Breezy HR vs Workable:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Workable had more branded searches than Breezy HR among applicant tracking systems in New Zealand. Workable had about 330 branded searches, while Breezy HR had 20. Workable made up 2.6% of all applicant tracking system searches we track, and Breezy HR accounted for 0.16%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about applicant tracking systems, Workable appeared in all five answers and Breezy HR in three. Workable was mentioned before Breezy HR in three out of five answers.
Who do people search for more?
Workable, about 17 searches for every 1 for Breezy HR
Who does AI mention more?
Workable, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Workable, named ahead of Breezy HR in 3 of 5 answers
Follow Breezy HR vs Workable and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top applicant tracking systems in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Workable appeared in all five answers. Breezy HR was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Workable was listed before Breezy HR in three out of five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
- Workable1st
Employment Hero2nd
Breezy HR3rd
Zoho Recruit4th
Teamtailor5th
JobAdder6th
BambooHR7th
Greenhouse8th
Lever9th
Bullhorn10th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Workable5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Employment Hero3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- BambooHR3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Zoho Recruit3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Breezy HR3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- JobAdder2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Teamtailor2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Greenhouse2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Bullhorn1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Lever1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about applicant tracking systems
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which applicant tracking system should I use in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best applicant tracking systems in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best applicant tracking system in New Zealand for a small hiring team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“applicant tracking systems”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best ats software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 20, 2026.
Is Breezy HR or Workable more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Breezy HR and Workable by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten applicant tracking systems we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for Workable, Breezy HR. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Employment Hero | BambooHR | JobAdder | Teamtailor | Workable | Zoho Recruit | Breezy HR | Greenhouse | Bullhorn | Lever |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 77.8% | 7.9% | 7% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 0.39% | 0.24% | 0.16% | 0.08% | 0.16% |
| Nov 2025 | 76.7% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 0.31% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Dec 2025 | 78% | 8.5% | 6.9% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 0.29% | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 75.8% | 9.4% | 6.8% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.19% | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Feb 2026 | 74.9% | 8.1% | 8.2% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| Mar 2026 | 71.2% | 13.7% | 7.2% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.22% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
| Apr 2026 | 70.4% | 13.9% | 7.7% | 3.4% | 3.5% | 0.43% | 0.17% | 0.35% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| May 2026 | 74.2% | 12% | 6.7% | 3% | 3% | 0.52% | 0.15% | 0.3% | 0% | 0.15% |
| Jun 2026 | 74% | 12% | 7.5% | 2.4% | 3% | 0.3% | 0.37% | 0.22% | 0.07% | 0.15% |
| Jul 2026 | 76% | 10% | 7.7% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 0.23% | 0.08% | 0.23% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Aug 2026 | 77.2% | 7.8% | 6.9% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.31% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Sep 2026 | 77.9% | 7.9% | 7% | 3.9% | 2.6% | 0.31% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
How has the Breezy HR and Workable comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Workable was ahead of Breezy HR in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Breezy HR’s share of searches among applicant tracking systems in New Zealand moved from 0.24% to 0.16%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 30 to 20.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Workable’s share of searches among applicant tracking systems in New Zealand moved from 3.1% to 2.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 400 to 330.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand applicant tracking systems in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Workable lost share of searches among applicant tracking systems in New Zealand, from 3.1% to 2.6%.
In September 2026, Breezy HR rose from 8th to 7th among applicant tracking systems in New Zealand.
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Breezy HR’s and Workable’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among applicant tracking systems
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.