How popular isJuro?
In September 2026, people searched for Juro by name about 270 times worldwide, a 42.6% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 0.19% of all global legal document automation software searches, placing Juro tenth out of 11 brands. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about legal document automation software, Juro appeared in three of the five answers and was the seventh most recommended of the 11.
Juro is the tenth most searched of 11 competitors and the seventh most recommended in AI answers.
SpellbookShare of searches 37.7%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
HotDocsShare of searches 30.8%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
DocumateShare of searches 11.2%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 8th
Clio DraftShare of searches 9.2%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
JuroShare of searches 0.19%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 7th
Follow Juro and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top legal document automation software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Juro was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Juro is the seventh most recommended of the 11.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Gavel1st
Clio Draft2nd
HotDocs3rd
Spellbook4th
Ironclad5th
Contract Express6th
Juro7th
Documate8th
Lawyaw9th
Docassemble–- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
HotDocs4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Gavel4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Spellbook3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Clio Draft3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Ironclad3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Juro3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Contract Express2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Documate1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Lawyaw1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Docassemble0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about legal document automation software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which legal document automation software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best legal document automation software options?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best legal document automation software for contract drafting?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“legal document automation software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“contract automation software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which legal document automation software compete with Juro?
Share of searches by month for Spellbook, HotDocs, Documate, Clio Draft, Contract Express, Ironclad, Juro. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Spellbook | HotDocs | Documate | Clio Draft | Contract Express | Ironclad | Gavel | Docassemble | Lawyaw | Juro | Afterpattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 39.3% | 32% | 4.2% | 11.7% | 4.2% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 0.25% | 0.57% |
| Nov 2025 | 37% | 37% | 3.3% | 11% | 3.9% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 2% | 0.23% | 0.35% |
| Dec 2025 | 35.1% | 35.1% | 3.1% | 10.5% | 3.7% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 7% | 1.9% | 0.21% | 0.27% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.6% | 32.3% | 3.4% | 11.8% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 2.9% | 2.3% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Feb 2026 | 39.8% | 32.5% | 3.4% | 9.7% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 1.8% | 4.3% | 1.8% | 0.16% | 0.25% |
| Mar 2026 | 39.4% | 32.3% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 0.31% | 0.31% |
| Apr 2026 | 33.8% | 41.3% | 6.7% | 8.2% | 2.9% | 2% | 1.4% | 2% | 1.3% | 0.26% | 0.17% |
| May 2026 | 36.6% | 36.6% | 7.2% | 8.9% | 3.1% | 2.6% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 0.23% | 0.18% |
| Jun 2026 | 35% | 35% | 5.6% | 10.5% | 4.6% | 3.7% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 0.33% | 0.17% |
| Jul 2026 | 38% | 31.1% | 6.1% | 11.3% | 4% | 4% | 1.3% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.29% | 0.23% |
| Aug 2026 | 33.6% | 33.6% | 10% | 10% | 4.5% | 3.5% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.2% | 0.17% |
| Sep 2026 | 37.7% | 30.8% | 11.2% | 9.2% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.19% | 0.12% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, moved from 2nd to 1st | 37.7% | 22.2K | +22.7% | +4.1 pointsmoved from 2nd to 1st | |
| 2, moved from 1st to 2nd | 30.8% | 18.1K | 0% | -2.8 pointsmoved from 1st to 2nd | |
| 3, moved from 4th to 3rd | 11.2% | 6.6K | +22.2% | +1.2 pointsmoved from 4th to 3rd | |
| 4, moved from 3rd to 4th | 9.2% | 5.4K | 0% | -0.8 pointsmoved from 3rd to 4th | |
| 5, held 5th | 4.1% | 2.4K | 0% | -0.4 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 2.7% | 1.6K | -15.8% | -0.8 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 1.5% | 890 | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 1.2% | 720 | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 1.2% | 720 | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.19% | 110 | 0% | 0 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 0.12% | 70 | -22.2% | 0 points |
37.7%
Moved from 2nd to 1st. 22.2K estimated branded searches, +22.7% vs prior month. Share +4.1 points.
2.
HotDocs30.8%
Moved from 1st to 2nd. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -2.8 points.
3.
Documate11.2%
Moved from 4th to 3rd. 6.6K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +1.2 points.
9.2%
Moved from 3rd to 4th. 5.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.8 points.
4.1%
Held 5th. 2.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.4 points.
6.
Ironclad2.7%
Held 6th. 1.6K estimated branded searches, -15.8% vs prior month. Share -0.8 points.
7.
Gavel1.5%
Held 7th. 890 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
1.2%
Held 8th. 720 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
9.
Lawyaw1.2%
Held 9th. 720 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
10.
Juro0.19%
Held 10th. 110 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
11.
Afterpattern0.12%
Held 11th. 70 estimated branded searches, -22.2% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Juro and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Juro
23 comparisons
- Agiloft vs Juro
- Conga vs Juro
- ContractWorks vs Juro
- Icertis vs Juro
- Juro vs LinkSquares
- Juro vs Sirion
- Juro vs SpotDraft
- Harvey vs Juro
- Ironclad vs Juro
- Juro vs Kira
- Juro vs LawGeex
- Juro vs LegalOn
- Juro vs Luminance
- Juro vs Spellbook
- Clio Draft vs Juro
- Contract Express vs Juro
- Docassemble vs Juro
- Documate vs Juro
- Gavel vs Juro
- HotDocs vs Juro
- Juro vs Lawyaw
- Juro vs LexCheck
- Afterpattern vs Juro
How has branded search demand for Juro changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Juro worldwide fell from 470 to 270.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Juro rose from 11th to 10th among legal document automation software worldwide.
How did search popularity change for legal document automation software worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Spellbook overtook HotDocs to become the leader among legal document automation software worldwide, with 37.7% of the searches.

In September 2026, Documate overtook Clio Draft to rank 3rd among legal document automation software worldwide, with 11.2% of the searches.

In September 2026, HotDocs lost share of searches among legal document automation software worldwide, from 33.6% to 30.8%.

In September 2026, Clio Draft lost share of searches among legal document automation software worldwide, from 10% to 9.2%.

In September 2026, Ironclad lost share of searches among legal document automation software worldwide, from 3.5% to 2.7%.

Docassemble’s share of searches among legal document automation software worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 1.9% to 1.2% in September 2026.
How are Juro’s branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Juro’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- juro clm
- juro com
- juro contract management
Do you work for Juro? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does Juro compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contract review platforms | 8th of 10 | 0.1% | Show ranking |
| Contract lifecycle management software | 9th of 9 | 0.43% | Show ranking |
| Legal document automation software | 10th of 11 | 0.19% | Shown above |

Is Juro your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.