Kendall-Jackson vs Meiomi:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Kendall-Jackson had more branded searches than Meiomi among wine brands in the United States. Kendall-Jackson had about 12,100 branded searches, while Meiomi had 4,400. Kendall-Jackson made up 7.8% of all wine brand searches we track, and Meiomi accounted for 2.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about wine brands, Kendall-Jackson appeared in two of the five answers and Meiomi in none.
Who do people search for more?
Kendall-Jackson, about 3 searches for every 1 for Meiomi
Who does AI mention more?
Kendall-Jackson, mentioned in 2 of 5 answers, Meiomi in 0
Who does AI recommend more?
Kendall-Jackson, the only one of the two named
Follow Kendall-Jackson vs Meiomi and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top wine brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Kendall-Jackson was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Meiomi did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Josh Cellars1st
Barefoot2nd
Kendall-Jackson3rd
Bota Box4th
Yellow Tail5th
Apothic6th
Black Box7th
Kim Crawford8th
La Crema–- +2 more
Meiomi–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Barefoot3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Josh Cellars3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Kendall-Jackson2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Kim Crawford2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Black Box1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Yellow Tail1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Bota Box1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Apothic1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
La Crema0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Meiomi0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about wine brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“What's a good cheap wine at the grocery store?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which wine brands are best for a party?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Is boxed wine any good, and which brand should I buy?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“wine brands”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best cheap wine”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United States on October 27, 2026.
Is Kendall-Jackson or Meiomi more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Kendall-Jackson and Meiomi by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 12 wine brands we track, month by month, from searches in United States.
Share of searches by month for Kendall-Jackson, Meiomi. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Barefoot | Kendall-Jackson | La Crema | Kim Crawford | Black Box | 19 Crimes | Josh Cellars | Yellow Tail | Bota Box | Woodbridge | Meiomi | Apothic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 35% | 5.7% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 5.7% | 7% | 4.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 3.1% |
| Nov 2025 | 34.5% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 15.5% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 8.4% | 5.6% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 2.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 39.3% | 4.3% | 6.4% | 7.9% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 9.6% | 6.4% | 2.9% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.9% |
| Jan 2026 | 42% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 3.7% | 2.5% |
| Feb 2026 | 39.7% | 5.3% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 2.9% |
| Mar 2026 | 32.8% | 5.3% | 12% | 8% | 12% | 4.4% | 8% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| Apr 2026 | 39.6% | 5.3% | 9.7% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| May 2026 | 38.6% | 5.2% | 11.6% | 9.4% | 6.3% | 4.2% | 7.7% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 2.3% |
| Jun 2026 | 35.6% | 5.8% | 10.6% | 8.7% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 10.6% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 4.7% | 3.2% | 2.5% |
| Jul 2026 | 40.3% | 5.4% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 8.1% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| Aug 2026 | 42.3% | 5.7% | 8.5% | 10.3% | 5.7% | 3.8% | 5.7% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 2% |
| Sep 2026 | 47.8% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 6.4% | 5.2% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.3% |
How has the Kendall-Jackson and Meiomi comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Kendall-Jackson was ahead of Meiomi in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Kendall-Jackson’s share of searches among wine brands in the United States moved from 5.7% to 7.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 8.1K to 12.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Meiomi’s share of searches among wine brands in the United States moved from 4.7% to 2.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 6.6K to 4.4K.
How did search popularity change for United States wine brands in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Kendall-Jackson overtook Kim Crawford and 3 others to rank 2nd among wine brands in the United States, with 7.8% of the searches.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Meiomi in the United States fell 33.3% over 12 measured months, from 6.6K to 4.4K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Kendall-Jackson’s and Meiomi’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Kendall-Jackson
1 branded search term
- kendall jackson
Meiomi
1 branded search term
- meiomi
Other head-to-heads among wine brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.