Frenelle Jewellery vs Thomas Sabo:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Thomas Sabo had more branded searches than Frenelle Jewellery among jewellery charm brands in New Zealand. Thomas Sabo had about 280 branded searches, while Frenelle Jewellery had 50. Thomas Sabo made up 0.83% of all jewellery charm brand searches we track, and Frenelle Jewellery accounted for 0.15%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about jewellery charm brands, Frenelle Jewellery appeared in three of the five answers and Thomas Sabo in one. Frenelle Jewellery was mentioned before Thomas Sabo in three out of four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Thomas Sabo, about 6 searches for every 1 for Frenelle Jewellery
Who does AI mention more?
Frenelle Jewellery, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Thomas Sabo in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
Frenelle Jewellery, named ahead of Thomas Sabo in 3 of 4 answers
Follow Frenelle Jewellery vs Thomas Sabo and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top jewellery charm brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Frenelle Jewellery was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Thomas Sabo was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Frenelle Jewellery was listed before Thomas Sabo in three out of four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Pandora5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Evolve Inspired Jewellery5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Lullaboo3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Frenelle Jewellery3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Thomas Sabo1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Swarovski0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Tiffany & Co.0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Meadowlark0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Mejuri0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about jewellery charm brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which jewellery charm brand should I buy in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best jewellery charm brands in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best jewellery charm brand in New Zealand for a charm bracelet?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“bracelet charms nz”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“jewellery charms nz”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 21, 2026.
Is Frenelle Jewellery or Thomas Sabo more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Frenelle Jewellery and Thomas Sabo by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine jewellery charm brands we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for Thomas Sabo, Frenelle Jewellery. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Pandora | Swarovski | Tiffany & Co. | Meadowlark | Evolve Inspired Jewellery | Mejuri | Thomas Sabo | Lullaboo | Frenelle Jewellery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 35.8% | 30.8% | 25.8% | 1.4% | 2.9% | 2% | 0.88% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
| Nov 2025 | 35.4% | 36.6% | 20.8% | 1.3% | 2.9% | 2% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.09% |
| Dec 2025 | 40.4% | 34.1% | 19.4% | 1.3% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.63% | 0.37% | 0.07% |
| Jan 2026 | 30.8% | 33.4% | 28.2% | 1.8% | 3% | 1.7% | 0.76% | 0.23% | 0.1% |
| Feb 2026 | 32.8% | 31.9% | 26.9% | 2.1% | 3.3% | 1.7% | 0.88% | 0.27% | 0.15% |
| Mar 2026 | 26.4% | 39% | 26.4% | 2.5% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 0.66% | 0.26% | 0.14% |
| Apr 2026 | 31% | 33% | 27.4% | 2.2% | 3.1% | 2% | 0.81% | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| May 2026 | 33.1% | 34.9% | 23.9% | 2.3% | 2.7% | 1.9% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.13% |
| Jun 2026 | 32.8% | 32% | 27% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 1.9% | 0.82% | 0.26% | 0.15% |
| Jul 2026 | 32.6% | 32.3% | 26.5% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 0.9% | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Aug 2026 | 33.5% | 29% | 29.2% | 2.6% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 1% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
| Sep 2026 | 33.3% | 32.1% | 26.7% | 3% | 2% | 1.6% | 0.83% | 0.33% | 0.15% |
How has the Frenelle Jewellery and Thomas Sabo comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Thomas Sabo was ahead of Frenelle Jewellery in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Frenelle Jewellery’s share of searches among jewellery charm brands in New Zealand moved from 0.11% to 0.15%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 40 to 50.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Thomas Sabo’s share of searches among jewellery charm brands in New Zealand moved from 0.88% to 0.83%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 310 to 280.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand jewellery charm brands in September 2026?
1 change

Estimated monthly branded searches for Frenelle Jewellery in New Zealand rose 25% over 12 measured months, from 40 to 50 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
4 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Frenelle Jewellery’s and Thomas Sabo’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Frenelle Jewellery
1 branded search term
- frenelle
Thomas Sabo
3 branded search terms
- thomas sabo
- thomas sabo jewellery
- thomassabo
Other head-to-heads among jewellery charm brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.