How popular isDuncan Cotterill?
In September 2026, people searched for Duncan Cotterill by name about 4,080 times in New Zealand, about the same as the previous year. These searches made up 18.1% of all New Zealand national and regional law firm searches, placing Duncan Cotterill first out of 11 firms. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about national and regional law firms, Duncan Cotterill appeared in three of the five answers and was the third most recommended of the 11.
Duncan Cotterill is the most searched of 11 competitors and the third most recommended in AI answers.
Duncan CotterillShare of searches 18.1%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
Chapman TrippShare of searches 12.9%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
Tompkins WakeShare of searches 12.2%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th
Bell GullyShare of searches 10.7%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
Lane NeaveShare of searches 9.7%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 6th
Follow Duncan Cotterill and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top national and regional law firms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Duncan Cotterill was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Duncan Cotterill is the third most recommended of the 11.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Duncan Cotterill3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Chapman Tripp3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Bell Gully3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Tompkins Wake2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Anderson Lloyd2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Lane Neave1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Holland Beckett1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Wynn Williams1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Cooney Lees Morgan1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Hesketh Henry1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about national and regional law firms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which national and regional law firm should I hire in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best national and regional law firms in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best national and regional law firm in New Zealand for a growing business?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“law firms nz”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“business lawyers nz”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 21, 2026.
Which national and regional law firms compete with Duncan Cotterill?
Share of searches by month for Duncan Cotterill, Chapman Tripp, Tompkins Wake, Bell Gully, Lane Neave, Anderson Lloyd, Holland Beckett, Wynn Williams, Cooney Lees Morgan, Hesketh Henry, Greenwood Roche. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Duncan Cotterill | Chapman Tripp | Tompkins Wake | Bell Gully | Lane Neave | Anderson Lloyd | Holland Beckett | Wynn Williams | Cooney Lees Morgan | Hesketh Henry | Greenwood Roche |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 18.2% | 11.1% | 11.8% | 11.2% | 9.8% | 8.1% | 9.4% | 7.6% | 4.6% | 4.8% | 3.5% |
| Nov 2025 | 17% | 12.5% | 11.3% | 10.5% | 9.2% | 9.2% | 9.9% | 7.2% | 5.6% | 4.4% | 3.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 14.8% | 13.2% | 13.3% | 10.5% | 8.2% | 9.7% | 8.3% | 7.4% | 5.5% | 5.7% | 3.3% |
| Jan 2026 | 17.5% | 10.4% | 11.6% | 13.3% | 8.1% | 7.7% | 9.1% | 8.9% | 5.5% | 5.1% | 2.7% |
| Feb 2026 | 16.3% | 12.1% | 12.4% | 12.2% | 8.8% | 8.9% | 9.6% | 8.2% | 4.2% | 4.4% | 3.1% |
| Mar 2026 | 16.3% | 12.4% | 9.4% | 12.4% | 10.8% | 10.7% | 6.4% | 8.4% | 3.7% | 5.7% | 3.8% |
| Apr 2026 | 19.7% | 11.9% | 9.9% | 11.9% | 9% | 8.6% | 7.8% | 8% | 5.3% | 4.2% | 3.8% |
| May 2026 | 19.1% | 11.4% | 11.5% | 14.2% | 8.6% | 8.2% | 7.1% | 7.7% | 3.9% | 4.1% | 4.2% |
| Jun 2026 | 18.5% | 10.9% | 11.6% | 11% | 9.7% | 7.9% | 9.5% | 7.5% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 3.4% |
| Jul 2026 | 18.5% | 11.1% | 11.4% | 11.1% | 8.5% | 9.6% | 8.1% | 7.6% | 6% | 4.6% | 3.4% |
| Aug 2026 | 20.6% | 12.2% | 11.7% | 10.2% | 9% | 8.8% | 7.7% | 7% | 5.4% | 4.2% | 3.2% |
