Fab vs Textures.com:Which is more popular in New Zealand?
In October 2026, Fab had more branded searches than Textures.com among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand. Fab had about 50 branded searches, while Textures.com had 40. Fab made up 4.1% of all 3D texture and asset library searches we track, and Textures.com accounted for 3.3%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about 3D texture and asset libraries, Fab appeared in three of the four answers and Textures.com in two. Fab was mentioned before Textures.com in three out of four answers.
Who do people search for more?
Fab, about 25% more searches than Textures.com
Who does AI mention more?
Fab, mentioned in 3 of 4 answers, Textures.com in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Fab, named ahead of Textures.com in 3 of 4 answers
Follow Fab vs Textures.com and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top 3D texture and asset libraries in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, Fab was mentioned in three out of four: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. Textures.com was mentioned in two out of four: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in the Google AI Overview. Fab was listed before Textures.com in three out of four answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Poly Haven1st- Fab2nd
ambientCG3rd
Quixel Megascans4th
Synty Studios5th
Poliigon6th
Textures.com7th
CGAxis–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Poly Haven4 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- Quixel Megascans4 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- ambientCG3 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- Fab3 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
- Poliigon2 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- Synty Studios2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
- Textures.com2 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
- CGAxis0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
See every answer about 3D texture and asset libraries
4 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which 3D texture and asset library should I use in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best 3D texture and asset library in New Zealand for game art assets?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“3d texture library”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“pbr texture library”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 20, 2026.
Is Fab or Textures.com more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Fab and Textures.com by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight 3D texture and asset libraries we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for Fab, Textures.com. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Poly Haven | Poliigon | ambientCG | Synty Studios | Fab | Textures.com | Quixel Megascans | CGAxis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2025 | 45.5% | 22.1% | 6.5% | 14.3% | 3.9% | 2.6% | 3.9% | 1.3% |
| Dec 2025 | 44.2% | 21.2% | 5.8% | 11.5% | 5.8% | 1.9% | 7.7% | 1.9% |
| Jan 2026 | 43.8% | 21.9% | 4.7% | 12.5% | 6.3% | 3.1% | 6.3% | 1.6% |
| Feb 2026 | 58.1% | 12.2% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 2.7% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 1.4% |
| Mar 2026 | 58.6% | 12.6% | 8.1% | 10.8% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 0.9% |
| Apr 2026 | 53.4% | 12.5% | 8% | 14.8% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 4.5% | 1.1% |
| May 2026 | 58.7% | 17.4% | 7.4% | 8.3% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 0.83% |
| Jun 2026 | 57.1% | 15.2% | 8% | 11.6% | 3.6% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.89% |
| Jul 2026 | 59.1% | 10% | 8.2% | 12.7% | 4.5% | 1.8% | 2.7% | 0.91% |
| Aug 2026 | 57.7% | 12.6% | 9.9% | 9% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 3.6% | 0.9% |
| Sep 2026 | 55.8% | 10.6% | 13.5% | 11.5% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 1.9% | 0.96% |
| Oct 2026 | 52.9% | 14% | 11.6% | 10.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 2.5% | 0.83% |
How has branded search for Fab and Textures.com changed in New Zealand over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- The lead changed hands 2 times in the 12 months ending October 2026: Textures.com took it in February 2026, Fab took it in March 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending October 2026, Fab’s share of searches among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand moved from 3.9% to 4.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 30 to 50.
- Across the 12 months ending October 2026, Textures.com’s share of searches among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand moved from 2.6% to 3.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 20 to 40.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand 3D texture and asset libraries in October 2026?
2 changes
In October 2026, Fab gained share of searches among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand, from 2.9% to 4.1%.
Textures.com’s share of searches among 3D texture and asset libraries in New Zealand has gained ground for 3 months in a row, from 1.8% to 3.3% in October 2026.
How are Fab’s and Textures.com’s branded searches counted?
5 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Fab’s and Textures.com’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Fab
3 branded search terms
- fab epic
- fab marketplace
- fab.com
Textures.com
2 branded search terms
- textures.com
- texturescom
Other head-to-heads among 3D texture and asset libraries
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.