Fab vs Quixel Megascans:Which is more popular in New Zealand?
In October 2026, Fab had more branded searches than Quixel Megascans among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand. Fab had about 50 branded searches, while Quixel Megascans had 30. Fab made up 4.1% of all 3D texture and asset library searches we track, and Quixel Megascans accounted for 2.5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about 3D texture and asset libraries, Quixel Megascans appeared in all four answers and Fab in three. Fab was mentioned before Quixel Megascans in three out of four answers.
Who do people search for more?
Fab, about 67% more searches than Quixel Megascans
Who does AI mention more?
Quixel Megascans, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Fab, named ahead of Quixel Megascans in 3 of 4 answers
Follow Fab vs Quixel Megascans and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top 3D texture and asset libraries in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, Quixel Megascans appeared in all four answers. Fab was mentioned in three out of four: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. Fab was listed before Quixel Megascans in three out of four answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Poly Haven1st- Fab2nd
ambientCG3rd- Quixel Megascans4th
Synty Studios5th
Poliigon6th
Textures.com7th
CGAxis–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Poly Haven4 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- Quixel Megascans4 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- ambientCG3 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- Fab3 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
- Poliigon2 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- Synty Studios2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
- Textures.com2 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- CGAxis0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
See every answer about 3D texture and asset libraries
4 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which 3D texture and asset library should I use in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best 3D texture and asset library in New Zealand for game art assets?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“3d texture library”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“pbr texture library”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 20, 2026.
Is Fab or Quixel Megascans more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Fab and Quixel Megascans by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight 3D texture and asset libraries we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for Fab, Quixel Megascans. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Poly Haven | Poliigon | ambientCG | Synty Studios | Fab | Textures.com | Quixel Megascans | CGAxis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2025 | 45.5% | 22.1% | 6.5% | 14.3% | 3.9% | 2.6% | 3.9% | 1.3% |
| Dec 2025 | 44.2% | 21.2% | 5.8% | 11.5% | 5.8% | 1.9% | 7.7% | 1.9% |
| Jan 2026 | 43.8% | 21.9% | 4.7% | 12.5% | 6.3% | 3.1% | 6.3% | 1.6% |
| Feb 2026 | 58.1% | 12.2% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 2.7% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 1.4% |
| Mar 2026 | 58.6% | 12.6% | 8.1% | 10.8% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 0.9% |
| Apr 2026 | 53.4% | 12.5% | 8% | 14.8% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 4.5% | 1.1% |
| May 2026 | 58.7% | 17.4% | 7.4% | 8.3% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 0.83% |
| Jun 2026 | 57.1% | 15.2% | 8% | 11.6% | 3.6% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.89% |
| Jul 2026 | 59.1% | 10% | 8.2% | 12.7% | 4.5% | 1.8% | 2.7% | 0.91% |
| Aug 2026 | 57.7% | 12.6% | 9.9% | 9% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 3.6% | 0.9% |
| Sep 2026 | 55.8% | 10.6% | 13.5% | 11.5% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 1.9% | 0.96% |
| Oct 2026 | 52.9% | 14% | 11.6% | 10.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 2.5% | 0.83% |
How has branded search for Fab and Quixel Megascans changed in New Zealand over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- The lead changed hands 3 times in the 12 months ending October 2026: Fab took it in March 2026, Quixel Megascans took it in April 2026, Fab took it in June 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending October 2026, Fab’s share of searches among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand moved from 3.9% to 4.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 30 to 50.
- Across the 12 months ending October 2026, Quixel Megascans’ share of searches among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand moved from 3.9% to 2.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 30.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand 3D texture and asset libraries in October 2026?
2 changes
In October 2026, Fab gained share of searches among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand, from 2.9% to 4.1%.
In October 2026, Quixel Megascans gained share of searches among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand, from 1.9% to 2.5%.
How are Fab’s and Quixel Megascans’ branded searches counted?
4 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Fab’s and Quixel Megascans’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Fab
3 branded search terms
- fab epic
- fab marketplace
- fab.com
Quixel Megascans
1 branded search term
- quixel megascans
Other head-to-heads among 3D texture and asset libraries
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.