How popular isCooney Lees Morgan?
In September 2026, people searched for Cooney Lees Morgan by name about 1,000 times in New Zealand, about the same as the previous year. These searches made up 4.4% of all New Zealand national and regional law firm searches, placing Cooney Lees Morgan ninth out of 11 firms. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about national and regional law firms, Cooney Lees Morgan appeared in one of the five answers and was the eighth most recommended of the 11.
Cooney Lees Morgan is the ninth most searched of 11 competitors and the eighth most recommended in AI answers.
Duncan CotterillShare of searches 18.1%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
Chapman TrippShare of searches 12.9%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
Tompkins WakeShare of searches 12.2%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th
Bell GullyShare of searches 10.7%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
Cooney Lees MorganShare of searches 4.4%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 8th
Follow Cooney Lees Morgan and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top national and regional law firms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Cooney Lees Morgan was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Cooney Lees Morgan is the eighth most recommended of the 11.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Duncan Cotterill3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Chapman Tripp3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Bell Gully3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Tompkins Wake2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Anderson Lloyd2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Lane Neave1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Holland Beckett1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Wynn Williams1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Cooney Lees Morgan1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Hesketh Henry1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about national and regional law firms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which national and regional law firm should I hire in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best national and regional law firms in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best national and regional law firm in New Zealand for a growing business?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“law firms nz”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“business lawyers nz”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 21, 2026.
Which national and regional law firms compete with Cooney Lees Morgan?
Share of searches by month for Duncan Cotterill, Chapman Tripp, Tompkins Wake, Bell Gully, Lane Neave, Anderson Lloyd, Holland Beckett, Wynn Williams, Cooney Lees Morgan, Hesketh Henry, Greenwood Roche. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Duncan Cotterill | Chapman Tripp | Tompkins Wake | Bell Gully | Lane Neave | Anderson Lloyd | Holland Beckett | Wynn Williams | Cooney Lees Morgan | Hesketh Henry | Greenwood Roche |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 18.2% | 11.1% | 11.8% | 11.2% | 9.8% | 8.1% | 9.4% | 7.6% | 4.6% | 4.8% | 3.5% |
| Nov 2025 | 17% | 12.5% | 11.3% | 10.5% | 9.2% | 9.2% | 9.9% | 7.2% | 5.6% | 4.4% | 3.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 14.8% | 13.2% | 13.3% | 10.5% | 8.2% | 9.7% | 8.3% | 7.4% | 5.5% | 5.7% | 3.3% |
| Jan 2026 | 17.5% | 10.4% | 11.6% | 13.3% | 8.1% | 7.7% | 9.1% | 8.9% | 5.5% | 5.1% | 2.7% |
| Feb 2026 | 16.3% | 12.1% | 12.4% | 12.2% | 8.8% | 8.9% | 9.6% | 8.2% | 4.2% | 4.4% | 3.1% |
| Mar 2026 | 16.3% | 12.4% | 9.4% | 12.4% | 10.8% | 10.7% | 6.4% | 8.4% | 3.7% | 5.7% | 3.8% |
| Apr 2026 | 19.7% | 11.9% | 9.9% | 11.9% | 9% | 8.6% | 7.8% | 8% | 5.3% | 4.2% | 3.8% |
| May 2026 | 19.1% | 11.4% | 11.5% | 14.2% | 8.6% | 8.2% | 7.1% | 7.7% | 3.9% | 4.1% | 4.2% |
| Jun 2026 | 18.5% | 10.9% | 11.6% | 11% | 9.7% | 7.9% | 9.5% | 7.5% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 3.4% |
| Jul 2026 | 18.5% | 11.1% | 11.4% | 11.1% | 8.5% | 9.6% | 8.1% | 7.6% | 6% | 4.6% | 3.4% |
| Aug 2026 | 20.6% | 12.2% | 11.7% | 10.2% | 9% | 8.8% | 7.7% | 7% | 5.4% | 4.2% | 3.2% |
| Sep 2026 | 18.1% | 12.9% | 12.2% | 10.7% | 9.7% | 9.3% | 8.2% | 7.3% | 4.4% | 3.9% | 3.3% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 18.1% | 4.1K | -16.9% | -2.5 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 12.9% | 2.9K | 0% | +0.7 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 12.2% | 2.8K | -1.1% | +0.5 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 10.7% | 2.4K | -0.41% | +0.5 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 9.7% | 2.2K | +1.9% | +0.7 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 9.3% | 2.1K | +0.48% | +0.5 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 8.2% | 1.9K | 0% | +0.4 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 7.3% | 1.6K | -1.2% | +0.3 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 4.4% | 1K | -23.1% | -1 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 3.9% | 890 | -11.9% | -0.3 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 3.3% | 750 | -2.6% | +0.1 points |
18.1%
Held 1st. 4.1K estimated branded searches, -16.9% vs prior month. Share -2.5 points.
