AB Tasty vs Contentsquare:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Contentsquare had more branded searches than AB Tasty among conversion rate optimisation tools worldwide. Contentsquare had about 18,100 branded searches, while AB Tasty had 6,600. Contentsquare made up 3% of all conversion rate optimisation tool searches we track, and AB Tasty accounted for 1.1%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about conversion rate optimisation tools, Contentsquare appeared in three of the four answers and AB Tasty in none.
Who do people search for more?
Contentsquare, about 3 searches for every 1 for AB Tasty
Who does AI mention more?
Contentsquare, mentioned in 3 of 4 answers, AB Tasty in 0
Who does AI recommend more?
Contentsquare, the only one of the two named
Follow AB Tasty vs Contentsquare and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top conversion rate optimisation tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, Contentsquare was mentioned in three out of four: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in the Google AI Overview. AB Tasty did not appear in any of the four answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
VWO1st
Microsoft Clarity2nd
Optimizely3rd
Hotjar4th
Contentsquare5th
Unbounce6th
Crazy Egg7th
Convert.com8th
AB Tasty–
Kameleoon–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Optimizely4 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Microsoft Clarity4 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Hotjar4 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
VWO4 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Contentsquare3 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Unbounce2 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Crazy Egg2 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Convert.com1 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
AB Tasty0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Kameleoon0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
See every answer about conversion rate optimisation tools
4 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which conversion rate optimisation tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best conversion rate optimisation tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best conversion rate optimisation tool for more online sales?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“conversion rate optimisation tool”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“conversion optimisation software”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is AB Tasty or Contentsquare more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for AB Tasty and Contentsquare by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten conversion rate optimisation tools we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Contentsquare, AB Tasty. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Optimizely | Microsoft Clarity | Hotjar | VWO | Contentsquare | Unbounce | Crazy Egg | AB Tasty | Kameleoon | Convert.com |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 39.6% | 17.7% | 21.7% | 8% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 0.87% | 0.32% |
| Nov 2025 | 42.3% | 18.9% | 18.9% | 7% | 3.1% | 4.7% | 2.5% | 1.4% | 0.93% | 0.34% |
| Dec 2025 | 44.9% | 20.1% | 16.5% | 7.4% | 2.7% | 4.1% | 2.2% | 1.2% | 0.66% | 0.31% |
| Jan 2026 | 43.4% | 19.5% | 15.9% | 10.7% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 0.64% | 0.29% |
| Feb 2026 | 42% | 23% | 12.6% | 10.3% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.75% | 0.29% |
| Mar 2026 | 43% | 23.6% | 10.6% | 10.6% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.77% | 0.3% |
| Apr 2026 | 43.8% | 24% | 10.8% | 8.8% | 4% | 4% | 2.2% | 1.4% | 0.78% | 0.3% |
| May 2026 | 43.2% | 29% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 0.77% | 0.44% |
| Jun 2026 | 41.2% | 27.7% | 12.4% | 8.3% | 3% | 3% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 0.91% | 0.43% |
| Jul 2026 | 44.2% | 29.7% | 8.9% | 7.3% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.79% | 0.55% |
| Aug 2026 | 45.1% | 30.3% | 9.1% | 6.1% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.66% | 0.7% |
| Sep 2026 | 40.2% | 27% | 18% | 5.4% | 3% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.72% | 0.62% |
How has the AB Tasty and Contentsquare comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Contentsquare was ahead of AB Tasty in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, AB Tasty’s share of searches among conversion rate optimisation tools worldwide moved from 1.6% to 1.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 9.9K to 6.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Contentsquare’s share of searches among conversion rate optimisation tools worldwide moved from 3.6% to 3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 22.2K to 18.1K.
How did search popularity change for conversion rate optimisation tools worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

Estimated monthly branded searches for AB Tasty worldwide fell 33.3% over 12 measured months, from 9.9K to 6.6K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Contentsquare worldwide fell 18.5% over 12 measured months, from 22.2K to 18.1K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using AB Tasty’s and Contentsquare’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
AB Tasty
1 branded search term
- ab tasty
Contentsquare
1 branded search term
- contentsquare
Other head-to-heads among conversion rate optimisation tools

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.