How popular isVan Cleef & Arpels?
In September 2026, people searched for Van Cleef & Arpels by name about 450,000 times worldwide, a 22.3% increase from the previous year. These searches made up 3.8% of all global jewellery brand searches, placing Van Cleef & Arpels sixth out of 13 brands. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about jewellery brands, Van Cleef & Arpels appeared in three of the five answers and was the fourth most recommended of the 13.
Van Cleef & Arpels is the sixth most searched of 13 competitors and the fourth most recommended in AI answers.
SwarovskiShare of searches 34.4%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 12th
CartierShare of searches 23.1%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
PandoraShare of searches 13%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th
Tiffany & Co.Share of searches 11.1%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
Van Cleef & ArpelsShare of searches 3.8%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
Follow Van Cleef & Arpels and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top jewellery brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Van Cleef & Arpels was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Van Cleef & Arpels is the fourth most recommended of the 13.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Cartier1st
Tiffany & Co.2nd
Mejuri3rd
Van Cleef & Arpels4th
Pandora5th
Bulgari6th
Gorjana7th
Missoma7th
Harry Winston9th
David Yurman10th- +3 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Cartier4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Tiffany & Co.4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Mejuri4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Pandora3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Van Cleef & Arpels3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Bulgari3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
David Yurman2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Gorjana2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Harry Winston2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Missoma2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about jewellery brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which jewellery brand should I buy?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best jewellery brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best jewellery brand for everyday wear?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“jewellery brands”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“fine jewellery”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 19, 2026.
Which jewellery brands compete with Van Cleef & Arpels?
Share of searches by month for Swarovski, Cartier, Pandora, Tiffany & Co., David Yurman, Van Cleef & Arpels, Mejuri, Bulgari, Gorjana. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Swarovski | Cartier | Pandora | Tiffany & Co. | David Yurman | Van Cleef & Arpels | Mejuri | Bulgari | Gorjana | Harry Winston | Missoma | Catbird | Meadowlark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 31.6% | 25.9% | 12% | 12.8% | 4.3% | 2.8% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 0.57% | 0.27% | <0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 33.9% | 18.6% | 19.2% | 11.1% | 4.6% | 2% | 4.6% | 2% | 2% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 0.32% | <0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 34.8% | 15.6% | 21.3% | 11.4% | 5.7% | 2.1% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.51% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 34.9% | 23.4% | 13.2% | 11.5% | 4.7% | 2.6% | 3.1% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 0.52% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 38.1% | 20.9% | 12.7% | 12.5% | 4.2% | 2.3% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 1% | 0.46% | 0.24% | <0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 34.1% | 22.9% | 12.9% | 11.3% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.62% | 0.27% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 33.5% | 22.5% | 11.3% | 13.4% | 5.5% | 3% | 3.7% | 3% | 2% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 34.6% | 23.2% | 14.1% | 11.3% | 4.7% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.51% | 0.27% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 33.6% | 22.5% | 15.6% | 11.2% | 4.5% | 3% | 3% | 2.5% | 2% | 1.1% | 0.61% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 33.5% | 22.5% | 13.7% | 13.2% | 4.5% | 3% | 3% | 2.5% | 2% | 1.1% | 0.61% | 0.32% | <0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 33.4% | 22.4% | 12.7% | 13.2% | 4.5% | 3% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 34.4% | 23.1% | 13% | 11.1% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.62% | 0.22% | <0.01% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 34.4% | 4.1M | 0% | +1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 23.1% | 2.7M | 0% | +0.7 points | |
| 3, moved from 4th to 3rd | 13% | 1.6M | 0% | +0.4 pointsmoved from 4th to 3rd | |
| 4, moved from 3rd to 4th | 11.1% | 1.3M | -18% | -2.1 pointsmoved from 3rd to 4th | |
| 5, held 5th | 4.6% | 550K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 6, moved from 7th to 6th | 3.8% | 450K | +22.3% | +0.8 pointsmoved from 7th to 6th | |
| 7, moved from 6th to 7th | 3.1% | 368K | -18.2% | -0.6 pointsmoved from 6th to 7th | |
| 8, held 8th | 2.5% | 301K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 2.1% | 246K | -18.3% | -0.4 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 1.4% | 165K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 0.62% | 74K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 12, held 12th | 0.22% | 26.2K | -18.4% | 0 points | |
| 13, held 13th | <0.01% | 30 | +50% | 0 points |
34.4%
Held 1st. 4.1M estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +1 points.
2.
Cartier23.1%
Held 2nd. 2.7M estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.7 points.
3.
Pandora13%
Moved from 4th to 3rd. 1.6M estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
11.1%
Moved from 3rd to 4th. 1.3M estimated branded searches, -18% vs prior month. Share -2.1 points.
4.6%
Held 5th. 550K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
3.8%
Moved from 7th to 6th. 450K estimated branded searches, +22.3% vs prior month. Share +0.8 points.
7.
Mejuri3.1%
Moved from 6th to 7th. 368K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -0.6 points.
8.
Bulgari2.5%
Held 8th. 301K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
9.
Gorjana2.1%
Held 9th. 246K estimated branded searches, -18.3% vs prior month. Share -0.4 points.
1.4%
Held 10th. 165K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
11.
Missoma0.62%
Held 11th. 74K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
12.
Catbird0.22%
Held 12th. 26.2K estimated branded searches, -18.4% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
13.
Meadowlark<0.01%
Held 13th. 30 estimated branded searches, +50% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Van Cleef & Arpels and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Van Cleef & Arpels
11 comparisons
- Cartier vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- David Yurman vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- Pandora vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- Swarovski vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- Tiffany & Co. vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- Mejuri vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- Bulgari vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- Gorjana vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- Harry Winston vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- Missoma vs Van Cleef & Arpels
- Catbird vs Van Cleef & Arpels
How has branded search demand for Van Cleef & Arpels changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
4 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Van Cleef & Arpels worldwide rose from 368K to 450K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Van Cleef & Arpels’ share of searches among jewellery brands worldwide increased from 2.8% to 3.8%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Van Cleef & Arpels’ share of searches among jewellery brands worldwide peaked at 3.8% in September 2026 and was lowest at 2% in November 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Van Cleef & Arpels rose from 8th to 6th among jewellery brands worldwide.
How did search popularity change for jewellery brands worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Van Cleef & Arpels overtook Mejuri to rank 6th among jewellery brands worldwide, with 3.8% of the searches.

In September 2026, Swarovski gained share of searches among jewellery brands worldwide, from 33.4% to 34.4%.

In September 2026, Cartier gained share of searches among jewellery brands worldwide, from 22.4% to 23.1%.

In September 2026, Tiffany & Co. lost share of searches among jewellery brands worldwide, from 13.2% to 11.1%.

In September 2026, Mejuri lost share of searches among jewellery brands worldwide, from 3.7% to 3.1%.

In September 2026, Pandora rose from 4th to 3rd among jewellery brands worldwide.
How are Van Cleef & Arpels’ branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Van Cleef & Arpels’ name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- van cleef and arpels
Who owns Van Cleef & Arpels?
Van Cleef & Arpels is owned by Richemont. Brandwave does not track any other brands owned by Richemont.
Do you work for Van Cleef & Arpels? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Van Cleef & Arpels your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.