Brandwave

How popular isHoneycomb?

In September 2026, people searched for Honeycomb by name about 1,610 times worldwide, a 37.1% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 0.17% of all global observability platform searches, placing Honeycomb ninth out of nine platforms. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about observability platforms, Honeycomb appeared in three of the five answers and was the fifth most recommended of the nine.

Search and AI answers in September 2026

Honeycomb is the ninth most searched of 9 competitors and the fifth most recommended in AI answers.

  1. GrafanaShare of searches 34%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
  2. DatadogShare of searches 25.9%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
  3. SplunkShare of searches 14.9%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 6th
  4. DynatraceShare of searches 9.4%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
  5. HoneycombShare of searches 0.17%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th

+4 more

Honeycomb website (opens in a new tab)

Follow Honeycomb and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Top observability platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Honeycomb was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Honeycomb is the fifth most recommended of the nine.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Datadog1st
  2. Grafana2nd
  3. Dynatrace3rd
  4. New Relic4th
  5. Honeycomb5th
  6. Splunk6th
  7. AppDynamics7th
  8. SigNoz8th
  9. Elastic9th

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Grafana5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Datadog5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • New Relic5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Dynatrace4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Honeycomb3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Splunk2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Elastic2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • SigNoz2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • AppDynamics2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about observability platforms

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

Which observability platforms compete with Honeycomb?

Honeycomb against observability platforms worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Grafana, Datadog, Splunk, Dynatrace, Elastic, New Relic, Honeycomb. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthGrafanaDatadogSplunkDynatraceElasticNew RelicSigNozAppDynamicsHoneycomb
Oct 202529.1%21.9%18%9.6%10%8%1.6%1.6%0.22%
Nov 202531.2%23.5%16%8.6%9%8.7%1.7%1.1%0.24%
Dec 202533.4%21%17.3%7.6%9.7%7.7%1.8%1.2%0.24%
Jan 202631.6%23.9%16.3%8.7%9.2%7.2%1.7%1.1%0.21%
Feb 202632.2%24.3%16.7%8.8%9.1%6.1%1.7%0.94%0.21%
Mar 202635.4%22.2%15.6%9.7%8.4%5.5%1.9%1%0.19%
Apr 202632.8%24.4%17%8.9%7.6%6.1%2.1%0.95%0.17%
May 202633.6%25.4%14.4%9.2%7.9%6.2%1.8%1.2%0.17%
Jun 202632.6%24.9%16.9%9%6.3%7.4%1.8%0.97%0.17%
Jul 202633.9%25.8%14.7%9.3%6.6%6.4%2.3%0.82%0.18%
Aug 202634.1%25.8%14.8%9.4%6.6%6.4%1.8%0.83%0.21%
Sep 202634%25.9%14.9%9.4%6.6%6.4%1.9%0.83%0.17%
  1. 1.Grafana

    34%

    Held 1st. 331K estimated branded searches, -1% vs prior month. Share -0.2 points.

  2. 2.Datadog

    25.9%

    Held 2nd. 252K estimated branded searches, -0.34% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.

  3. 3.Splunk

    14.9%

    Held 3rd. 145K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.

  4. 4.Dynatrace

    9.4%

    Held 4th. 92K estimated branded searches, +0.11% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.

  5. 5.Elastic

    6.6%

    Held 5th. 64.1K estimated branded searches, -1.2% vs prior month. Share 0 points.

  6. 6.New Relic

    6.4%

    Held 6th. 62.3K estimated branded searches, -0.06% vs prior month. Share 0 points.

  7. 7.SigNoz

    1.9%

    Held 7th. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.

  8. Held 8th. 8.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.

  9. 9.Honeycomb

    0.17%

    Held 9th. 1.6K estimated branded searches, -20.7% vs prior month. Share 0 points.

Compare popularity between Honeycomb and its closest rivals

Every comparison with Honeycomb

3 comparisons

How has branded search demand for Honeycomb changed worldwide over the last 12 months?

2 findings
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Honeycomb worldwide fell from 2.6K to 1.6K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Honeycomb’s share of searches among observability platforms worldwide held steady, from 0.22% to 0.17%.

How did search popularity change for observability platforms worldwide in September 2026?

6 changes
  1. Datadog’s share of searches among observability platforms worldwide has gained ground for 3 months in a row, from 24.9% to 25.9% in September 2026.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for AppDynamics worldwide fell 55.2% over 12 measured months, from 18.1K to 8.1K in September 2026.

  3. Estimated monthly branded searches for Elastic worldwide fell 45% over 12 measured months, from 117K to 64.1K in September 2026.

  4. Estimated monthly branded searches for Honeycomb worldwide fell 37.1% over 12 measured months, from 2.6K to 1.6K in September 2026.

  5. Estimated monthly branded searches for New Relic worldwide fell 33.2% over 12 measured months, from 93.2K to 62.3K in September 2026.

  6. Estimated monthly branded searches for Splunk worldwide fell 30.7% over 12 measured months, from 209K to 145K in September 2026.

How are Honeycomb’s branded searches counted?

5 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Honeycomb’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.

  • honeycomb apm
  • honeycomb io
  • honeycomb monitoring
  • honeycomb observability
  • observability honeycomb

Do you work for Honeycomb? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Where does Honeycomb compete?

Honeycomb is ranked in two competitor sets. Each share is worked out among that set's brands, so it differs from set to set.
Competitor setRankShare of searchesRanking
Observability platforms9th of 90.17%Shown above
Distributed tracing platforms7th of 7<0.01%Show ranking
Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Is Honeycomb your brand?

Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.