How popular isInteractive Brokers?
In September 2026, people searched for Interactive Brokers by name about 688,000 times worldwide, an 18.6% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 7.7% of all global retail investing and trading app searches, placing Interactive Brokers fourth out of 11 apps. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about retail investing and trading apps, Interactive Brokers appeared in four of the five answers and was the fourth most recommended of the 11.
Interactive Brokers is the fourth most searched of 11 competitors and the fourth most recommended in AI answers.
Charles SchwabShare of searches 37.4%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
RobinhoodShare of searches 17.8%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
Trade RepublicShare of searches 11.2%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
Interactive BrokersShare of searches 7.7%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
FidelityShare of searches 6.3%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
Follow Interactive Brokers and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top retail investing and trading apps in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Interactive Brokers was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Interactive Brokers is the fourth most recommended of the 11.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Charles Schwab5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Robinhood5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Fidelity5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Interactive Brokers4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Webull3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Trade Republic0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Wealthsimple0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Trading 2120 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
eToro0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Freetrade0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about retail investing and trading apps
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which retail investing and trading app should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best retail investing and trading apps?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best retail investing and trading app for individual investors?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best investing app”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“trading app for beginners”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which retail investing and trading apps compete with Interactive Brokers?
Share of searches by month for Charles Schwab, Robinhood, Trade Republic, Interactive Brokers, Fidelity, Wealthsimple, Trading 212, eToro, Webull. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Charles Schwab | Robinhood | Trade Republic | Interactive Brokers | Fidelity | Wealthsimple | Trading 212 | eToro | Webull | Freetrade | Public |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 35.5% | 20.1% | 8.8% | 7.3% | 6% | 5.2% | 5.1% | 7.4% | 4.1% | 0.48% | 0.05% |
| Nov 2025 | 33.8% | 23.3% | 8.4% | 7% | 7% | 5% | 4.8% | 7% | 3.2% | 0.45% | 0.05% |
| Dec 2025 | 35.3% | 20.1% | 10.6% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 5.2% | 4.2% | 6.1% | 3.4% | 0.4% | 0.06% |
| Jan 2026 | 35.5% | 16.7% | 10.7% | 7.3% | 7.5% | 5.5% | 5.4% | 7.4% | 3.4% | 0.59% | 0.05% |
| Feb 2026 | 37.4% | 17.6% | 9.2% | 6.3% | 6.5% | 8.6% | 4.4% | 6.4% | 3% | 0.51% | 0.05% |
| Mar 2026 | 34.9% | 16.6% | 8.6% | 5.9% | 6% | 13.5% | 5.1% | 6% | 2.8% | 0.48% | 0.05% |
| Apr 2026 | 35.5% | 16.8% | 8.7% | 6% | 7.4% | 12.8% | 4.4% | 5% | 2.8% | 0.48% | 0.06% |
| May 2026 | 38.6% | 15.3% | 11.6% | 7.9% | 6.7% | 6.1% | 4.7% | 5.4% | 3.1% | 0.43% | 0.06% |
| Jun 2026 | 37% | 17.9% | 13.6% | 6.2% | 6.4% | 5.7% | 4.5% | 5.2% | 2.9% | 0.35% | 0.05% |
| Jul 2026 | 35.9% | 17.6% | 13.2% | 7.4% | 7.6% | 5.6% | 4.4% | 5.1% | 2.9% | 0.28% | 0.05% |
| Aug 2026 | 34.8% | 20.2% | 12.8% | 7.2% | 7.3% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 4.9% | 2.8% | 0.33% | 0.05% |
| Sep 2026 | 37.4% | 17.8% | 11.2% | 7.7% | 6.3% | 5.6% | 5.3% | 5.2% | 2.9% | 0.51% | 0.05% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 37.4% | 3.4M | 0% | +2.5 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 17.8% | 1.6M | -18.2% | -2.5 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 11.2% | 1M | -18% | -1.5 points | |
| 4, moved from 5th to 4th | 7.7% | 688K | -0.48% | +0.5 pointsmoved from 5th to 4th | |
| 5, moved from 4th to 5th | 6.3% | 565K | -19.3% | -1 pointsmoved from 4th to 5th | |
| 6, held 6th | 5.6% | 504K | -1.9% | +0.3 points | |
| 7, moved from 8th to 7th | 5.3% | 478K | +15.9% | +1 pointsmoved from 8th to 7th | |
| 8, moved from 7th to 8th | 5.2% | 471K | -0.31% | +0.3 pointsmoved from 7th to 8th | |
| 9, held 9th | 2.9% | 264K | -0.4% | +0.2 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.51% | 45.5K | +41.5% | +0.2 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 0.05% | 4.6K | -6.1% | 0 points |
37.4%
Held 1st. 3.4M estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +2.5 points.
17.8%
Held 2nd. 1.6M estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -2.5 points.
11.2%
Held 3rd. 1M estimated branded searches, -18% vs prior month. Share -1.5 points.
7.7%
Moved from 5th to 4th. 688K estimated branded searches, -0.48% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
5.
Fidelity6.3%
Moved from 4th to 5th. 565K estimated branded searches, -19.3% vs prior month. Share -1 points.
5.6%
Held 6th. 504K estimated branded searches, -1.9% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
5.3%
Moved from 8th to 7th. 478K estimated branded searches, +15.9% vs prior month. Share +1 points.
8.
eToro5.2%
Moved from 7th to 8th. 471K estimated branded searches, -0.31% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
9.
Webull2.9%
Held 9th. 264K estimated branded searches, -0.4% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
10.
Freetrade0.51%
Held 10th. 45.5K estimated branded searches, +41.5% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
11.
Public0.05%
Held 11th. 4.6K estimated branded searches, -6.1% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Interactive Brokers and its closest rivals