| Sep 2026 | 18.1% | 12.9% | 12.2% | 10.7% | 9.7% | 9.3% | 8.2% | 7.3% | 4.4% | 3.9% | 3.3% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 18.1% | 4.1K | -16.9% | -2.5 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 12.9% | 2.9K | 0% | +0.7 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 12.2% | 2.8K | -1.1% | +0.5 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 10.7% | 2.4K | -0.41% | +0.5 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 9.7% | 2.2K | +1.9% | +0.7 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 9.3% | 2.1K | +0.48% | +0.5 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 8.2% | 1.9K | 0% | +0.4 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 7.3% | 1.6K | -1.2% | +0.3 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 4.4% | 1K | -23.1% | -1 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 3.9% | 890 | -11.9% | -0.3 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 3.3% | 750 | -2.6% | +0.1 points |
18.1%
Held 1st. 4.1K estimated branded searches, -16.9% vs prior month. Share -2.5 points.
12.9%
Held 2nd. 2.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.7 points.
12.2%
Held 3rd. 2.8K estimated branded searches, -1.1% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
10.7%
Held 4th. 2.4K estimated branded searches, -0.41% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
9.7%
Held 5th. 2.2K estimated branded searches, +1.9% vs prior month. Share +0.7 points.
9.3%
Held 6th. 2.1K estimated branded searches, +0.48% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
8.2%
Held 7th. 1.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
7.3%
Held 8th. 1.6K estimated branded searches, -1.2% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
4.4%
Held 9th. 1K estimated branded searches, -23.1% vs prior month. Share -1 points.
3.9%
Held 10th. 890 estimated branded searches, -11.9% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
3.3%
Held 11th. 750 estimated branded searches, -2.6% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
Compare popularity between Duncan Cotterill and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Duncan Cotterill
18 comparisons
- Chapman Tripp vs Duncan Cotterill
- Duncan Cotterill vs Tompkins Wake
- Bell Gully vs Duncan Cotterill
- Duncan Cotterill vs Lane Neave
- Anderson Lloyd vs Duncan Cotterill
- Duncan Cotterill vs Holland Beckett
- Duncan Cotterill vs Wynn Williams
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Duncan Cotterill
- Duncan Cotterill vs Hesketh Henry
- Duncan Cotterill vs Greenwood Roche
- Duncan Cotterill vs Gascoigne Wicks
- Duncan Cotterill vs Hardy-Jones Clark
- Duncan Cotterill vs Todd Walker
- AWS Legal vs Duncan Cotterill
- Duncan Cotterill vs Wain & Naysmith
- Duncan Cotterill vs Mactodd Lawyers
- Duncan Cotterill vs Lundons Law
- Duncan Cotterill vs Wisheart Macnab & Partners
How has branded search demand for Duncan Cotterill changed in New Zealand over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Duncan Cotterill in New Zealand held steady, from 3.9K to 4.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Duncan Cotterill’s share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand peaked at 20.6% in August 2026 and was lowest at 14.8% in December 2025.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand national and regional law firms in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Chapman Tripp gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 12.2% to 12.9%.

In September 2026, Lane Neave gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 9% to 9.7%.

In September 2026, Anderson Lloyd gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 8.8% to 9.3%.

In September 2026, Bell Gully gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 10.2% to 10.7%.

In September 2026, Tompkins Wake gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 11.7% to 12.2%.

In September 2026, Duncan Cotterill lost share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 20.6% to 18.1%.
How are Duncan Cotterill’s branded searches counted?
6 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Duncan Cotterill’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- Duncan Cotterill
- duncan cotterill blenheim
- duncan cotterill lawyers
- duncan cotterill nelson
- duncan cotterill queenstown
- duncancotterill
Do you work for Duncan Cotterill? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does Duncan Cotterill compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| national and regional law firms | 1st of 11 | 18.1% | Shown above |
| Queenstown law firms | 3rd of 9 | 15.3% | Show ranking |
| Blenheim law firms | 3rd of 7 | 18.6% | Show ranking |

Is Duncan Cotterill your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.