HazardCo vs SiteApp Pro:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, HazardCo had more branded searches than SiteApp Pro among health and safety software in New Zealand. HazardCo had about 1,990 branded searches, while SiteApp Pro had 1,260. HazardCo made up 26.5% of all health and safety software searches we track, and SiteApp Pro accounted for 16.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about health and safety software, HazardCo appeared in four of the five answers and SiteApp Pro in one. HazardCo was mentioned before SiteApp Pro in three out of four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
HazardCo, about 58% more searches than SiteApp Pro
Who does AI mention more?
HazardCo, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, SiteApp Pro in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
HazardCo, named ahead of SiteApp Pro in 3 of 4 answers
Follow HazardCo vs SiteApp Pro and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top health and safety software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, HazardCo was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. SiteApp Pro was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. HazardCo was listed before SiteApp Pro in three out of four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
ThinkSafe1st
SafetyCulture2nd
HazardCo3rd
ecoPortal4th
SiteConnect4th
SiteApp Pro6th
Mango7th- Vault8th
Donesafe9th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
SafetyCulture5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
HazardCo4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
ThinkSafe4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
ecoPortal2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
SiteConnect2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
SiteApp Pro1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Donesafe1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Mango1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Vault1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about health and safety software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which health and safety software should I use in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best health and safety software tools in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best health and safety software in New Zealand for a small business?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“health and safety software nz”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“hazard reporting software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 21, 2026.
Is HazardCo or SiteApp Pro more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for HazardCo and SiteApp Pro by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine health and safety software we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for HazardCo, SiteApp Pro. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | SafetyCulture | HazardCo | SiteApp Pro | ecoPortal | Donesafe | SiteConnect | ThinkSafe | Mango | Vault |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 34.4% | 25.8% | 14% | 11% | 8% | 4.9% | 1.4% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
| Nov 2025 | 33.8% | 25.3% | 13.4% | 12.5% | 8.3% | 4.9% | 1.1% | 0.38% | 0.25% |
| Dec 2025 | 38.9% | 19.8% | 13.3% | 13.3% | 8.1% | 4.8% | 0.93% | 0.37% | 0.37% |
| Jan 2026 | 40.4% | 22.8% | 12.8% | 9.8% | 7.2% | 5.3% | 1.2% | 0.41% | 0.14% |
| Feb 2026 | 37.6% | 23.8% | 14% | 10.4% | 7.8% | 4.6% | 1.3% | 0.36% | 0.12% |
| Mar 2026 | 38.1% | 25% | 13.5% | 10% | 6.8% | 4.8% | 1.4% | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Apr 2026 | 39.5% | 24.8% | 13.6% | 8.9% | 6.8% | 4.8% | 1.1% | 0.37% | 0.12% |
| May 2026 | 38.9% | 24.1% | 13.7% | 8.6% | 7.7% | 4.7% | 1.7% | 0.36% | 0.24% |
| Jun 2026 | 37.9% | 26.3% | 13.8% | 9.2% | 7.1% | 4.1% | 1.1% | 0.31% | 0.21% |
| Jul 2026 | 36% | 24.3% | 15.3% | 10.4% | 7.8% | 4.6% | 1.1% | 0.35% | 0.24% |
| Aug 2026 | 37.7% | 23.6% | 15.5% | 8.6% | 7.9% | 4.6% | 1.7% | 0.36% | 0.12% |
| Sep 2026 | 28.4% | 26.5% | 16.8% | 11.7% | 8.5% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 0.53% | 0.13% |
How has the HazardCo and SiteApp Pro comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- HazardCo was ahead of SiteApp Pro in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, HazardCo’s share of searches among health and safety software in New Zealand moved from 25.8% to 26.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 2.1K to 2K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, SiteApp Pro’s share of searches among health and safety software in New Zealand moved from 14% to 16.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1.1K to 1.3K.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand health and safety software in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, HazardCo gained share of searches among health and safety software in New Zealand, from 23.6% to 26.5%.

In September 2026, SiteApp Pro gained share of searches among health and safety software in New Zealand, from 15.5% to 16.8%.
How are branded searches counted?
6 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using HazardCo’s and SiteApp Pro’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
HazardCo
3 branded search terms
- hazardco
- hazardco app
- hazardco hub
SiteApp Pro
3 branded search terms
- siteapp
- siteapp pro
- siteapppro
Other head-to-heads among health and safety software

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.