How popular isNATS?
In September 2026, people searched for NATS by name about 720 times worldwide, an 18.2% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 0.57% of all global message queue service searches, placing NATS tenth out of ten services. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about message queue services, NATS appeared in three of the five answers and was the sixth most recommended of the ten.
NATS is the tenth most searched of 10 competitors and the sixth most recommended in AI answers.
RabbitMQShare of searches 58.6%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
Azure Service BusShare of searches 7.8%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
Google Cloud Pub/SubShare of searches 6.9%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th
ActiveMQShare of searches 6.4%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
NATSShare of searches 0.57%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 6th
Follow NATS and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top message queue services in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, NATS was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. NATS is the sixth most recommended of the ten.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
RabbitMQ5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Kafka5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Azure Service Bus4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Google Cloud Pub/Sub4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Amazon SQS4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
NATS3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
ActiveMQ0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ZeroMQ0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Redis Streams0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Google Pub/Sub0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about message queue services
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which message queue service should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best message queue services?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best message queue service for service-to-service messaging?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“message queue services”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“message broker service”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which message queue services compete with NATS?
Share of searches by month for RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus, Google Cloud Pub/Sub, ActiveMQ, Amazon SQS, ZeroMQ, Redis Streams, NATS. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | RabbitMQ | Azure Service Bus | Google Cloud Pub/Sub | ActiveMQ | Amazon SQS | ZeroMQ | Redis Streams | Google Pub/Sub | Kafka | NATS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 62.3% | 6.8% | 5% | 6.8% | 5.6% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 2% | 0.46% | 0.41% |
| Nov 2025 | 59.6% | 6.6% | 6.1% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 8% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 0.54% | 0.48% |
| Dec 2025 | 63.3% | 5.7% | 7% | 5.7% | 4.7% | 7% | 3.8% | 2.1% | 0.51% | 0.41% |
| Jan 2026 | 61.2% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 8.2% | 4.5% | 2% | 0.56% | 0.4% |
| Feb 2026 | 62% | 6.8% | 6.4% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 2% | 0.56% | 0.41% |
| Mar 2026 | 57.8% | 6.4% | 8.8% | 6.4% | 5.2% | 7.8% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 0.68% | 0.46% |
| Apr 2026 | 53.1% | 7.1% | 9.3% | 10.6% | 5.8% | 7.1% | 3.9% | 2.1% | 0.59% | 0.42% |
| May 2026 | 57.9% | 6.3% | 8.3% | 6.3% | 6.3% | 7.7% | 4.2% | 1.9% | 0.56% | 0.46% |
| Jun 2026 | 60.2% | 8% | 6.8% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 6.6% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| Jul 2026 | 61.4% | 6.7% | 6.2% | 6.7% | 5.5% | 6.7% | 3.7% | 2% | 0.6% | 0.49% |
| Aug 2026 | 58.7% | 7.9% | 6.7% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 1.9% | 0.7% | 0.57% |
| Sep 2026 | 58.6% | 7.8% | 6.9% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 1.9% | 0.7% | 0.57% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 58.6% | 74K | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 7.8% | 9.9K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 6.9% | 8.7K | +3.6% | +0.2 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 6.4% | 8.1K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 6.4% | 8.1K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 6.4% | 8.1K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 4.3% | 5.4K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 1.9% | 2.4K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 0.7% | 880 | 0% | 0 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.57% | 720 | 0% | 0 points |
1.
RabbitMQ58.6%
Held 1st. 74K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
7.8%
Held 2nd. 9.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
6.9%
Held 3rd. 8.7K estimated branded searches, +3.6% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
4.
ActiveMQ6.4%
Held 4th. 8.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
6.4%
Held 5th. 8.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
6.
ZeroMQ6.4%
Held 6th. 8.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
4.3%
Held 7th. 5.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
1.9%
Held 8th. 2.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
9.
Kafka0.7%
Held 9th. 880 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
10.
NATS0.57%
Held 10th. 720 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between NATS and its closest rivals
Every comparison with NATS
9 comparisons
How has branded search demand for NATS changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for NATS worldwide fell from 880 to 720.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, NATS’s share of searches among message queue services worldwide held steady, from 0.41% to 0.57%.
How did search popularity change for message queue services worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

Estimated monthly branded searches for Google Pub/Sub worldwide fell 45.5% over 12 measured months, from 4.4K to 2.4K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for ActiveMQ worldwide fell 45.3% over 12 measured months, from 14.8K to 8.1K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for ZeroMQ worldwide fell 45.3% over 12 measured months, from 14.8K to 8.1K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for RabbitMQ worldwide fell 45.2% over 12 measured months, from 135K to 74K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Redis Streams worldwide fell 33.3% over 12 measured months, from 8.1K to 5.4K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Azure Service Bus worldwide fell 33.1% over 12 measured months, from 14.8K to 9.9K in September 2026.
How are NATS’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using NATS’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- nats messaging
Do you work for NATS? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is NATS your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.