Kendall-Jackson vs Kim Crawford:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Kendall-Jackson had more branded searches than Kim Crawford among wine brands in the United States. Kendall-Jackson had about 12,100 branded searches, while Kim Crawford had 9,900. Kendall-Jackson made up 7.8% of all wine brand searches we track, and Kim Crawford accounted for 6.4%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about wine brands, Kendall-Jackson and Kim Crawford each appeared in two of the five answers. Kendall-Jackson was mentioned before Kim Crawford in two out of three answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Kendall-Jackson, about 22% more searches than Kim Crawford
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 2 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
Kendall-Jackson, named ahead of Kim Crawford in 2 of 3 answers
Follow Kendall-Jackson vs Kim Crawford and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top wine brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Kendall-Jackson and Kim Crawford were each mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Kendall-Jackson was listed before Kim Crawford in two out of three answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Barefoot3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Josh Cellars3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- Kendall-Jackson2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Kim Crawford2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Black Box1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Yellow Tail1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Bota Box1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Apothic1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
La Crema0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
19 Crimes0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about wine brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“What's a good cheap wine at the grocery store?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which wine brands are best for a party?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Is boxed wine any good, and which brand should I buy?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“wine brands”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best cheap wine”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United States on October 27, 2026.
Is Kendall-Jackson or Kim Crawford more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Kendall-Jackson and Kim Crawford by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 12 wine brands we track, month by month, from searches in United States.
Share of searches by month for Kendall-Jackson, Kim Crawford. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Barefoot | Kendall-Jackson | La Crema | Kim Crawford | Black Box | 19 Crimes | Josh Cellars | Yellow Tail | Bota Box | Woodbridge | Meiomi | Apothic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 35% | 5.7% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 5.7% | 7% | 4.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 3.1% |
| Nov 2025 | 34.5% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 15.5% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 8.4% | 5.6% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 2.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 39.3% | 4.3% | 6.4% | 7.9% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 9.6% | 6.4% | 2.9% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.9% |
| Jan 2026 | 42% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 3.7% | 2.5% |
| Feb 2026 | 39.7% | 5.3% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 2.9% |
| Mar 2026 | 32.8% | 5.3% | 12% | 8% | 12% | 4.4% | 8% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| Apr 2026 | 39.6% | 5.3% | 9.7% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| May 2026 | 38.6% | 5.2% | 11.6% | 9.4% | 6.3% | 4.2% | 7.7% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 2.3% |
| Jun 2026 | 35.6% | 5.8% | 10.6% | 8.7% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 10.6% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 4.7% | 3.2% | 2.5% |
| Jul 2026 | 40.3% | 5.4% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 8.1% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| Aug 2026 | 42.3% | 5.7% | 8.5% | 10.3% | 5.7% | 3.8% | 5.7% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 2% |
| Sep 2026 | 47.8% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 6.4% | 5.2% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.3% |
How has the Kendall-Jackson and Kim Crawford comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- The lead changed hands once in the 12 months ending September 2026: Kendall-Jackson took it in September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Kendall-Jackson’s share of searches among wine brands in the United States moved from 5.7% to 7.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 8.1K to 12.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Kim Crawford’s share of searches among wine brands in the United States moved from 8.6% to 6.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 12.1K to 9.9K.
How did search popularity change for United States wine brands in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Kendall-Jackson overtook Kim Crawford and 3 others to rank 2nd among wine brands in the United States, with 7.8% of the searches.
In September 2026, Kim Crawford lost share of searches among wine brands in the United States, from 10.3% to 6.4%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Kendall-Jackson’s and Kim Crawford’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Kendall-Jackson
1 branded search term
- kendall jackson
Kim Crawford
1 branded search term
- kim crawford
Other head-to-heads among wine brands
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.