DynaMed vs Wolters Kluwer:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Wolters Kluwer had more branded searches than DynaMed among clinical decision support platforms worldwide. Wolters Kluwer had about 135,000 branded searches, while DynaMed had 22,200. Wolters Kluwer made up 3.8% of all clinical decision support platform searches we track, and DynaMed accounted for 0.63%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about clinical decision support platforms, DynaMed and Wolters Kluwer each appeared in three of the five answers. DynaMed was mentioned before Wolters Kluwer in every answer.
Who do people search for more?
Wolters Kluwer, about 6 searches for every 1 for DynaMed
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 3 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
DynaMed, named ahead of Wolters Kluwer in every answer
Follow DynaMed vs Wolters Kluwer and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top clinical decision support platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, DynaMed was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Wolters Kluwer was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. DynaMed was listed before Wolters Kluwer in every answer.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
UpToDate1st
DynaMed2nd
VisualDx3rd
OpenEvidence4th
BMJ Best Practice5th
Wolters Kluwer6th
Elsevier–
Isabel–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
UpToDate4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Wolters Kluwer3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
DynaMed3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
OpenEvidence2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
VisualDx2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Elsevier1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
BMJ Best Practice1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Isabel0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about clinical decision support platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which clinical decision support platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best clinical decision support platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best clinical decision support platform for evidence based care?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“clinical decision support software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“clinical decision support platforms”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is DynaMed or Wolters Kluwer more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for DynaMed and Wolters Kluwer by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight clinical decision support platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Wolters Kluwer, DynaMed. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | OpenEvidence | UpToDate | Elsevier | Isabel | Wolters Kluwer | DynaMed | BMJ Best Practice | VisualDx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 38.8% | 38.8% | 11.7% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 1.1% | 0.58% | 0.39% |
| Nov 2025 | 34% | 41.5% | 12.5% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 0.92% | 0.5% | 0.41% |
| Dec 2025 | 37.8% | 37.8% | 11.4% | 6.2% | 5.1% | 0.84% | 0.56% | 0.37% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.1% | 39.1% | 9.6% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 0.32% |
| Feb 2026 | 42% | 34.4% | 10.4% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.34% |
| Mar 2026 | 43.3% | 35.3% | 10.6% | 3.9% | 4.8% | 0.78% | 0.96% | 0.35% |
| Apr 2026 | 48.8% | 32.5% | 9.8% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 0.72% | 0.59% | 0.32% |
| May 2026 | 47.6% | 31.7% | 9.6% | 5.2% | 4.3% | 0.7% | 0.57% | 0.31% |
| Jun 2026 | 49.1% | 32.7% | 8% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 0.59% | 0.4% | 0.32% |
| Jul 2026 | 53.5% | 29.3% | 7.2% | 4.8% | 3.9% | 0.53% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Aug 2026 | 52.6% | 28.8% | 8.7% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Sep 2026 | 51.5% | 28.2% | 10.4% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 0.63% | 0.51% | 0.34% |
How has the DynaMed and Wolters Kluwer comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Wolters Kluwer was ahead of DynaMed in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, DynaMed’s share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide moved from 1.1% to 0.63%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 33.1K to 22.2K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Wolters Kluwer’s share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide moved from 4.3% to 3.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 135K.
How did search popularity change for clinical decision support platforms worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

Wolters Kluwer’s share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 4.4% to 3.8% in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for DynaMed worldwide fell 32.9% over 12 measured months, from 33.1K to 22.2K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using DynaMed’s and Wolters Kluwer’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
DynaMed
1 branded search term
- dynamed
Wolters Kluwer
1 branded search term
- wolters kluwer
Other head-to-heads among clinical decision support platforms

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.