Docassemble vs Juro:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Docassemble had more branded searches than Juro among legal document automation software worldwide. Docassemble had about 720 branded searches, while Juro had 110. Docassemble made up 1.2% of all legal document automation software searches we track, and Juro accounted for 0.19%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about legal document automation software, Juro appeared in three of the five answers and Docassemble in none.
Who do people search for more?
Docassemble, about 7 searches for every 1 for Juro
Who does AI mention more?
Juro, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Docassemble in 0
Who does AI recommend more?
Juro, the only one of the two named
Follow Docassemble vs Juro and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top legal document automation software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Juro was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Docassemble did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Gavel1st
Clio Draft2nd
HotDocs3rd
Spellbook4th
Ironclad5th
Contract Express6th
Juro7th
Documate8th
Lawyaw9th
Docassemble–- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
HotDocs4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Gavel4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Spellbook3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Clio Draft3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Ironclad3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Juro3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Contract Express2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Documate1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Lawyaw1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Docassemble0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about legal document automation software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which legal document automation software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best legal document automation software options?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best legal document automation software for contract drafting?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“legal document automation software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“contract automation software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Docassemble or Juro more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Docassemble and Juro by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 legal document automation software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Docassemble, Juro. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Spellbook | HotDocs | Documate | Clio Draft | Contract Express | Ironclad | Gavel | Docassemble | Lawyaw | Juro | Afterpattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 39.3% | 32% | 4.2% | 11.7% | 4.2% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 0.25% | 0.57% |
| Nov 2025 | 37% | 37% | 3.3% | 11% | 3.9% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 2% | 0.23% | 0.35% |
| Dec 2025 | 35.1% | 35.1% | 3.1% | 10.5% | 3.7% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 7% | 1.9% | 0.21% | 0.27% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.6% | 32.3% | 3.4% | 11.8% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 2.9% | 2.3% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Feb 2026 | 39.8% | 32.5% | 3.4% | 9.7% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 1.8% | 4.3% | 1.8% | 0.16% | 0.25% |
| Mar 2026 | 39.4% | 32.3% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 0.31% | 0.31% |
| Apr 2026 | 33.8% | 41.3% | 6.7% | 8.2% | 2.9% | 2% | 1.4% | 2% | 1.3% | 0.26% | 0.17% |
| May 2026 | 36.6% | 36.6% | 7.2% | 8.9% | 3.1% | 2.6% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 0.23% | 0.18% |
| Jun 2026 | 35% | 35% | 5.6% | 10.5% | 4.6% | 3.7% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 0.33% | 0.17% |
| Jul 2026 | 38% | 31.1% | 6.1% | 11.3% | 4% | 4% | 1.3% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.29% | 0.23% |
| Aug 2026 | 33.6% | 33.6% | 10% | 10% | 4.5% | 3.5% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.2% | 0.17% |
| Sep 2026 | 37.7% | 30.8% | 11.2% | 9.2% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.19% | 0.12% |
How has the Docassemble and Juro comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Docassemble was ahead of Juro in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Docassemble’s share of searches among legal document automation software worldwide moved from 1.6% to 1.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 880 to 720.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Juro’s share of searches among legal document automation software worldwide moved from 0.25% to 0.19%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 140 to 110.
How did search popularity change for legal document automation software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

Docassemble’s share of searches among legal document automation software worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 1.9% to 1.2% in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Juro worldwide fell 21.4% over 12 measured months, from 140 to 110 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Docassemble’s and Juro’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Docassemble
1 branded search term
- docassemble
Juro
1 branded search term
- juro clm
Other head-to-heads among legal document automation software

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.