Brandwave

Faber-Castell vs Sakura:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Faber-Castell had more branded searches than Sakura among art supply brands worldwide. Faber-Castell had about 368,000 branded searches, while Sakura had 48,400. Faber-Castell made up 27.7% of all art supply brand searches we track, and Sakura accounted for 3.6%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about art supply brands, Faber-Castell appeared in all five answers and Sakura in two. Faber-Castell was mentioned before Sakura in every answer.

Among art supply brands worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Faber-Castell, about 8 searches for every 1 for Sakura

Faber-Castell 368K searchesSakura 48.4K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Faber-Castell, mentioned in every answer we collected

Faber-Castell in 5 of 5Sakura in 2 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Faber-Castell, named ahead of Sakura in every answer

Faber-Castell first in 4Sakura never first

Follow Faber-Castell vs Sakura and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top art supply brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Faber-Castell appeared in all five answers. Sakura was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Faber-Castell was listed before Sakura in every answer.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Faber-Castell1st
  2. Prismacolor2nd
  3. Winsor & Newton3rd
  4. Caran d’Ache4th
  5. Liquitex5th
  6. Daniel Smith6th
  7. Staedtler7th
  8. Copic8th
  9. Sakura9th
  10. Ohuhu10th
  11. +5 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Faber-Castell5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Prismacolor5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Caran d’Ache3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Winsor & Newton3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Liquitex3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Crayola2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Ohuhu2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Staedtler2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Sakura2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Copic2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers

+5 more

See every answer about art supply brands

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.

Is Faber-Castell or Sakura more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Faber-Castell and Sakura by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 15 art supply brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Faber-Castell and Sakura among art supply brands worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Faber-Castell, Sakura. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthFaber-CastellCrayolaOhuhuCaran d’AchePoscaPrismacolorStaedtlerPentelWinsor & NewtonSakuraCopicDerwentLiquitexDaniel SmithArteza
Oct 202526.8%14.6%9.8%8%12%5.4%6.6%3.6%3.6%2.4%2.9%2%1.3%0.88%<0.01%
Nov 202524.9%13.6%13.6%9.1%13.6%5%5%3.3%3.3%2.3%2.7%1.5%1%1%<0.01%
Dec 202523.2%12.7%12.7%10.4%15.5%4.7%4.7%3.1%3.8%3.1%2.6%1.4%1.1%0.93%<0.01%
Jan 202631.3%11.5%11.5%7.7%9.4%5.2%6.3%4.2%3.4%2.9%2.8%1.5%1.3%1%<0.01%
Feb 202629.5%13.2%10.8%7.2%10.8%5.9%5.9%4%3.2%3.2%2.6%1.4%1.2%0.97%<0.01%
Mar 202624.4%16.3%11%7.3%11%4.9%6%4.9%4%3.2%2.7%1.8%1.2%1.2%<0.01%
Apr 202625.1%16.7%11.2%7.5%11.2%5%5%4.1%4.1%3.3%2.8%1.5%1.2%1%<0.01%
May 202625%16.7%11.2%7.5%11.2%5%5%4.1%4.1%3.3%2.7%1.8%1.2%1%<0.01%
Jun 202622%17.9%12.1%8.1%9.8%4.4%5.4%4.4%4.4%4.2%3%1.6%1.6%1.1%<0.01%
Jul 202624.5%16.4%13.5%7.4%9%6%4.9%4%3.3%4.6%2.7%1.5%1.2%0.99%<0.01%
Aug 202630.4%16.6%9.1%7.4%7.4%7.4%5%3.3%3.3%4.6%2.2%1.2%1%0.82%<0.01%
Sep 202627.7%15.1%12.4%8.3%8.3%5.6%5.6%3.7%3.7%3.6%2.5%1.4%1.1%0.91%<0.01%

How has the Faber-Castell and Sakura comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Faber-Castell was ahead of Sakura in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Faber-Castell’s share of searches among art supply brands worldwide moved from 26.8% to 27.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 368K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Sakura’s share of searches among art supply brands worldwide moved from 2.4% to 3.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 33.5K to 48.4K.

How did search popularity change for art supply brands worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Faber-Castell lost share of searches among art supply brands worldwide, from 30.4% to 27.7%.

  2. In September 2026, Sakura lost share of searches among art supply brands worldwide, from 4.6% to 3.6%.

How are branded searches counted?

4 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Faber-Castell’s and Sakura’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Faber-Castell

1 branded search term

  • faber castell

Sakura

3 branded search terms

  • sakura koi
  • sakura pens
  • sakura pigma

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among art supply brands

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.