Aveeno Baby vs Cetaphil:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Cetaphil had more branded searches than Aveeno Baby among baby skincare brands in New Zealand. Cetaphil had about 6,000 branded searches, while Aveeno Baby had 700. Cetaphil made up 30% of all baby skincare brand searches we track, and Aveeno Baby accounted for 3.5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about baby skincare brands, Cetaphil appeared in three of the five answers and Aveeno Baby in two. Aveeno Baby and Cetaphil were each mentioned first in two of the four answers.
Who do people search for more?
Cetaphil, about 9 searches for every 1 for Aveeno Baby
Who does AI mention more?
Cetaphil, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Aveeno Baby in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Each is named first in 2 of 4 answers.
Follow Aveeno Baby vs Cetaphil and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top baby skincare brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Cetaphil was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Aveeno Baby was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Aveeno Baby and Cetaphil were each listed first in two of the four answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
QV Skincare1st
MooGoo2nd
Cetaphil3rd
Aveeno Baby4th
ecostore5th
Weleda6th
Mustela7th
Gaia Skin Naturals–
Johnson's Baby–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
MooGoo4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
QV Skincare4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Weleda3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Cetaphil3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
ecostore2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Aveeno Baby2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Mustela1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Gaia Skin Naturals0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Johnson's Baby0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about baby skincare brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which baby skincare brand should I buy in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best baby skincare brands in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best baby skincare brand in New Zealand for sensitive skin?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“nappy cream nz”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“baby skincare brands nz”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 20, 2026.
Is Aveeno Baby or Cetaphil more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Aveeno Baby and Cetaphil by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine baby skincare brands we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for Cetaphil, Aveeno Baby. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Weleda | Cetaphil | MooGoo | ecostore | Mustela | Aveeno Baby | QV Skincare | Gaia Skin Naturals | Johnson's Baby |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 30.5% | 32.4% | 9.7% | 13.8% | 9.9% | 3.3% | 0.3% | 0.06% | 0% |
| Nov 2025 | 28.8% | 31.3% | 11% | 16.4% | 9% | 3.2% | 0.29% | 0.12% | 0.06% |
| Dec 2025 | 30.8% | 32.7% | 9.7% | 13.8% | 9.4% | 3.3% | 0.3% | 0.06% | 0% |
| Jan 2026 | 30.2% | 32.7% | 9.7% | 14.4% | 9% | 3.3% | 0.55% | 0.06% | 0% |
| Feb 2026 | 29.7% | 30.7% | 9.1% | 16.1% | 10.1% | 3.7% | 0.63% | 0.07% | 0% |
| Mar 2026 | 28.1% | 30.6% | 10.3% | 14.6% | 12% | 3.6% | 0.58% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
| Apr 2026 | 30.7% | 30.6% | 10.2% | 14.5% | 10.7% | 2.8% | 0.45% | 0.13% | 0% |
| May 2026 | 31.6% | 32.5% | 9.3% | 13.4% | 9.8% | 2.7% | 0.64% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
| Jun 2026 | 32.6% | 27.9% | 10.8% | 12.9% | 12.1% | 3.1% | 0.4% | 0.11% | 0.06% |
| Jul 2026 | 34.1% | 30.3% | 9.7% | 10.6% | 11.5% | 3.4% | 0.36% | 0.1% | 0.05% |
| Aug 2026 | 31.7% | 29.3% | 11.6% | 11.5% | 11.6% | 3.9% | 0.24% | 0.1% | 0.05% |
| Sep 2026 | 31% | 30% | 14.5% | 10.7% | 9.9% | 3.5% | 0.25% | 0.15% | 0.05% |
How has the Aveeno Baby and Cetaphil comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Cetaphil was ahead of Aveeno Baby in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Aveeno Baby’s share of searches among baby skincare brands in New Zealand moved from 3.3% to 3.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 550 to 700.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Cetaphil’s share of searches among baby skincare brands in New Zealand moved from 32.4% to 30%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 5.4K to 6K.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand baby skincare brands in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Cetaphil gained share of searches among baby skincare brands in New Zealand, from 29.3% to 30%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Aveeno Baby in New Zealand rose 27.3% over 12 measured months, from 550 to 700 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
6 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Aveeno Baby’s and Cetaphil’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Aveeno Baby
2 branded search terms
- aveeno baby eczema
- aveenobaby
Cetaphil
4 branded search terms
- cetaphil
- cetaphil lotion
- cetaphil serum
- cetaphil wash
Other head-to-heads among baby skincare brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.