Furniture Retailersin New Zealand
Furniture and bedding retailers serving NZ shoppers.
In August 2026, Harvey Norman held 49.1% estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers.
- Highest Share of Search
- 49.1%Harvey Norman, August 2026
- Lead over 2nd
- 34.3 pointsHarvey Norman over Big Save Furniture
- Estimated monthly branded searches
- 289Kacross 7 measured brands
- Brands compared
- 7in New Zealand
Share of SearchLeaderboard
Each brand’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in Aug 2026.
| Rank | Brand | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 49.1% | 142K | -0.28% | +0.6 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 14.7% | 42.6K | -17.8% | -2.9 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 11.3% | 32.5K | +17.7% | +1.8 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 9.4% | 27.2K | +0.07% | +0.2 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 9.1% | 26.2K | -0.08% | +0.1 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 5.1% | 14.8K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 1.3% | 3.8K | +1.1% | +0 points |
49.1%
held 1st · 142K estimated branded searches · -0.28% vs prior month · +0.6 points
14.7%
held 2nd · 42.6K estimated branded searches · -17.8% vs prior month · -2.9 points
3.
NOOD11.3%
held 3rd · 32.5K estimated branded searches · +17.7% vs prior month · +1.8 points
9.4%
held 4th · 27.2K estimated branded searches · +0.07% vs prior month · +0.2 points
5.
Mocka9.1%
held 5th · 26.2K estimated branded searches · -0.08% vs prior month · +0.1 points
5.1%
held 6th · 14.8K estimated branded searches · 0% vs prior month · +0.1 points
1.3%
held 7th · 3.8K estimated branded searches · +1.1% vs prior month · +0 points
Compare two brands head-to-head
Share of Search by month for Harvey Norman, Big Save Furniture, NOOD, Freedom Furniture, Mocka, Target Furniture. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of search table
| Month | Harvey Norman | Big Save Furniture | NOOD | Freedom Furniture | Mocka | Target Furniture | Smiths City |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 47.3% | 7.9% | 6.3% | 7.6% | 7.1% | 2.8% | 21% |
| Oct 2025 | 56.5% | 10.8% | 9.1% | 9% | 8.7% | 4% | 1.9% |
| Nov 2025 | 64.3% | 8.8% | 8% | 6.9% | 7.9% | 3.1% | 0.96% |
| Dec 2025 | 65.3% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 8.6% | 5.5% | 3.1% | 0.99% |
| Jan 2026 | 56.2% | 10.6% | 8.7% | 10.9% | 8.6% | 4% | 1% |
| Feb 2026 | 60.2% | 10% | 9.3% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 4.3% | 0.89% |
| Mar 2026 | 61.4% | 10.3% | 7.9% | 8.1% | 7.8% | 3.6% | 1.1% |
| Apr 2026 | 58% | 11.1% | 9.1% | 9.3% | 7.3% | 4.1% | 1% |
| May 2026 | 56.7% | 11.6% | 8.6% | 9.1% | 8.5% | 4.9% | 0.69% |
| Jun 2026 | 49.7% | 12.2% | 9.3% | 11.7% | 11.2% | 5.2% | 0.72% |
| Jul 2026 | 48.4% | 17.6% | 9.4% | 9.3% | 8.9% | 5.1% | 1.3% |
| Aug 2026 | 49.1% | 14.7% | 11.3% | 9.4% | 9.1% | 5.1% | 1.3% |
What changed among furniture retailers in New Zealand?

In August 2026, NOOD gained estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand, from 9.4% to 11.3%.

In August 2026, Harvey Norman gained estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand, from 48.4% to 49.1%.

In August 2026, Big Save Furniture lost estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand, from 17.6% to 14.7%.