12.9%
Held 2nd. 2.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.7 points.
12.2%
Held 3rd. 2.8K estimated branded searches, -1.1% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
10.7%
Held 4th. 2.4K estimated branded searches, -0.41% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
9.7%
Held 5th. 2.2K estimated branded searches, +1.9% vs prior month. Share +0.7 points.
9.3%
Held 6th. 2.1K estimated branded searches, +0.48% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
8.2%
Held 7th. 1.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
7.3%
Held 8th. 1.6K estimated branded searches, -1.2% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
4.4%
Held 9th. 1K estimated branded searches, -23.1% vs prior month. Share -1 points.
3.9%
Held 10th. 890 estimated branded searches, -11.9% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
3.3%
Held 11th. 750 estimated branded searches, -2.6% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
Compare popularity between Cooney Lees Morgan and its closest rivals
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Anderson Lloyd: compare popularity
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Holland Beckett: compare popularity
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Wynn Williams: compare popularity
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Hesketh Henry: compare popularity
Cooney Lees Morgan vs Greenwood Roche: compare popularity- Compare Cooney Lees Morgan with any brand
Every comparison with Cooney Lees Morgan
12 comparisons
- Anderson Lloyd vs Cooney Lees Morgan
- Bell Gully vs Cooney Lees Morgan
- Chapman Tripp vs Cooney Lees Morgan
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Duncan Cotterill
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Holland Beckett
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Lane Neave
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Tompkins Wake
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Wynn Williams
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Hesketh Henry
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Greenwood Roche
- Cooney Lees Morgan vs Sharp Tudhope
- Burley Castle Hawkins vs Cooney Lees Morgan
How has branded search demand for Cooney Lees Morgan changed in New Zealand over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Cooney Lees Morgan in New Zealand held steady at 1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Cooney Lees Morgan’s share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand peaked at 6% in July 2026 and was lowest at 3.7% in March 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Cooney Lees Morgan rose from 10th to 9th among national and regional law firms in New Zealand.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand national and regional law firms in September 2026?
6 changes
In September 2026, Chapman Tripp gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 12.2% to 12.9%.
In September 2026, Lane Neave gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 9% to 9.7%.
In September 2026, Anderson Lloyd gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 8.8% to 9.3%.
In September 2026, Bell Gully gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 10.2% to 10.7%.
In September 2026, Tompkins Wake gained share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 11.7% to 12.2%.
In September 2026, Duncan Cotterill lost share of searches among national and regional law firms in New Zealand, from 20.6% to 18.1%.
How are Cooney Lees Morgan’s branded searches counted?
4 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Cooney Lees Morgan’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- cooney lees morgan
- cooney lees morgan lawyers
- cooney lees morgan tauranga
- cooneyleesmorgan
Do you work for Cooney Lees Morgan? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does Cooney Lees Morgan compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| national and regional law firms | 9th of 11 | 4.4% | Shown above |
| Tauranga law firms | 2nd of 4 | 27.9% | Show ranking |
Is Cooney Lees Morgan your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.