How popular isCaran d’Ache?
In September 2026, people searched for Caran d’Ache by name about 110,000 times worldwide, about the same as the previous year. These searches made up 8.3% of all global art supply brand searches, placing Caran d’Ache fourth out of 15 brands. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about art supply brands, Caran d’Ache appeared in three of the five answers and was the fourth most recommended of the 15.
Caran d’Ache is the fourth most searched of 15 competitors and the fourth most recommended in AI answers.
Faber-CastellShare of searches 27.7%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
CrayolaShare of searches 15.1%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 11th
OhuhuShare of searches 12.4%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 10th
Caran d’AcheShare of searches 8.3%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
PoscaShare of searches 8.3%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
Follow Caran d’Ache and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top art supply brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Caran d’Ache was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Caran d’Ache is the fourth most recommended of the 15.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Faber-Castell1st
Prismacolor2nd
Winsor & Newton3rd
Caran d’Ache4th
Liquitex5th
Daniel Smith6th
Staedtler7th
Copic8th
Sakura9th
Ohuhu10th- +5 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Faber-Castell5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Prismacolor5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Caran d’Ache3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Winsor & Newton3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Liquitex3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Crayola2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Ohuhu2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Staedtler2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Sakura2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Copic2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about art supply brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which art supply brand should I buy?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best art supply brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best art supply brand for everyday drawing?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“art supply brands”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best art supplies”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Which art supply brands compete with Caran d’Ache?
Share of searches by month for Faber-Castell, Crayola, Ohuhu, Caran d’Ache, Posca, Prismacolor, Staedtler, Pentel, Winsor & Newton, Sakura, Copic. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Faber-Castell | Crayola | Ohuhu | Caran d’Ache | Posca | Prismacolor | Staedtler | Pentel | Winsor & Newton | Sakura | Copic | Derwent | Liquitex | Daniel Smith | Arteza |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 26.8% | 14.6% | 9.8% | 8% | 12% | 5.4% | 6.6% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 2% | 1.3% | 0.88% | <0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 24.9% | 13.6% | 13.6% | 9.1% | 13.6% | 5% | 5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 2.3% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1% | 1% | <0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 23.2% | 12.7% | 12.7% | 10.4% | 15.5% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 2.6% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.93% | <0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 31.3% | 11.5% | 11.5% | 7.7% | 9.4% | 5.2% | 6.3% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1% | <0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 29.5% | 13.2% | 10.8% | 7.2% | 10.8% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 4% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.97% | <0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 24.4% | 16.3% | 11% | 7.3% | 11% | 4.9% | 6% | 4.9% | 4% | 3.2% | 2.7% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.2% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 25.1% | 16.7% | 11.2% | 7.5% | 11.2% | 5% | 5% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 25% | 16.7% | 11.2% | 7.5% | 11.2% | 5% | 5% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 22% | 17.9% | 12.1% | 8.1% | 9.8% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.2% | 3% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.1% | <0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 24.5% | 16.4% | 13.5% | 7.4% | 9% | 6% | 4.9% | 4% | 3.3% | 4.6% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.99% | <0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 30.4% | 16.6% | 9.1% | 7.4% | 7.4% | 7.4% | 5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 4.6% | 2.2% | 1.2% | 1% | 0.82% | <0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 27.7% | 15.1% | 12.4% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 3.6% | 2.5% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.91% | <0.01% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 27.7% | 368K | -18.2% | -2.7 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 15.1% | 201K | -18.3% | -1.5 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 12.4% | 165K | +22.2% | +3.3 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 8.3% | 110K | 0% | +0.9 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 8.3% | 110K | 0% | +0.9 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 5.6% | 74K | -32.7% | -1.9 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 5.6% | 74K | 0% | +0.6 points | |
| 8, moved from 9th to 8th | 3.7% | 49.5K | 0% | +0.4 pointsmoved from 9th to 8th | |
| 9, moved from 10th to 9th | 3.7% | 49.5K | 0% | +0.4 pointsmoved from 10th to 9th | |
| 10, moved from 8th to 10th | 3.6% | 48.4K | -29.2% | -1 pointsmoved from 8th to 10th | |
| 11, held 11th | 2.5% | 33.1K | 0% | +0.3 points | |
| 12, held 12th | 1.4% | 18.1K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 13, held 13th | 1.1% | 14.8K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 14, held 14th | 0.91% | 12.1K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 15, held 15th | <0.01% | 40 | 0% | 0 points |
27.7%
Held 1st. 368K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -2.7 points.
2.
Crayola15.1%
Held 2nd. 201K estimated branded searches, -18.3% vs prior month. Share -1.5 points.
3.
Ohuhu12.4%
Held 3rd. 165K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +3.3 points.
8.3%
Held 4th. 110K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
5.
Posca8.3%
Held 5th. 110K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
5.6%
Held 6th. 74K estimated branded searches, -32.7% vs prior month. Share -1.9 points.
5.6%
Held 7th. 74K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.6 points.
8.
Pentel3.7%
Moved from 9th to 8th. 49.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
3.7%
Moved from 10th to 9th. 49.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
10.
Sakura3.6%
Moved from 8th to 10th. 48.4K estimated branded searches, -29.2% vs prior month. Share -1 points.
11.
Copic2.5%
Held 11th. 33.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
12.
Derwent1.4%
Held 12th. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
13.
Liquitex1.1%
Held 13th. 14.8K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
14.
Daniel Smith0.91%
Held 14th. 12.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
15.
Arteza<0.01%
Held 15th. 40 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Caran d’Ache and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Caran d’Ache
13 comparisons
- Caran d’Ache vs Crayola
- Caran d’Ache vs Faber-Castell
- Caran d’Ache vs Ohuhu
- Caran d’Ache vs Posca
- Caran d’Ache vs Prismacolor
- Caran d’Ache vs Staedtler
- Caran d’Ache vs Pentel
- Caran d’Ache vs Winsor & Newton
- Caran d’Ache vs Sakura
- Caran d’Ache vs Copic
- Caran d’Ache vs Derwent
- Caran d’Ache vs Liquitex
- Caran d’Ache vs Daniel Smith
How has branded search demand for Caran d’Ache changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Caran d’Ache worldwide held steady at 110K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Caran d’Ache’s share of searches among art supply brands worldwide peaked at 10.4% in December 2025 and was lowest at 7.2% in February 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Caran d’Ache rose from 5th to 4th among art supply brands worldwide.
How did search popularity change for art supply brands worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Ohuhu gained share of searches among art supply brands worldwide, from 9.1% to 12.4%.

In September 2026, Caran d’Ache gained share of searches among art supply brands worldwide, from 7.4% to 8.3%.

In September 2026, Posca gained share of searches among art supply brands worldwide, from 7.4% to 8.3%.

In September 2026, Staedtler gained share of searches among art supply brands worldwide, from 5% to 5.6%.

In September 2026, Faber-Castell lost share of searches among art supply brands worldwide, from 30.4% to 27.7%.

In September 2026, Prismacolor lost share of searches among art supply brands worldwide, from 7.4% to 5.6%.
How are Caran d’Ache’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Caran d’Ache’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- caran d ache
Do you work for Caran d’Ache? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Caran d’Ache your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.