Brandwave

Miracle-Gro vs Scotts:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Miracle-Gro had more branded searches than Scotts among lawn fertiliser brands worldwide. Miracle-Gro had about 33,100 branded searches, while Scotts had 1,600. Miracle-Gro made up 8.6% of all lawn fertiliser brand searches we track, and Scotts accounted for 0.41%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about lawn fertiliser brands, Scotts appeared in four of the five answers and Miracle-Gro in none.

Among lawn fertiliser brands worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Miracle-Gro, about 21 searches for every 1 for Scotts

Miracle-Gro 33.1K searchesScotts 1.6K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Scotts, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Miracle-Gro in 0

Scotts in 4 of 5Miracle-Gro in 0 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Scotts, the only one of the two named

Scotts first in 3Miracle-Gro never named

Follow Miracle-Gro vs Scotts and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top lawn fertiliser brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Scotts was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Miracle-Gro did not appear in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Scotts1st
  2. The Andersons2nd
  3. Jonathan Green3rd
  4. Daltons–
  5. Yates–
  6. Miracle-Gro–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Scotts4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • The Andersons3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Jonathan Green2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Daltons0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Yates0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Miracle-Gro0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about lawn fertiliser brands

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

Is Miracle-Gro or Scotts more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Miracle-Gro and Scotts by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all six lawn fertiliser brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Miracle-Gro and Scotts among lawn fertiliser brands worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Miracle-Gro, Scotts. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthDaltonsYatesMiracle-GroJonathan GreenScottsThe Andersons
Oct 202581%10.9%6%1.8%0.29%0.05%
Nov 202581.3%10.9%6%1.5%0.24%0.02%
Dec 202581.3%10.9%6%1.5%0.24%0.02%
Jan 202681.3%10.9%6%1.5%0.24%0.03%
Feb 202681.7%9%7.4%1.5%0.43%0.07%
Mar 202675.2%8.3%12.4%3.1%0.9%0.15%
Apr 202669.6%9.4%17.1%2.9%0.83%0.14%
May 202667.9%9.1%20.4%1.9%0.54%0.11%
Jun 202667.9%9.1%20.4%1.9%0.52%0.09%
Jul 202667.5%13.6%16.6%1.9%0.36%0.06%
Aug 202672.9%12%12%2.5%0.47%0.08%
Sep 202677.9%10.5%8.6%2.6%0.41%0.07%

How has the Miracle-Gro and Scotts comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Miracle-Gro was ahead of Scotts in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Miracle-Gro’s share of searches among lawn fertiliser brands worldwide moved from 6% to 8.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 27.1K to 33.1K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Scotts’ share of searches among lawn fertiliser brands worldwide moved from 0.29% to 0.41%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1.3K to 1.6K.

How did search popularity change for lawn fertiliser brands worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Miracle-Gro lost share of searches among lawn fertiliser brands worldwide, from 12% to 8.6%.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Scotts worldwide rose 23.1% over 12 measured months, from 1.3K to 1.6K in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Miracle-Gro’s and Scotts’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Miracle-Gro

1 branded search term

  • miracle-gro

Scotts

1 branded search term

  • scotts lawn

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among lawn fertiliser brands

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.