Adobe Acrobat vs iLovePDF:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, iLovePDF had more branded searches than Adobe Acrobat among PDF editors worldwide. iLovePDF had about 62.1 million branded searches, while Adobe Acrobat had 3.6 million. iLovePDF made up 86.1% of all PDF editor searches we track, and Adobe Acrobat accounted for 5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about PDF editors, Adobe Acrobat appeared in all five answers and iLovePDF in none.
Who do people search for more?
iLovePDF, about 17 searches for every 1 for Adobe Acrobat
Who does AI mention more?
Adobe Acrobat, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Adobe Acrobat, the only one of the two named
Follow Adobe Acrobat vs iLovePDF and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top PDF editors in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Adobe Acrobat appeared in all five answers. iLovePDF did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Adobe Acrobat1st
PDFgear2nd
Foxit3rd
PDF Expert4th
pdfFiller5th
PDF-XChange6th
PDFescape7th
iLovePDF–
Sejda–
Smallpdf–- +3 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Adobe Acrobat5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
PDFgear5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Foxit4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
PDF Expert3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
PDF-XChange2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
pdfFiller2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
PDFescape1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
iLovePDF0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Sejda0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Smallpdf0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about PDF editors
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which PDF editor should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best PDF editors?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best PDF editor for editing documents?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“pdf editors”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“edit pdf files”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 19, 2026.
Is Adobe Acrobat or iLovePDF more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Adobe Acrobat and iLovePDF by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 13 PDF editors we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for iLovePDF, Adobe Acrobat. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | iLovePDF | Adobe Acrobat | Sejda | Smallpdf | PDF24 | Foxit | PDFgear | PDF-XChange | PDFescape | Nitro | pdfFiller | Xodo | PDF Expert |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 82.4% | 7.3% | 3.3% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 0.88% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.45% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.11% | 0.06% |
| Nov 2025 | 83.7% | 6.2% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 0.78% | 0.3% | 0.41% | 0.37% | 0.2% | 0.17% | 0.11% | 0.06% |
| Dec 2025 | 83.4% | 5.9% | 3.7% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 0.83% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.33% | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.12% | 0.05% |
| Jan 2026 | 82.1% | 6.8% | 3.6% | 3% | 1.6% | 0.83% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.4% | 0.21% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.07% |
| Feb 2026 | 81.7% | 7.5% | 3.6% | 3.1% | 1.6% | 0.83% | 0.4% | 0.39% | 0.32% | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.1% | 0.05% |
| Mar 2026 | 83.4% | 6.4% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.45% | 0.3% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.09% | 0.06% |
| Apr 2026 | 84% | 5.8% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 0.78% | 0.46% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.17% | 0.17% | 0.09% | 0.05% |
| May 2026 | 84% | 6.1% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.09% | 0.05% |
| Jun 2026 | 85.4% | 5.3% | 3.1% | 2.9% | 1.4% | 0.61% | 0.34% | 0.34% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.07% | 0.04% |
| Jul 2026 | 84.4% | 5.8% | 3.4% | 2.6% | 1.5% | 0.69% | 0.46% | 0.37% | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.14% | 0.08% | 0.04% |
| Aug 2026 | 85.5% | 5% | 3.5% | 2.4% | 1.5% | 0.68% | 0.38% | 0.35% | 0.25% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.08% | 0.04% |
| Sep 2026 | 86.1% | 5% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 0.63% | 0.34% | 0.34% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.13% | 0.07% | 0.04% |
How has the Adobe Acrobat and iLovePDF comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- iLovePDF was ahead of Adobe Acrobat in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Adobe Acrobat’s share of searches among PDF editors worldwide moved from 7.3% to 5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.9M to 3.6M.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, iLovePDF’s share of searches among PDF editors worldwide moved from 82.4% to 86.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 55.3M to 62.1M.
How did search popularity change for PDF editors worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, iLovePDF gained share of searches among PDF editors worldwide, from 85.5% to 86.1%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Adobe Acrobat worldwide fell 25.5% over 12 measured months, from 4.9M to 3.6M in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
6 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Adobe Acrobat’s and iLovePDF’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Adobe Acrobat
4 branded search terms
- acrobat reader
- adobe acrobat
- adobe acrobat reader
- adobe reader
iLovePDF
2 branded search terms
- i love pdf
- ilovepdf
Other head-to-heads among PDF editors

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.