How popular isInside Recruitment?
In September 2026, people searched for Inside Recruitment by name about 600 times in New Zealand, a 22.4% increase from the previous year. These searches made up 10.7% of all New Zealand executive search firm searches, placing Inside Recruitment fourth out of 13 firms. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about executive search firms, Inside Recruitment did not appear in any of the answers.
Inside Recruitment is the fourth most searched of 13 competitors and not listed in any AI answer.
Robert WaltersShare of searches 23.1%Mentioned in 2 of 3 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th
JacksonStone & PartnersShare of searches 11%Mentioned in 3 of 3 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 6th
Hobson LeavyShare of searches 10.7%Mentioned in 0 of 3 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
Inside RecruitmentShare of searches 10.7%Mentioned in 0 of 3 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –- Kerridge & PartnersShare of searches 8.5%Mentioned in 2 of 3 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
Follow Inside Recruitment and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top executive search firms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions, Inside Recruitment did not appear in any of the three answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
JacksonStone & Partners3 of 3Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Robert Walters2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers- Kerridge & Partners2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Korn Ferry2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Sheffield2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers- Johnson Partners2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Farrow Jamieson1 of 3Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Ichor Leadership Search1 of 3Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Hobson Leavy0 of 3Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Inside Recruitment0 of 3Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answers
See every answer about executive search firms
3 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which executive search firm should I hire in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best executive search firms in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best executive search firm in New Zealand for senior leaders?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“director search nz”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Searched Google, AI Overview
“executive search firms nz”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 20, 2026.
Which executive search firms compete with Inside Recruitment?
Share of searches by month for Robert Walters, JacksonStone & Partners, Hobson Leavy, Inside Recruitment, Kerridge & Partners, Korn Ferry, Sheffield, Alexander James, Sprout People, Decipher Group, Farrow Jamieson, Johnson Partners. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Robert Walters | JacksonStone & Partners | Hobson Leavy | Inside Recruitment | Kerridge & Partners | Korn Ferry | Sheffield | Alexander James | Sprout People | Decipher Group | Farrow Jamieson | Johnson Partners | Ichor Leadership Search |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 27% | 8.9% | 10.1% | 8.3% | 8.1% | 8.1% | 5.6% | 7.9% | 3.9% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 2.4% | 0.67% |
| Nov 2025 | 26.6% | 9.4% | 10% | 10% | 9.8% | 8% | 4.5% | 7.8% | 3.3% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 1% |
| Dec 2025 | 28.5% | 8% | 9.4% | 7.4% | 9.1% | 9.1% | 5.1% | 7.7% | 2.8% | 3.1% | 7.7% | 1.4% | 0.57% |
| Jan 2026 | 24.7% | 8.2% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 9.1% | 7.4% | 5.1% | 8.9% | 3.4% | 6.3% | 4.2% | 2.7% | 1.3% |
| Feb 2026 | 29.4% | 7.3% | 11% | 9% | 10.8% | 7.2% | 5% | 8.6% | 2.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | 2% | 0.55% |
| Mar 2026 | 24.2% | 8.5% | 13.4% | 11% | 8.9% | 8.9% | 4.1% | 7.1% | 4.2% | 2.6% | 4.2% | 2.6% | 0.3% |
| Apr 2026 | 28.2% | 9.9% | 10.7% | 8.6% | 8.5% | 8.5% | 4.8% | 6.9% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 3.9% | 1.9% | 0.35% |
| May 2026 | 27.4% | 9.1% | 8.6% | 10.3% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 5.8% | 6.9% | 3.9% | 3.1% | 5.7% | 2.4% | 0.34% |
| Jun 2026 | 27.2% | 11% | 10.2% | 10.2% | 6.6% | 8.1% | 5.6% | 8% | 3.2% | 3.6% | 3.1% | 2.9% | 0.34% |
| Jul 2026 | 27.4% | 13.7% | 8.4% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 10.1% | 3.8% | 9.6% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 2.9% | 0.85% |
| Aug 2026 | 22.7% | 11.4% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 8.4% | 8.4% | 7% | 8.9% | 4.2% | 3.8% | 4.9% | 2.4% | 0.7% |
| Sep 2026 | 23.1% | 11% | 10.7% | 10.7% | 8.5% | 8.5% | 7.1% | 6.4% | 5% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.5% | 0.18% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 23.1% | 1.3K | 0% | +0.4 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 11% | 620 | -4.6% | -0.4 points | |
| 3, moved from 4th to 3rd | 10.7% | 600 | +22.4% | +2.1 pointsmoved from 4th to 3rd | |
| 4, moved from 5th to 4th | 10.7% | 600 | +22.4% | +2.1 pointsmoved from 5th to 4th | |
| 5, moved from 6th to 5th | 8.5% | 480 | 0% | +0.1 pointsmoved from 6th to 5th | |
| 6, moved from 7th to 6th | 8.5% | 480 | 0% | +0.1 pointsmoved from 7th to 6th | |
| 7, moved from 8th to 7th | 7.1% | 400 | 0% | +0.1 pointsmoved from 8th to 7th | |
| 8, moved from 3rd to 8th | 6.4% | 360 | -29.4% | -2.5 pointsmoved from 3rd to 8th | |
| 9, moved from 10th to 9th | 5% | 280 | +16.7% | +0.8 pointsmoved from 10th to 9th | |
| 10, moved from 11th to 10th | 3.2% | 180 | -18.2% | -0.6 pointsmoved from 11th to 10th | |
| 11, moved from 9th to 11th | 3.2% | 180 | -35.7% | -1.7 pointsmoved from 9th to 11th | |
| 12, held 12th | 2.5% | 140 | 0% | 0 points | |
| 13, held 13th | 0.18% | 10 | -75% | -0.5 points |
23.1%
Held 1st. 1.3K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
Held 2nd. 620 estimated branded searches, -4.6% vs prior month. Share -0.4 points.
10.7%
Moved from 4th to 3rd. 600 estimated branded searches, +22.4% vs prior month. Share +2.1 points.
10.7%
Moved from 5th to 4th. 600 estimated branded searches, +22.4% vs prior month. Share +2.1 points.
8.5%
Moved from 6th to 5th. 480 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
8.5%
Moved from 7th to 6th. 480 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
7.1%
Moved from 8th to 7th. 400 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
6.4%
Moved from 3rd to 8th. 360 estimated branded searches, -29.4% vs prior month. Share -2.5 points.
5%
Moved from 10th to 9th. 280 estimated branded searches, +16.7% vs prior month. Share +0.8 points.
3.2%
Moved from 11th to 10th. 180 estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -0.6 points.
3.2%
Moved from 9th to 11th. 180 estimated branded searches, -35.7% vs prior month. Share -1.7 points.
2.5%
Held 12th. 140 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
0.18%
Held 13th. 10 estimated branded searches, -75% vs prior month. Share -0.5 points.
Compare popularity between Inside Recruitment and its closest rivals