Smiths City’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand has gained ground for 3 months in a row, from 0.69% to 1.3% in August 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Target Furniture in New Zealand rose 22.4% over 12 measured months, from 12.1K to 14.8K in August 2026.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Freedom Furniture in New Zealand fell 18.1% over 12 measured months, from 33.3K to 27.2K in August 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Mocka in New Zealand fell 16% over 12 measured months, from 31.2K to 26.2K in August 2026.
Which brand has the highest Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand?
Harvey Norman holds the highest estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand, at 49.1% in August 2026. Big Save Furniture is in 2nd place, 34.3 percentage points behind at 14.7% Share of Search.
| Brand | Share of Search | Peak | Low | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.3% → 49.1% | 65.3% (Dec 2025) | 47.3% (Sep 2025) | 1st | |
| 7.9% → 14.7% | 17.6% (Jul 2026) | 7.9% (Sep 2025) | 3rd → 2nd | |
| 6.3% → 11.3% | 11.3% (Aug 2026) | 6.3% (Sep 2025) | 6th → 3rd | |
| 7.6% → 9.4% | 11.7% (Jun 2026) | 6.9% (Nov 2025) | 4th | |
| 7.1% → 9.1% | 11.2% (Jun 2026) | 5.5% (Dec 2025) | 5th | |
| 2.8% → 5.1% | 5.2% (Jun 2026) | 2.8% (Sep 2025) | 7th → 6th | |
| 21% → 1.3% | 21% (Sep 2025) | 0.69% (May 2026) | 2nd → 7th |
Quote these findings
- Harvey Norman holds the highest estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand, at 49.1% in August 2026.
- Big Save Furniture is in 2nd place, 34.3 percentage points behind at 14.7% Share of Search.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Harvey Norman’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand increased from 47.3% to 49.1%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Big Save Furniture’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand increased from 7.9% to 14.7%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, NOOD’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand increased from 6.3% to 11.3%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Freedom Furniture’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand increased from 7.6% to 9.4%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Mocka’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand increased from 7.1% to 9.1%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Target Furniture’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand increased from 2.8% to 5.1%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Smiths City’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand decreased from 21% to 1.3%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Harvey Norman’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand peaked at 65.3% in December 2025 and was lowest at 47.3% in September 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Big Save Furniture’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand peaked at 17.6% in July 2026 and was lowest at 7.9% in September 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Freedom Furniture’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand peaked at 11.7% in June 2026 and was lowest at 6.9% in November 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Mocka’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand peaked at 11.2% in June 2026 and was lowest at 5.5% in December 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Target Furniture’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand peaked at 5.2% in June 2026 and was lowest at 2.8% in September 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Smiths City’s estimated Share of Search among furniture retailers in New Zealand peaked at 21% in September 2025 and was lowest at 0.69% in May 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Big Save Furniture rose from 3rd to 2nd among furniture retailers in New Zealand.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, NOOD rose from 6th to 3rd among furniture retailers in New Zealand.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Target Furniture rose from 7th to 6th among furniture retailers in New Zealand.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Smiths City fell from 2nd to 7th among furniture retailers in New Zealand.
How is branded search demand measured?
Brandwave organizes categories, branded terms, and competitor groups using publicly available information about companies and brands. We obtain third-party modeled search-volume estimates from external search-data providers, then store and keep them up to date. Our Brand Demand Index shares this curated information with everyone for free. The figures cover the 12 months ending Aug 2026.
We estimate branded-search demand in New Zealand for Big Save Furniture, Freedom Furniture, Harvey Norman, Mocka, NOOD, Smiths City and Target Furniture using modeled search-volume estimates for each brand’s name or related terms. This approach has limitations, but it provides a directional view of relative branded-search interest and how it changes over time.
No, Share of Search compares a brand’s estimated search volume with the estimated search volume of other brands in the same group. It measures searches for branded terms, not purchases, so it is not the same as market share, revenue share, or customer share. A brand might have a high Share of Search but still sell less than a competitor, and brands that people buy out of habit might be searched for less than brands people are still considering. Branded-search demand can provide an early signal that interest in a brand is changing. Watching for sustained shifts can help you spot trends sooner, but the metric does not establish what will happen to revenue.
These numbers are estimates and should be seen as a general trend, not an exact count. The figures show rounded monthly search volumes, and a single month’s result might change for reasons unrelated to the brand. Smaller brands are rounded more roughly than larger ones. Search volume estimates searches, not unique people. The real value of these figures is in comparison: every brand in the group is measured the same way, in the same market, and in the same month. This means the differences between brands, and how those differences change over time, are more meaningful than any single number.
Not always. It depends on what your campaign was meant to do. Our public marketing data shows when branded search demand changes, but it doesn’t tell you why. Branded search volume can rise or fall for many reasons. For example, a competitor’s campaign, a news story, a price change, the season, or more people shopping in your category can all play a part. Checking the timing of these changes can give you useful clues, so it helps to see what else was happening at the same time. Brandwave lets you track all your marketing activity and branded search volume together on one timeline, making this much easier.
Yes. Anyone may use, share, adapt, and redistribute data published in the Brandwave Brand Demand Index, including for commercial purposes, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0). Give appropriate credit to Brandwave, link to the source page and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, and indicate if you made changes. This permission covers Brandwave’s published compilation and measurements; it does not grant rights to third-party trademarks or logos. Automated access must use the public pages or API and respect published rate limits.
Not necessarily. Brandwave maintains these brand profiles using publicly available information and data sources. Brandwave never exposes private customer data publicly.

See your own brand in this picture
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to your campaigns, spend and outcomes, so you can see what moved your numbers, not just that they moved.