Coverstaff vs Frog Recruitment:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Coverstaff had more branded searches than Frog Recruitment among Auckland recruitment agencies in New Zealand. Coverstaff had about 4,020 branded searches, while Frog Recruitment had 390. Coverstaff made up 38.8% of all Auckland recruitment agency searches we track, and Frog Recruitment accounted for 3.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about Auckland recruitment agencies, Frog Recruitment appeared in all three answers and Coverstaff in none.
Who do people search for more?
Coverstaff, about 10 searches for every 1 for Frog Recruitment
Who does AI mention more?
Frog Recruitment, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Frog Recruitment, the only one of the two named
Follow Coverstaff vs Frog Recruitment and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top Auckland recruitment agencies in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions, Frog Recruitment appeared in all three answers. Coverstaff did not appear in any of the three answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Frog Recruitment3 of 3Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answers
84 Recruitment3 of 3Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Hirestaff2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers- Tribe Recruitment2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Hays1 of 3Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answers- Coverstaff0 of 3Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Madison Recruitment0 of 3Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Alpha Recruitment0 of 3Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Randstad0 of 3Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answers
See every answer about Auckland recruitment agencies
3 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which recruitment agency should I hire in Auckland, New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best recruitment agencies in Auckland, New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best recruitment agency in Auckland, New Zealand for staffing help?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“auckland recruitment agency”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Searched Google, AI Overview
“employment agency auckland”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 20, 2026.
Is Coverstaff or Frog Recruitment more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Coverstaff and Frog Recruitment by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine Auckland recruitment agencies we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for Coverstaff, Frog Recruitment. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Coverstaff | Hirestaff | Madison Recruitment | Tribe Recruitment | Alpha Recruitment | Randstad | Hays | Frog Recruitment | 84 Recruitment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 42.8% | 8.9% | 9.1% | 14.2% | 5.7% | 10% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 1.9% |
| Nov 2025 | 43.2% | 13% | 8.3% | 13% | 5.3% | 4.9% | 5.9% | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 42.8% | 12.2% | 10.9% | 12.2% | 6.3% | 5.1% | 5.8% | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 43% | 12.9% | 13% | 10.5% | 5.2% | 4.3% | 5.9% | 3.1% | 2.1% |
| Feb 2026 | 39.9% | 14.8% | 12.2% | 9.2% | 6.1% | 4.7% | 6.6% | 3% | 3.6% |
| Mar 2026 | 39.1% | 10.5% | 13.1% | 10.5% | 7.8% | 5.4% | 7.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Apr 2026 | 39.1% | 11.8% | 9.2% | 11.8% | 8.7% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 3.5% | 2.9% |
| May 2026 | 38.9% | 14.4% | 11.9% | 9% | 8.5% | 5.3% | 5.4% | 4.3% | 2.3% |
| Jun 2026 | 40.1% | 14.8% | 9.5% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 4.6% | 5.6% | 4.5% | 3% |
| Jul 2026 | 39.6% | 14.7% | 12.1% | 9.2% | 7.2% | 6.3% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 2.9% |
| Aug 2026 | 41.7% | 13.8% | 8.8% | 11.2% | 6.7% | 6.1% | 4.2% | 4.1% | 3.4% |
| Sep 2026 | 38.8% | 15.4% | 9.8% | 9.6% | 7.6% | 6.7% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 2.5% |
How has the Coverstaff and Frog Recruitment comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Coverstaff was ahead of Frog Recruitment in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Coverstaff’s share of searches among Auckland recruitment agencies in New Zealand moved from 42.8% to 38.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.8K to 4K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Frog Recruitment’s share of searches among Auckland recruitment agencies in New Zealand moved from 2.3% to 3.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 260 to 390.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand Auckland recruitment agencies in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Coverstaff lost share of searches among Auckland recruitment agencies in New Zealand, from 41.7% to 38.8%.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Frog Recruitment in New Zealand rose 50% over 12 measured months, from 260 to 390 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
5 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Coverstaff’s and Frog Recruitment’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Coverstaff
4 branded search terms
- coverstaff
- coverstaff manukau
- coverstaff recruitment
- coverstaff rosebank
Frog Recruitment
1 branded search term
- Frog Recruitment
Other head-to-heads among Auckland recruitment agencies
- Coverstaff vs Hirestaff: compare popularity
- Coverstaff vs Madison Recruitment: compare popularity
- Coverstaff vs Tribe Recruitment: compare popularity
- Coverstaff vs Alpha Recruitment: compare popularity
- Hirestaff vs Madison Recruitment: compare popularity
- Hirestaff vs Tribe Recruitment: compare popularity
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.