Inside Recruitment vs Robert Walters: compare popularity
Inside Recruitment vs JacksonStone & Partners: compare popularity
Inside Recruitment vs Hobson Leavy: compare popularity
Inside Recruitment vs Kerridge & Partners: compare popularity
Inside Recruitment vs Korn Ferry: compare popularity- Compare Inside Recruitment with any brand
Every comparison with Inside Recruitment
11 comparisons
- Hobson Leavy vs Inside Recruitment
- Inside Recruitment vs JacksonStone & Partners
- Inside Recruitment vs Robert Walters
- Inside Recruitment vs Kerridge & Partners
- Inside Recruitment vs Korn Ferry
- Inside Recruitment vs Sheffield
- Alexander James vs Inside Recruitment
- Inside Recruitment vs Sprout People
- Decipher Group vs Inside Recruitment
- Farrow Jamieson vs Inside Recruitment
- Inside Recruitment vs Johnson Partners
How has branded search demand for Inside Recruitment changed in New Zealand over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Inside Recruitment in New Zealand rose from 490 to 600.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Inside Recruitment’s share of searches among executive search firms in New Zealand increased from 8.3% to 10.7%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Inside Recruitment’s share of searches among executive search firms in New Zealand peaked at 11% in March 2026 and was lowest at 6.7% in July 2026.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand executive search firms in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Hobson Leavy overtook Alexander James to rank 3rd among executive search firms in New Zealand, with 10.7% of the searches.

In September 2026, Inside Recruitment overtook Alexander James to rank 4th among executive search firms in New Zealand, with 10.7% of the searches.

In September 2026, Sprout People overtook Farrow Jamieson to rank 9th among executive search firms in New Zealand, with 5% of the searches.

In September 2026, Alexander James lost share of searches among executive search firms in New Zealand, from 8.9% to 6.4%.

In September 2026, Farrow Jamieson lost share of searches among executive search firms in New Zealand, from 4.9% to 3.2%.

In September 2026, Decipher Group lost share of searches among executive search firms in New Zealand, from 3.8% to 3.2%.
How are Inside Recruitment’s branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Inside Recruitment’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- Inside Recruitment
- inside recruitment jobs
Who owns Inside Recruitment?
Inside Recruitment is owned by Inside Executive Recruitment Limited. Brandwave does not track any other brands owned by Inside Executive Recruitment Limited.
Do you work for Inside Recruitment? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Inside Recruitment your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.