.2% | 1.2% | 0.29% |
| Mar 2026 | 38.6% | 29.1% | 24.5% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 0.26% |
| Apr 2026 | 37.3% | 35.6% | 20% | 5.8% | 1% | 0.25% |
| May 2026 | 36.9% | 35.8% | 20% | 6.1% | 1% | 0.24% |
| Jun 2026 | 40% | 31.1% | 21.7% | 5.9% | 1.1% | 0.22% |
| Jul 2026 | 44.7% | 28% | 19.8% | 6.1% | 1.2% | 0.24% |
| Aug 2026 | 42.7% | 26.3% | 23.2% | 6.4% | 1.2% | 0.23% |
| Sep 2026 | 42.8% | 25.9% | 23.5% | 6.1% | 1.4% | 0.23% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 42.8% | 1.8M | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 25.9% | 1.1M | -1.9% | -0.4 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 23.5% | 1M | +1.1% | +0.3 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 6.1% | 262K | -4.7% | -0.3 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 1.4% | 60.5K | +22.2% | +0.3 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 0.23% | 9.9K | 0% | 0 points |
42.8%
Held 1st. 1.8M estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
25.9%
Held 2nd. 1.1M estimated branded searches, -1.9% vs prior month. Share -0.4 points.
3.
Makita23.5%
Held 3rd. 1M estimated branded searches, +1.1% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
6.1%
Held 4th. 262K estimated branded searches, -4.7% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
5.
Mikasa
1.4%
Held 5th. 60.5K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
6.
Bobcat0.23%
Held 6th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare search popularity between Bobcat and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Bobcat
29 comparisons
- Bobcat vs Kobelco
- Bobcat vs Sany
- Bobcat vs Sumitomo
- Bobcat vs Bosch
- Bobcat vs Case
- Bobcat vs Gehl
- Bobcat vs Hyundai Construction Equipment
- Bobcat vs John Deere
- Bobcat vs Kubota
- Bobcat vs Massey Ferguson
- Bobcat vs New Holland
- Bobcat vs Stihl
- Bobcat vs Toro
- Bobcat vs Genie
- Bobcat vs Honda Power Equipment
- Bobcat vs Husqvarna
- Bobcat vs Makita
- Bobcat vs Mikasa
- Bobcat vs Milwaukee
- Bobcat vs Manitou
- Avant Tecno vs Bobcat
- Bobcat vs Takeuchi
- Bobcat vs Yanmar
- Bobcat vs JCB
- Bobcat vs Merlo
- Bobcat vs Doosan
- Bobcat vs Caterpillar
- Bobcat vs Hitachi
- Bobcat vs Komatsu
How has branded search demand for Bobcat changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Bobcat worldwide fell from 12.1K to 9.9K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Bobcat’s estimated Share of Search among plate compactor brands worldwide held steady at 0.23%.
How did search popularity change for plate compactor brands worldwide in September 2026?
5 changes
Husqvarna’s estimated Share of Search among plate compactor brands worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 31.1% to 25.9% in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Honda Power Equipment worldwide rose 13.2% over 12 measured months, from 232K to 262K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Makita worldwide fell 28.5% over 12 measured months, from 1.4M to 1M in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Milwaukee worldwide fell 18.3% over 12 measured months, from 2.2M to 1.8M in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Bobcat worldwide fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 12.1K to 9.9K in September 2026.
How is Bobcat measured?
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Bobcat’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
1 branded search term
- bobcat digger
Do you work for Bobcat? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Bobcat your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.