Brandwave

Cancer Society NZ vs Forest & Bird:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Forest & Bird had more branded searches than Cancer Society NZ among national charities in New Zealand. Forest & Bird had about 3,600 branded searches, while Cancer Society NZ had 1,910. Forest & Bird made up 4.4% of all national charity searches we track, and Cancer Society NZ accounted for 2.4%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about national charities, Forest & Bird appeared in three of the five answers and Cancer Society NZ in two. Cancer Society NZ was mentioned before Forest & Bird in two out of three answers.

Among national charities in New Zealand in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Forest & Bird, about 88% more searches than Cancer Society NZ

Forest & Bird 3.6K searchesCancer Society NZ 1.9K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Forest & Bird, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Cancer Society NZ in 2

Forest & Bird in 3 of 5Cancer Society NZ in 2 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Cancer Society NZ, named ahead of Forest & Bird in 2 of 3 answers

Cancer Society NZ first in 2Forest & Bird first in 1

Follow Cancer Society NZ vs Forest & Bird and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top national charities in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Forest & Bird was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Cancer Society NZ was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Cancer Society NZ was listed before Forest & Bird in two out of three answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Red Cross NZ1st
  2. Forest & Bird2nd
  3. Cancer Society NZ3rd
  4. Salvation Army NZ4th
  5. SPCA5th
  6. World Vision NZ–
  7. Hospice NZ–
  8. Starship Foundation–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Salvation Army NZ3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Forest & Bird3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Red Cross NZ2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Cancer Society NZ2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • SPCA1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • World Vision NZ0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Hospice NZ0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Starship Foundation0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about national charities

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 19, 2026.

Is Cancer Society NZ or Forest & Bird more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Cancer Society NZ and Forest & Bird by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine national charities we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.

Cancer Society NZ and Forest & Bird among national charities in New Zealand, by month

Share of searches by month for Forest & Bird, Cancer Society NZ. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthSPCASalvation Army NZRed Cross NZForest & BirdWorld Vision NZHospice NZCancer Society NZStarship Foundation
Oct 202542.8%35.4%10.1%2.6%3.2%2.7%2.1%0.98%
Nov 202542.8%35.5%10%2.6%3.2%2.7%2.1%1.1%
Dec 202537.9%46.1%7.1%1.9%2.5%2.3%1.3%0.88%
Jan 202641.1%40.8%9.1%1.7%2.1%2.8%1.7%0.79%
Feb 202636.8%42.6%9.8%1.8%3.3%2.5%2.2%1%
Mar 202642.3%34.7%9.7%2.6%4.3%2.7%2.6%1.1%
Apr 202646.6%32.7%8.7%1.9%4.2%3%1.9%0.9%
May 202645.9%31.4%8.8%2.2%5.2%3%2.2%1.2%
Jun 202642.9%29.2%8.8%5.9%8%2.4%1.8%1%
Jul 202650%28.8%9.7%2.5%3.4%2.7%2.1%0.95%
Aug 202648.3%28.1%10%2.3%4%2.7%3.6%0.94%
Sep 202647.9%28%9.6%4.4%3.9%2.8%2.4%0.91%

How has the Cancer Society NZ and Forest & Bird comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • The lead changed hands 4 times in the 12 months ending September 2026: Cancer Society NZ took it in January 2026, Forest & Bird took it in June 2026, Cancer Society NZ took it in August 2026, Forest & Bird took it in September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Cancer Society NZ’s share of searches among national charities in New Zealand moved from 2.1% to 2.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1.9K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Forest & Bird’s share of searches among national charities in New Zealand moved from 2.6% to 4.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 2.4K to 3.6K.

How did search popularity change for New Zealand national charities in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Forest & Bird overtook World Vision NZ and 2 others to rank 4th among national charities in New Zealand, with 4.4% of the searches.

  2. In September 2026, Cancer Society NZ lost share of searches among national charities in New Zealand, from 3.6% to 2.4%.

How are branded searches counted?

4 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Cancer Society NZ’s and Forest & Bird’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Cancer Society NZ

2 branded search terms

  • cancer society
  • cancer society nz donate

Forest & Bird

2 branded search terms

  • forest & bird
  • forest and bird

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among national charities

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.