Brandwave

Missoma vs Van Cleef & Arpels:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Van Cleef & Arpels had more branded searches than Missoma among jewellery brands worldwide. Van Cleef & Arpels had about 450,000 branded searches, while Missoma had 74,000. Van Cleef & Arpels made up 3.8% of all jewellery brand searches we track, and Missoma accounted for 0.62%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about jewellery brands, Van Cleef & Arpels appeared in three of the five answers and Missoma in two. Van Cleef & Arpels was mentioned before Missoma in three out of four answers that named either.

Among jewellery brands worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Van Cleef & Arpels, about 6 searches for every 1 for Missoma

Van Cleef & Arpels 450K searchesMissoma 74K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Van Cleef & Arpels, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Missoma in 2

Van Cleef & Arpels in 3 of 5Missoma in 2 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Van Cleef & Arpels, named ahead of Missoma in 3 of 4 answers

Van Cleef & Arpels first in 3Missoma first in 1

Follow Missoma vs Van Cleef & Arpels and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top jewellery brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Van Cleef & Arpels was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Missoma was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Van Cleef & Arpels was listed before Missoma in three out of four answers that named either.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Cartier1st
  2. Tiffany & Co.2nd
  3. Mejuri3rd
  4. Van Cleef & Arpels4th
  5. Pandora5th
  6. Bulgari6th
  7. Gorjana7th
  8. Missoma7th
  9. Harry Winston9th
  10. David Yurman10th
  11. +3 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Cartier4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Tiffany & Co.4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Mejuri4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Pandora3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Van Cleef & Arpels3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Bulgari3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • David Yurman2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Gorjana2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Harry Winston2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Missoma2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

+3 more

See every answer about jewellery brands

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 19, 2026.

Is Missoma or Van Cleef & Arpels more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Missoma and Van Cleef & Arpels by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 13 jewellery brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Missoma and Van Cleef & Arpels among jewellery brands worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Van Cleef & Arpels, Missoma. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthSwarovskiCartierPandoraTiffany & Co.David YurmanVan Cleef & ArpelsMejuriBulgariGorjanaHarry WinstonMissomaCatbirdMeadowlark
Oct 202531.6%25.9%12%12.8%4.3%2.8%3.5%2.8%1.9%1.6%0.57%0.27%<0.01%
Nov 202533.9%18.6%19.2%11.1%4.6%2%4.6%2%2%0.91%0.75%0.32%<0.01%
Dec 202534.8%15.6%21.3%11.4%5.7%2.1%3.1%2.1%2.1%1.1%0.51%0.26%<0.01%
Jan 202634.9%23.4%13.2%11.5%4.7%2.6%3.1%2.6%1.7%1.4%0.52%0.26%<0.01%
Feb 202638.1%20.9%12.7%12.5%4.2%2.3%3.4%2.3%1.9%1%0.46%0.24%<0.01%
Mar 202634.1%22.9%12.9%11.3%4.6%3.1%3.8%3.1%2.1%1.4%0.62%0.27%<0.01%
Apr 202633.5%22.5%11.3%13.4%5.5%3%3.7%3%2%1.4%0.5%0.26%<0.01%
May 202634.6%23.2%14.1%11.3%4.7%2.5%3.1%2.5%2.1%1.1%0.51%0.27%<0.01%
Jun 202633.6%22.5%15.6%11.2%4.5%3%3%2.5%2%1.1%0.61%0.26%<0.01%
Jul 202633.5%22.5%13.7%13.2%4.5%3%3%2.5%2%1.1%0.61%0.32%<0.01%
Aug 202633.4%22.4%12.7%13.2%4.5%3%3.7%2.5%2.5%1.3%0.6%0.26%<0.01%
Sep 202634.4%23.1%13%11.1%4.6%3.8%3.1%2.5%2.1%1.4%0.62%0.22%<0.01%

How has the Missoma and Van Cleef & Arpels comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings

How did search popularity change for jewellery brands worldwide in September 2026?

1 change
  1. In September 2026, Van Cleef & Arpels overtook Mejuri to rank 6th among jewellery brands worldwide, with 3.8% of the searches.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Missoma’s and Van Cleef & Arpels’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Missoma

1 branded search term

  • missoma

Van Cleef & Arpels

1 branded search term

  • van cleef and arpels

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among jewellery brands

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.