Keurig vs Philips:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Keurig had more branded searches than Philips among coffee maker brands in the United States. Keurig had about 246,000 branded searches, while Philips had 8,100. Keurig made up 15.1% of all coffee maker brand searches we track, and Philips accounted for 0.5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about coffee maker brands, Keurig appeared in two of the five answers and Philips in none.
Who do people search for more?
Keurig, about 30 searches for every 1 for Philips
Who does AI mention more?
Keurig, mentioned in 2 of 5 answers, Philips in 0
Who does AI recommend more?
Keurig, the only one of the two named
Follow Keurig vs Philips and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top coffee maker brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Keurig was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Philips did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Breville4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Moccamaster3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
OXO3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Keurig2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
De'Longhi2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Cuisinart2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Nespresso1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Ninja1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Bunn0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Philips0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about coffee maker brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which coffee maker should I buy?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best coffee maker brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What is the best espresso machine for home?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“coffee maker”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“espresso machine”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United States on October 26, 2026.
Is Keurig or Philips more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Keurig and Philips by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 15 coffee maker brands we track, month by month, from searches in United States.
Share of searches by month for Keurig, Philips. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Nespresso | Keurig | Breville | Ninja | De'Longhi | Moccamaster | Cuisinart | Bunn | Jura | Fellow | Hamilton Beach | Mr. Coffee | OXO | Philips | Smeg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 44.6% | 16.3% | 13.3% | 6% | 4% | 3.9% | 4% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.54% |
| Nov 2025 | 42.6% | 15.7% | 15.7% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 0.95% | 0.63% | 0.63% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.42% |
| Dec 2025 | 38.3% | 17.2% | 14.1% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 4.5% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.85% | 0.85% | 0.46% | 0.57% | 0.46% |
| Jan 2026 | 38.6% | 17.3% | 14.1% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 4.5% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 1.3% | 0.85% | 0.85% | 0.85% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.38% |
| Feb 2026 | 42.3% | 18.9% | 10.4% | 6.9% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.93% | 0.93% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.51% | 0.42% |
| Mar 2026 | 42.2% | 18.9% | 10.3% | 6.9% | 4.6% | 4% | 4.6% | 2.5% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.93% | 0.93% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.41% |
| Apr 2026 | 44.5% | 16.3% | 10.9% | 7.3% | 4.9% | 4.1% | 4% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.98% | 0.8% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.44% |
| May 2026 | 44.6% | 16.3% | 10.9% | 7.3% | 4.9% | 4.1% | 4% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.54% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
| Jun 2026 | 44.2% | 16.2% | 10.8% | 7.2% | 5.9% | 4% | 4% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.97% | 0.79% | 0.53% | 0.43% | 0.43% |
| Jul 2026 | 39.4% | 17.6% | 11.8% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 4.3% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
| Aug 2026 | 40.4% | 18.1% | 12.1% | 8.1% | 5.4% | 3.9% | 3.6% | 2% | 2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.89% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| Sep 2026 | 41.3% | 15.1% | 12.3% | 10.1% | 5.6% | 3.8% | 3.7% | 2% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 0.91% | 0.91% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
How has the Keurig and Philips comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Keurig was ahead of Philips in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Keurig’s share of searches among coffee maker brands in the United States moved from 16.3% to 15.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 301K to 246K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Philips’ share of searches among coffee maker brands in the United States moved from 0.54% to 0.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 9.9K to 8.1K.
How did search popularity change for United States coffee maker brands in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Keurig lost share of searches among coffee maker brands in the United States, from 18.1% to 15.1%.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Philips in the United States fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 9.9K to 8.1K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Keurig’s and Philips’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among coffee maker brands
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.