How popular isNanoleaf?
In September 2026, people searched for Nanoleaf by name about 3,600 times in Australia, a 24.1% increase from the previous year. These searches made up 7.9% of all Australia smart lighting brand searches, placing Nanoleaf fourth out of seven brands. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about smart lighting brands, Nanoleaf appeared in two of the five answers and was the fifth most recommended of the seven.
Nanoleaf is the fourth most searched of 7 competitors and the fifth most recommended in AI answers.
GoveeShare of searches 59.7%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 6th
Philips HueShare of searches 17.9%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
MirabellaShare of searches 7.9%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
NanoleafShare of searches 7.9%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th
LIFXShare of searches 3.5%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
Follow Nanoleaf and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top smart lighting brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Nanoleaf was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Nanoleaf is the fifth most recommended of the seven.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
TP-Link Tapo1st
Philips Hue2nd
WiZ3rd
LIFX4th
Nanoleaf5th
Govee6th
Mirabella–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Philips Hue5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
TP-Link Tapo5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
WiZ3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Nanoleaf2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
LIFX2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Govee1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Mirabella0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about smart lighting brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which smart bulbs should I buy in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best smart lighting brands in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best smart lights for a home without a hub?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“smart lights”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“smart bulbs”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.
Which smart lighting brands compete with Nanoleaf?
Share of searches by month for Govee, Philips Hue, Mirabella, Nanoleaf, LIFX. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Govee | Philips Hue | Mirabella | Nanoleaf | LIFX | WiZ | TP-Link Tapo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 57% | 20.8% | 9.3% | 6.1% | 5% | 1.2% | 0.55% |
| Nov 2025 | 52.2% | 23.3% | 8.5% | 8.5% | 5.6% | 1.4% | 0.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 48% | 21.4% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 5.2% | 1.6% | 0.56% |
| Jan 2026 | 52.3% | 19.1% | 10.4% | 10.4% | 5.7% | 1.7% | 0.49% |
| Feb 2026 | 59.1% | 17.6% | 9.6% | 7.7% | 4.3% | 1.3% | 0.45% |
| Mar 2026 | 60.8% | 14.8% | 9.9% | 8.1% | 4.3% | 1.6% | 0.58% |
| Apr 2026 | 58.2% | 17.4% | 9.4% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 1.5% | 0.56% |
| May 2026 | 55.7% | 20.3% | 9% | 7.4% | 4.9% | 1.8% | 0.8% |
| Jun 2026 | 55.6% | 20.3% | 9% | 7.4% | 4.9% | 1.8% | 0.98% |
| Jul 2026 | 59.5% | 17.8% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Aug 2026 | 64.8% | 15.9% | 7% | 7% | 3% | 1.4% | 0.77% |
| Sep 2026 | 59.7% | 17.9% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 3.5% | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 59.7% | 27.1K | -33.1% | -5.1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 17.9% | 8.1K | -18.2% | +2 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 7.9% | 3.6K | -18.2% | +0.9 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 7.9% | 3.6K | -18.2% | +0.9 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 3.5% | 1.6K | -15.8% | +0.5 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 1.9% | 880 | 0% | +0.5 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 1.1% | 480 | 0% | +0.3 points |
1.
Govee59.7%
Held 1st. 27.1K estimated branded searches, -33.1% vs prior month. Share -5.1 points.
17.9%
Held 2nd. 8.1K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share +2 points.
7.9%
Held 3rd. 3.6K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
4.
Nanoleaf7.9%
Held 4th. 3.6K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
5.
LIFX3.5%
Held 5th. 1.6K estimated branded searches, -15.8% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
6.
WiZ1.9%
Held 6th. 880 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
1.1%
Held 7th. 480 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
Compare popularity between Nanoleaf and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Nanoleaf
6 comparisons
How has branded search demand for Nanoleaf changed in Australia over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Nanoleaf in Australia rose from 2.9K to 3.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Nanoleaf’s share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia increased from 6.1% to 7.9%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Nanoleaf’s share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia peaked at 11.7% in December 2025 and was lowest at 6.1% in October 2025.
How did search popularity change for Australia smart lighting brands in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Philips Hue gained share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia, from 15.9% to 17.9%.

In September 2026, Mirabella gained share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia, from 7% to 7.9%.

In September 2026, Nanoleaf gained share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia, from 7% to 7.9%.

In September 2026, WiZ gained share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia, from 1.4% to 1.9%.

In September 2026, Govee lost share of searches among smart lighting brands in Australia, from 64.8% to 59.7%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for TP-Link Tapo in Australia rose 84.6% over 12 measured months, from 260 to 480 in September 2026.
How are Nanoleaf’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Nanoleaf’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- nanoleaf
Do you work for Nanoleaf? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Nanoleaf your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.