How popular isDynaMed?
In September 2026, people searched for DynaMed by name about 22,200 times worldwide, a 32.9% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 0.63% of all global clinical decision support platform searches, placing DynaMed sixth out of eight platforms. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about clinical decision support platforms, DynaMed appeared in three of the five answers and was the second most recommended of the eight.
DynaMed is the sixth most searched of 8 competitors and the second most recommended in AI answers.
OpenEvidenceShare of searches 51.5%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
UpToDateShare of searches 28.2%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
ElsevierShare of searches 10.4%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
IsabelShare of searches 4.6%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
DynaMedShare of searches 0.63%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
Follow DynaMed and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top clinical decision support platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, DynaMed was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. DynaMed is the second most recommended of the eight.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
- UpToDate1st
- DynaMed2nd
VisualDx3rd- OpenEvidence4th
BMJ Best Practice5th
Wolters Kluwer6th- Elsevier–
- Isabel–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- UpToDate4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Wolters Kluwer3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- DynaMed3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- OpenEvidence2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- VisualDx2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Elsevier1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- BMJ Best Practice1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Isabel0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about clinical decision support platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which clinical decision support platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best clinical decision support platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best clinical decision support platform for evidence based care?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“clinical decision support software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“clinical decision support platforms”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Which clinical decision support platforms compete with DynaMed?
Share of searches by month for OpenEvidence, UpToDate, Elsevier, Isabel, Wolters Kluwer, DynaMed. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | OpenEvidence | UpToDate | Elsevier | Isabel | Wolters Kluwer | DynaMed | BMJ Best Practice | VisualDx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 38.8% | 38.8% | 11.7% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 1.1% | 0.58% | 0.39% |
| Nov 2025 | 34% | 41.5% | 12.5% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 0.92% | 0.5% | 0.41% |
| Dec 2025 | 37.8% | 37.8% | 11.4% | 6.2% | 5.1% | 0.84% | 0.56% | 0.37% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.1% | 39.1% | 9.6% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 0.32% |
| Feb 2026 | 42% | 34.4% | 10.4% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.34% |
| Mar 2026 | 43.3% | 35.3% | 10.6% | 3.9% | 4.8% | 0.78% | 0.96% | 0.35% |
| Apr 2026 | 48.8% | 32.5% | 9.8% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 0.72% | 0.59% | 0.32% |
| May 2026 | 47.6% | 31.7% | 9.6% | 5.2% | 4.3% | 0.7% | 0.57% | 0.31% |
| Jun 2026 | 49.1% | 32.7% | 8% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 0.59% | 0.4% | 0.32% |
| Jul 2026 | 53.5% | 29.3% | 7.2% | 4.8% | 3.9% | 0.53% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Aug 2026 | 52.6% | 28.8% | 8.7% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Sep 2026 | 51.5% | 28.2% | 10.4% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 0.63% | 0.51% | 0.34% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 51.5% | 1.8M | 0% | -1.1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 28.2% | 1M | 0% | -0.6 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 10.4% | 368K | +22.3% | +1.7 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 4.6% | 165K | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 3.8% | 135K | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 0.63% | 22.2K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 0.51% | 18.1K | +49.6% | +0.2 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 0.34% | 12.1K | 0% | 0 points |
51.5%
Held 1st. 1.8M estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -1.1 points.
2.
UpToDate28.2%
Held 2nd. 1M estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.6 points.
3.
Elsevier10.4%
Held 3rd. 368K estimated branded searches, +22.3% vs prior month. Share +1.7 points.
4.
Isabel4.6%
Held 4th. 165K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
3.8%
Held 5th. 135K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
6.
DynaMed0.63%
Held 6th. 22.2K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
0.51%
Held 7th. 18.1K estimated branded searches, +49.6% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
8.
VisualDx0.34%
Held 8th. 12.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between DynaMed and its closest rivals
Every comparison with DynaMed
7 comparisons
How has branded search demand for DynaMed changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for DynaMed worldwide fell from 33.1K to 22.2K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, DynaMed’s share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide held steady, from 1.1% to 0.63%.
How did search popularity change for clinical decision support platforms worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes
In September 2026, Elsevier gained share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide, from 8.7% to 10.4%.
In September 2026, OpenEvidence lost share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide, from 52.6% to 51.5%.
In September 2026, UpToDate lost share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide, from 28.8% to 28.2%.
Wolters Kluwer’s share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 4.4% to 3.8% in September 2026.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Isabel worldwide rose 22.2% over 12 measured months, from 135K to 165K in September 2026.
Estimated monthly branded searches for DynaMed worldwide fell 32.9% over 12 measured months, from 33.1K to 22.2K in September 2026.
How are DynaMed’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using DynaMed’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- dynamed
Who owns DynaMed?
DynaMed is owned by EBSCO. Brandwave does not track any other brands owned by EBSCO.
Do you work for DynaMed? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Is DynaMed your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.