Habitat vs Pooky:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Pooky had more branded searches than Habitat among lighting retailers in the United Kingdom. Pooky had about 18,100 branded searches, while Habitat had 1,600. Pooky made up 20.1% of all lighting retailer searches we track, and Habitat accounted for 1.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about lighting retailers, Habitat and Pooky each appeared in two of the five answers. Habitat and Pooky were each mentioned first in two of the four answers.
Who do people search for more?
Pooky, about 11 searches for every 1 for Habitat
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 2 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
Each is named first in 2 of 4 answers.
Follow Habitat vs Pooky and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top lighting retailers in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Habitat was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Pooky was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Habitat and Pooky were each listed first in two of the four answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Dunelm1st
John Lewis2nd- Pooky3rd
Habitat4th
Lights.co.uk5th
Jim Lawrence6th
Litecraft7th
Lights4fun–
Dowsing & Reynolds–
Pagazzi–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Dunelm3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Pooky2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- John Lewis2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Habitat2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Jim Lawrence1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Lights.co.uk1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Litecraft1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Lights4fun0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Dowsing & Reynolds0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Pagazzi0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about lighting retailers
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Where's the best place to buy ceiling lights in the UK?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which UK shops sell stylish lamps that aren't too expensive?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are good UK lighting shops for a kitchen renovation?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“ceiling lights”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“table lamps”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United Kingdom on October 28, 2026.
Is Habitat or Pooky more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Habitat and Pooky by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten lighting retailers we track, month by month, from searches in United Kingdom.
Share of searches by month for Pooky, Habitat. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Dunelm | Pooky | Lights4fun | John Lewis | Jim Lawrence | Dowsing & Reynolds | Lights.co.uk | Litecraft | Pagazzi | Habitat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 21.7% | 21.7% | 14.5% | 14.5% | 9.7% | 6.5% | 2.3% | 2.9% | 4.3% | 1.9% |
| Nov 2025 | 16.3% | 19.9% | 29.8% | 10.9% | 7.3% | 6% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 4% | 1.4% |
| Dec 2025 | 15% | 18.4% | 33.6% | 10% | 8.2% | 5.5% | 2% | 2.4% | 3.6% | 1.3% |
| Jan 2026 | 23.2% | 23.2% | 10.4% | 12.7% | 10.4% | 6.9% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 5.7% | 2.1% |
| Feb 2026 | 24.9% | 20.3% | 7.4% | 13.6% | 11.1% | 7.4% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 7.4% | 1.8% |
| Mar 2026 | 19.9% | 24.4% | 8.9% | 13.3% | 10.9% | 8.9% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 5.9% | 1.8% |
| Apr 2026 | 18.9% | 23.1% | 12.7% | 12.7% | 12.7% | 8.4% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 1.7% |
| May 2026 | 19.4% | 23.7% | 13% | 10.6% | 13% | 8.6% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 1.7% |
| Jun 2026 | 20.8% | 25.5% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 9.3% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 3.4% | 1.4% |
| Jul 2026 | 19.2% | 28.7% | 12.8% | 10.5% | 10.5% | 8.5% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 1.1% |
| Aug 2026 | 20% | 24.6% | 13.4% | 11% | 11% | 9% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 1.4% |
| Sep 2026 | 20.1% | 20.1% | 16.5% | 13.5% | 11% | 7.3% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 1.8% |
Habitat sells other things too, so only its searches that name this product count here, like “habitat lighting”.
How has the Habitat and Pooky comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Pooky was ahead of Habitat in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Habitat’s share of searches among lighting retailers in the United Kingdom moved from 1.9% to 1.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 2.4K to 1.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Pooky’s share of searches among lighting retailers in the United Kingdom moved from 21.7% to 20.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 27.1K to 18.1K.
How did search popularity change for United Kingdom lighting retailers in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Pooky lost share of searches among lighting retailers in the United Kingdom, from 24.6% to 20.1%.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Habitat in the United Kingdom fell 33.3% over 12 measured months, from 2.4K to 1.6K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Habitat’s and Pooky’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among lighting retailers
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.