OANDA vs Wise:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, OANDA had more branded searches than Wise among currency converter software worldwide. OANDA had about 450,000 branded searches, while Wise had 354,000. OANDA made up 40.9% of all currency converter software searches we track, and Wise accounted for 32.2%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about currency converter software, Wise appeared in all five answers and OANDA in four. Wise was mentioned before OANDA in every answer.
Follow OANDA vs Wise and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top currency converter software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Wise appeared in all five answers. OANDA was mentioned in four out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Wise was listed before OANDA in every answer.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
See every answer about currency converter software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which currency converter software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best currency converter software options?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best currency converter software for international payments?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“currency conversion tool”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best currency converter”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is OANDA or Wise more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for OANDA and Wise by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all four currency converter software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for OANDA, Wise. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | OANDA | Wise | Xe | OFX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 46% | 29.3% | 20.6% | 4.1% |
| Nov 2025 | 41.2% | 31.8% | 22.5% | 4.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 40.2% | 33.5% | 22% | 4.4% |
| Jan 2026 | 44.7% | 31.3% | 20% | 4% |
| Feb 2026 | 41.7% | 31% | 22.8% | 4.6% |
| Mar 2026 | 45.5% | 30.1% | 20.3% | 4.1% |
| Apr 2026 | 41.1% | 32.8% | 22.5% | 3.7% |
| May 2026 | 41.3% | 32.4% | 22.6% | 3.7% |
| Jun 2026 | 41.7% | 30.9% | 22.8% | 4.6% |
| Jul 2026 | 41.1% | 32% | 22.5% | 4.5% |
| Aug 2026 | 42% | 35.5% | 18.7% | 3.8% |
| Sep 2026 | 40.9% | 32.2% | 22.4% | 4.5% |
How has the OANDA and Wise comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- OANDA was ahead of Wise in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OANDA’s share of searches among currency converter software worldwide moved from 46% to 40.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 550K to 450K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Wise’s share of searches among currency converter software worldwide moved from 29.3% to 32.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 351K to 354K.
How did search popularity change for currency converter software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Wise lost share of searches among currency converter software worldwide, from 35.5% to 32.2%.
In September 2026, OANDA lost share of searches among currency converter software worldwide, from 42% to 40.9%.
How are branded searches counted?
15 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using OANDA’s and Wise’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among currency converter software
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.