IKEA vs King Living:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, IKEA had more branded searches than King Living among furniture retailers in Australia. IKEA had about 1.2 million branded searches, while King Living had 33,100. IKEA made up 46.6% of all furniture retailer searches we track, and King Living accounted for 1.3%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about furniture retailers, IKEA appeared in three of the five answers and King Living in two. IKEA was mentioned before King Living in two out of three answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
IKEA, about 37 searches for every 1 for King Living
Who does AI mention more?
IKEA, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, King Living in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
IKEA, named ahead of King Living in 2 of 3 answers
Follow IKEA vs King Living and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top furniture retailers in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, IKEA was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. King Living was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. IKEA was listed before King Living in two out of three answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Temple & Webster1st
IKEA2nd
King Living3rd
Amart Furniture4th
Castlery5th
Mocka6th
Koala7th
Fantastic Furniture8th
Nick Scali9th
Brosa–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Amart Furniture4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
IKEA3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Temple & Webster3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Fantastic Furniture2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
King Living2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Mocka2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Castlery2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Koala2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Nick Scali1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Brosa0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about furniture retailers
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which furniture store should I buy a sofa from in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best furniture retailers in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best online furniture store in Australia for good quality at a fair price?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“online furniture stores”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“furniture”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 22, 2026.
Is IKEA or King Living more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for IKEA and King Living by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten furniture retailers we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.
Share of searches by month for IKEA, King Living. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | IKEA | Fantastic Furniture | Temple & Webster | Amart Furniture | Nick Scali | King Living | Mocka | Castlery | Koala | Brosa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 46.9% | 21% | 14.1% | 10.5% | 3.4% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.09% |
| Nov 2025 | 47.1% | 17.3% | 17.3% | 10.6% | 3.5% | 1.3% | 1% | 1% | 0.72% | 0.09% |
| Dec 2025 | 51.9% | 19.1% | 12.8% | 10.4% | 2.6% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.07% |
| Jan 2026 | 56.1% | 16.9% | 11.3% | 9.2% | 3.4% | 1% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.51% | 0.07% |
| Feb 2026 | 52.9% | 19.4% | 13% | 8.6% | 2.6% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 0.58% | 0.07% |
| Mar 2026 | 51.7% | 19% | 12.7% | 9.5% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.93% | 0.7% | 0.08% |
| Apr 2026 | 56.6% | 17% | 11.4% | 8.5% | 2.8% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.84% | 0.56% | 0.06% |
| May 2026 | 51.6% | 18.9% | 12.7% | 9.5% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.93% | 0.62% | 0.08% |
| Jun 2026 | 46.4% | 20.8% | 13.9% | 10.4% | 4.2% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
| Jul 2026 | 50.9% | 18.7% | 12.5% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.92% | 0.56% | 0.06% |
| Aug 2026 | 51.2% | 18.8% | 12.6% | 9.4% | 3.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.92% | 0.61% | 0.06% |
| Sep 2026 | 46.6% | 21% | 14% | 10.5% | 3.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.84% | 0.07% |
How has the IKEA and King Living comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- IKEA was ahead of King Living in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, IKEA’s share of searches among furniture retailers in Australia moved from 46.9% to 46.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1.5M to 1.2M.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, King Living’s share of searches among furniture retailers in Australia held steady at 1.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 40.5K to 33.1K.
How did search popularity change for Australia furniture retailers in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, IKEA lost share of searches among furniture retailers in Australia, from 51.2% to 46.6%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for King Living in Australia fell 18.3% over 12 measured months, from 40.5K to 33.1K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using IKEA’s and King Living’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
IKEA
1 branded search term
- ikea
King Living
1 branded search term
- king living
Other head-to-heads among furniture retailers

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.