Brandwave

Hotjar vs Plausible Analytics:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Hotjar had more branded searches than Plausible Analytics among web analytics tools in New Zealand. Hotjar had about 280 branded searches, while Plausible Analytics had 20. Hotjar made up 2.6% of all web analytics tool searches we track, and Plausible Analytics accounted for 0.19%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about web analytics tools, Plausible Analytics appeared in four of the five answers and Hotjar in three. Plausible Analytics was mentioned before Hotjar in four out of five answers.

Among web analytics tools in New Zealand in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Hotjar, about 14 searches for every 1 for Plausible Analytics

Hotjar 280 searchesPlausible Analytics 20 searches

Who does AI mention more?

Plausible Analytics, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Hotjar in 3

Plausible Analytics in 4 of 5Hotjar in 3 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Plausible Analytics, named ahead of Hotjar in 4 of 5 answers

Plausible Analytics first in 4Hotjar first in 1

Follow Hotjar vs Plausible Analytics and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top web analytics tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Plausible Analytics was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Hotjar was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Plausible Analytics was listed before Hotjar in four out of five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Google Analytics1st
  2. Matomo2nd
  3. Plausible Analytics3rd
  4. Microsoft Clarity4th
  5. Adobe Analytics5th
  6. Hotjar6th
  7. Mixpanel7th
  8. Amplitude8th
  9. PostHog9th

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Google Analytics5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Matomo5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Adobe Analytics4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Plausible Analytics4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Hotjar3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Microsoft Clarity2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • PostHog1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Mixpanel1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Amplitude1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about web analytics tools

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 21, 2026.

Is Hotjar or Plausible Analytics more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Hotjar and Plausible Analytics by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine web analytics tools we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.

Hotjar and Plausible Analytics among web analytics tools in New Zealand, by month

Share of searches by month for Hotjar, Plausible Analytics. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthGoogle AnalyticsPostHogMicrosoft ClarityHotjarMixpanelMatomoAdobe AnalyticsAmplitudePlausible Analytics
Oct 202579.3%4.5%4.5%5.7%2.6%1.9%0.65%0.37%0.28%
Nov 202578.6%3.7%4.4%5.5%5.4%1.5%0.45%0.09%0.18%
Dec 202578%5.4%4.5%4.6%4.6%1.8%0.41%0.41%0.27%
Jan 202679.4%5.5%5.5%4.7%3%1.2%0.22%0.11%0.45%
Feb 202680.4%4.5%6.8%3.9%1.8%1.7%0.45%0.23%0.23%
Mar 202684.4%4.9%4.9%2.3%0.96%1.7%0.4%0.16%0.32%
Apr 202682.2%3.8%7.2%2.9%1.4%1.4%0.38%0.19%0.48%
May 202683.4%4.7%5.8%3%1.1%0.96%0.48%0.1%0.38%
Jun 202677.8%7.9%6.5%3.8%1.7%1.4%0.35%0.09%0.61%
Jul 202680.4%6.7%6.8%2.6%1.5%1%0.27%0.18%0.46%
Aug 202680.9%6.7%6.8%2.6%1.1%1.1%0.37%0.09%0.28%
Sep 202681.2%7%5.7%2.6%1.5%1.1%0.38%0.19%0.19%

How has the Hotjar and Plausible Analytics comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings

How did search popularity change for New Zealand web analytics tools in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Plausible Analytics fell from 8th to 9th among web analytics tools in New Zealand.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Hotjar in New Zealand fell 54.8% over 12 measured months, from 620 to 280 in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

5 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Hotjar’s and Plausible Analytics’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Hotjar

4 branded search terms

  • hotjar
  • hotjar analytics
  • hotjar heatmap
  • hotjar tracking

Plausible Analytics

1 branded search term

  • plausible analytics

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among web analytics tools

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.