Interactive Brokers vs Charles Schwab: compare popularity
Interactive Brokers vs Robinhood: compare popularity
Interactive Brokers vs Trade Republic: compare popularity
Interactive Brokers vs Fidelity: compare popularity
Interactive Brokers vs Wealthsimple: compare popularity- Compare Interactive Brokers with any brand
Every comparison with Interactive Brokers
15 comparisons
- Charles Schwab vs Interactive Brokers
- Interactive Brokers vs Robinhood
- Interactive Brokers vs Trade Republic
- Interactive Brokers vs TradingView
- Fidelity vs Interactive Brokers
- Interactive Brokers vs Wealthsimple
- Interactive Brokers vs Trading 212
- eToro vs Interactive Brokers
- Interactive Brokers vs NinjaTrader
- Interactive Brokers vs Webull
- Interactive Brokers vs Thinkorswim
- Interactive Brokers vs Plus500
- Interactive Brokers vs MetaTrader
- Freetrade vs Interactive Brokers
- Interactive Brokers vs Public
How has branded search demand for Interactive Brokers changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Interactive Brokers worldwide fell from 845K to 688K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Interactive Brokers’ share of searches among retail investing and trading apps worldwide peaked at 7.9% in May 2026 and was lowest at 5.9% in March 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Interactive Brokers rose from 5th to 4th among retail investing and trading apps worldwide.
How did search popularity change for retail investing and trading apps worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Trading 212 overtook eToro to rank 7th among retail investing and trading apps worldwide, with 5.3% of the searches.

In September 2026, Charles Schwab gained share of searches among retail investing and trading apps worldwide, from 34.8% to 37.4%.

In September 2026, Robinhood lost share of searches among retail investing and trading apps worldwide, from 20.2% to 17.8%.

In September 2026, Trade Republic lost share of searches among retail investing and trading apps worldwide, from 12.8% to 11.2%.

In September 2026, Fidelity lost share of searches among retail investing and trading apps worldwide, from 7.3% to 6.3%.

In September 2026, Interactive Brokers rose from 5th to 4th among retail investing and trading apps worldwide.
How are Interactive Brokers’ branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Interactive Brokers’ name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- interactive brokers
- interactivebrokers
Do you work for Interactive Brokers? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does Interactive Brokers compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Online trading platforms | 3rd of 10 | 2.8% | Show ranking |
| Retail investing and trading apps | 4th of 11 | 7.7% | Shown above |

Is Interactive Brokers your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.