Microsoft Purview vs OpenText:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Microsoft Purview had more branded searches than OpenText among records management software worldwide. Microsoft Purview had about 60,500 branded searches, while OpenText had 140. Microsoft Purview made up 18.2% of all records management software searches we track, and OpenText accounted for 0.04%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about records management software, Microsoft Purview appeared in three of the five answers and OpenText in two. Microsoft Purview was mentioned before OpenText in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Microsoft Purview, about 432 searches for every 1 for OpenText
Who does AI mention more?
Microsoft Purview, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, OpenText in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Microsoft Purview, named ahead of OpenText in 2 of 2 answers
Follow Microsoft Purview vs OpenText and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top records management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Purview was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. OpenText was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Microsoft Purview was listed before OpenText in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
M-Files1st
Microsoft Purview2nd
Laserfiche3rd
DocuWare4th
OpenText5th
Access6th
Iron Mountain–
Collabspace–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Access4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Microsoft Purview3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
M-Files3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
DocuWare2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Laserfiche2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
OpenText2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Iron Mountain0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Collabspace0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about records management software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which records management software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best records management software options?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best records management software for organised business records?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“records management software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“records management system”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Microsoft Purview or OpenText more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Microsoft Purview and OpenText by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight records management software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Microsoft Purview, OpenText. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Iron Mountain | Microsoft Purview | DocuWare | Laserfiche | M-Files | Collabspace | Access | OpenText |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 60.2% | 14.8% | 12.2% | 6.7% | 5.4% | 0.39% | 0.19% | 0.1% |
| Nov 2025 | 74.1% | 10% | 8.2% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 0.26% | 0.11% | 0.04% |
| Dec 2025 | 60.4% | 14.8% | 12.2% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.06% |
| Jan 2026 | 60.3% | 14.9% | 12.2% | 6.7% | 5.4% | 0.22% | 0.22% | 0.08% |
| Feb 2026 | 61.1% | 15.1% | 12.4% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 0.18% | 0.2% | 0.08% |
| Mar 2026 | 58.4% | 17.6% | 11.8% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.08% |
| Apr 2026 | 58.4% | 17.6% | 11.8% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.08% |
| May 2026 | 63.2% | 15.6% | 10.4% | 5.7% | 4.7% | 0.19% | 0.2% | 0.05% |
| Jun 2026 | 61.1% | 18.4% | 10.1% | 5.5% | 4.5% | 0.22% | 0.18% | 0.06% |
| Jul 2026 | 63.2% | 15.6% | 10.4% | 5.7% | 4.7% | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.07% |
| Aug 2026 | 62.9% | 15.5% | 10.4% | 7% | 3.8% | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.05% |
| Sep 2026 | 60.3% | 18.2% | 10% | 6.7% | 4.5% | 0.22% | 0.18% | 0.04% |
How has the Microsoft Purview and OpenText comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Microsoft Purview was ahead of OpenText in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Microsoft Purview’s share of searches among records management software worldwide moved from 14.8% to 18.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 49.5K to 60.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OpenText’s share of searches among records management software worldwide moved from 0.1% to 0.04%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 320 to 140.
How did search popularity change for records management software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Microsoft Purview gained share of searches among records management software worldwide, from 15.5% to 18.2%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for OpenText worldwide fell 56.3% over 12 measured months, from 320 to 140 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Microsoft Purview’s and OpenText’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Microsoft Purview
1 branded search term
- microsoft purview
OpenText
1 branded search term
- document management opentext
Other head-to-heads among records management software

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.