Brandwave

Fiskars vs Gardena:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Gardena had more branded searches than Fiskars among watering can brands worldwide. Gardena had about 201,000 branded searches, while Fiskars had 167,000. Gardena made up 36.1% of all watering can brand searches we track, and Fiskars accounted for 30%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about watering can brands, Fiskars appeared in two of the five answers and Gardena in none.

Among watering can brands worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Gardena, about 20% more searches than Fiskars

Gardena 201K searchesFiskars 167K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Fiskars, mentioned in 2 of 5 answers, Gardena in 0

Fiskars in 2 of 5Gardena in 0 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Fiskars, the only one of the two named

Fiskars first in 2Gardena never named

Follow Fiskars vs Gardena and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top watering can brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Fiskars was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Gardena did not appear in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Haws1st
  2. Behrens2nd
  3. Fiskars3rd
  4. Gardena–
  5. Neta–
  6. Hozelock–
  7. Burgon & Ball–
  8. Draper–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Haws4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Behrens3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Fiskars2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Gardena0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Neta0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Hozelock0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Burgon & Ball0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Draper0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about watering can brands

5 answers
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “Which watering can brand should I buy?”

    1. 1Haws
    2. 2Fiskars
    3. 3Behrens
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What are the best watering can brands?”

    1. 1Haws
    2. 2Behrens
    3. 3Fiskars
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What's the best watering can brand for houseplants and garden?”

    1. 1Haws
    2. 2Behrens
  • Searched Google, AI Overview

    “best watering can”

    1. 1Haws
  • Searched Google, AI Overview

    “watering can for plants”

    Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

    Is Fiskars or Gardena more popular in search?

    This chart shows how often people search Google for Fiskars and Gardena by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight watering can brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

    Fiskars and Gardena among watering can brands worldwide, by month

    Share of searches by month for Gardena, Fiskars. The figures are in the table below the chart.

    View monthly share of searches table
    MonthGardenaFiskarsNetaBehrensHawsHozelockBurgon & BallDraper
    Oct 202531.5%30.3%25.8%3.5%5.2%2.8%0.92%<0.01%
    Nov 202530%33.9%24.5%4%4%2.2%1.3%<0.01%
    Dec 202528.7%35.1%23.4%3.9%4.7%2.6%1.6%<0.01%
    Jan 202626.8%31.6%26.8%6.6%4.4%2.9%0.95%<0.01%
    Feb 202634.4%31.7%22.9%3.1%3.8%3.1%1%<0.01%
    Mar 202642.6%26.9%19.1%2.6%3.1%4.7%1%<0.01%
    Apr 202647.1%26.5%14.1%2.3%2.8%6.3%0.94%0.01%
    May 202650.8%24.4%12.4%2%2.5%6.8%1%0.04%
    Jun 202649.8%22.7%14.9%2.4%2.4%6.7%0.97%0.02%
    Jul 202643.4%26%15.8%2.6%2.6%8.7%0.85%0.04%
    Aug 202639.5%30.1%17.7%2.9%3.6%5.3%0.94%0.01%
    Sep 202636.1%30%19.8%5.9%4%3.3%0.88%<0.01%

    How has the Fiskars and Gardena comparison changed over the last 12 months?

    3 findings
    • The lead changed hands 2 times in the 12 months ending September 2026: Fiskars took it in November 2025, Gardena took it in February 2026.
    • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Fiskars’ share of searches among watering can brands worldwide moved from 30.3% to 30%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 159K to 167K.
    • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Gardena’s share of searches among watering can brands worldwide moved from 31.5% to 36.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 165K to 201K.

    How did search popularity change for watering can brands worldwide in September 2026?

    1 change
    1. In September 2026, Gardena lost share of searches among watering can brands worldwide, from 39.5% to 36.1%.

    How are branded searches counted?

    4 search terms

    Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Fiskars’ and Gardena’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

    Fiskars

    3 branded search terms

    • fiskars
    • fiskars scissors
    • fiskars weed puller

    Gardena

    1 branded search term

    • gardena

    How the Brand Demand Index is measured

    Other head-to-heads among watering can brands

    Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

    Put your own brand in this comparison

    Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.