Field Notes vs Kokuyo:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Field Notes had more branded searches than Kokuyo among notebook brands worldwide. Field Notes had about 113,000 branded searches, while Kokuyo had 59,400. Field Notes made up 12.3% of all notebook brand searches we track, and Kokuyo accounted for 6.5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about notebook brands, Kokuyo appeared in three of the five answers and Field Notes in one. Kokuyo was mentioned before Field Notes in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Field Notes, about 90% more searches than Kokuyo
Who does AI mention more?
Kokuyo, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Field Notes in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
Kokuyo, named ahead of Field Notes in 3 of 3 answers
Follow Field Notes vs Kokuyo and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top notebook brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Kokuyo was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Field Notes was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Kokuyo was listed before Field Notes in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Leuchtturm19171st
Midori2nd
Rhodia3rd
Five Star4th
Hobonichi5th
Kokuyo6th
Moleskine7th
Clairefontaine8th
Field Notes9th- Oxford–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Leuchtturm19175 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Midori4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Rhodia4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Hobonichi3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Kokuyo3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Five Star3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Moleskine2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Field Notes1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Clairefontaine1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Oxford0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about notebook brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which notebook brand should I buy?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best notebook brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best notebook brand for journaling?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“notebook brands”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“bullet journal notebook”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Field Notes or Kokuyo more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Field Notes and Kokuyo by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten notebook brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Field Notes, Kokuyo. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Hobonichi | Moleskine | Field Notes | Leuchtturm1917 | Kokuyo | Midori | Rhodia | Five Star | Clairefontaine | Oxford |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 25.9% | 31.5% | 11.8% | 14.2% | 7.2% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 1.3% | 0.56% | 0.69% |
| Nov 2025 | 27.1% | 33.2% | 10.2% | 14.8% | 6.1% | 3.6% | 3% | 0.89% | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Dec 2025 | 31.3% | 31.3% | 8.2% | 17.2% | 4.8% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 0.69% | 0.46% | 0.3% |
| Jan 2026 | 28.3% | 28.3% | 8.7% | 19% | 5.4% | 4.6% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 0.62% | 0.51% |
| Feb 2026 | 17.6% | 32.1% | 14.1% | 17.6% | 7.5% | 4.6% | 3.5% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Mar 2026 | 14.9% | 33.3% | 15.2% | 14.9% | 9.5% | 5% | 4.5% | 1.1% | 0.89% | 0.73% |
| Apr 2026 | 13% | 35.4% | 13.8% | 15.9% | 10.1% | 5.3% | 3.9% | 1.2% | 0.94% | 0.62% |
| May 2026 | 13% | 35.4% | 14.5% | 15.9% | 10.1% | 4.6% | 3.9% | 1.2% | 0.94% | 0.62% |
| Jun 2026 | 12.8% | 34.9% | 13.6% | 15.6% | 11.9% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 1.7% | 0.76% | 0.61% |
| Jul 2026 | 16.7% | 30.5% | 11.9% | 16.7% | 11% | 4.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 0.81% | 1.2% |
| Aug 2026 | 39% | 21.3% | 8.3% | 11.6% | 8% | 3.7% | 2.4% | 4.3% | 0.57% | 0.86% |
| Sep 2026 | 40.2% | 22% | 12.3% | 9.9% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 0.59% | 0.59% |
How has the Field Notes and Kokuyo comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Field Notes was ahead of Kokuyo in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Field Notes’ share of searches among notebook brands worldwide moved from 11.8% to 12.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 75.3K to 113K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Kokuyo’s share of searches among notebook brands worldwide moved from 7.2% to 6.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 45.9K to 59.4K.
How did search popularity change for notebook brands worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Field Notes overtook Leuchtturm1917 to rank 3rd among notebook brands worldwide, with 12.3% of the searches.

In September 2026, Kokuyo lost share of searches among notebook brands worldwide, from 8% to 6.5%.
How are branded searches counted?
4 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Field Notes’ and Kokuyo’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Field Notes
2 branded search terms
- field notes
- fieldnotes
Kokuyo
2 branded search terms
- kokuyo
- kokuyo campus
Other head-to-heads among notebook brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.