NaturalReader vs TTSMaker:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, TTSMaker had more branded searches than NaturalReader among text to speech tools worldwide. TTSMaker had about 301,000 branded searches, while NaturalReader had 60,500. TTSMaker made up 3.8% of all text to speech tool searches we track, and NaturalReader accounted for 0.76%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about text to speech tools, NaturalReader appeared in two of the five answers and TTSMaker in one. NaturalReader was mentioned before TTSMaker in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
TTSMaker, about 5 searches for every 1 for NaturalReader
Who does AI mention more?
NaturalReader, mentioned in 2 of 5 answers, TTSMaker in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
NaturalReader, named ahead of TTSMaker in 2 of 2 answers
Follow NaturalReader vs TTSMaker and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top text to speech tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, NaturalReader was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. TTSMaker was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. NaturalReader was listed before TTSMaker in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
ElevenLabs4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Speechify4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Murf AI2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
NaturalReader2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
TTSMaker1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Play.ht0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Resemble AI0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- LOVO0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
WellSaid0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about text to speech tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which text to speech tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best text to speech tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best text to speech tool for natural sounding speech?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“ai voice generator”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“text to voice app”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 19, 2026.
Is NaturalReader or TTSMaker more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for NaturalReader and TTSMaker by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine text to speech tools we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for TTSMaker, NaturalReader. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | ElevenLabs | Speechify | TTSMaker | Murf AI | NaturalReader | Play.ht | Resemble AI | LOVO | WellSaid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 84.7% | 5.7% | 3.5% | 2.1% | 0.86% | 1.6% | 0.96% | 0.47% | 0.19% |
| Nov 2025 | 85.8% | 4.8% | 3.6% | 2% | 0.88% | 1.3% | 0.98% | 0.48% | 0.16% |
| Dec 2025 | 87.5% | 4.2% | 3.1% | 1.6% | 0.63% | 1.6% | 0.86% | 0.35% | 0.14% |
| Jan 2026 | 87.4% | 5.1% | 2.6% | 1.5% | 0.63% | 1.7% | 0.7% | 0.28% | 0.12% |
| Feb 2026 | 87.4% | 5% | 2.5% | 1.5% | 0.74% | 1.8% | 0.68% | 0.27% | 0.11% |
| Mar 2026 | 87.9% | 5% | 2.5% | 1.3% | 0.76% | 1.8% | 0.46% | 0.23% | 0.09% |
| Apr 2026 | 86.9% | 4.9% | 3% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 0.55% | 0.27% | 0.1% |
| May 2026 | 88.1% | 4.9% | 3.1% | 1.3% | 0.75% | 1.3% | 0.38% | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Jun 2026 | 91.2% | 3.5% | 2.6% | 0.9% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.32% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
| Jul 2026 | 91.9% | 2.9% | 2.6% | 0.91% | 0.53% | 0.72% | 0.27% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
| Aug 2026 | 91.3% | 2.9% | 3.3% | 0.93% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.27% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
| Sep 2026 | 88.8% | 4.9% | 3.8% | 0.89% | 0.76% | 0.41% | 0.31% | 0.12% | 0.06% |
How has the NaturalReader and TTSMaker comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- TTSMaker was ahead of NaturalReader in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, NaturalReader’s share of searches among text to speech tools worldwide moved from 0.86% to 0.76%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 60.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TTSMaker’s share of searches among text to speech tools worldwide moved from 3.5% to 3.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 246K to 301K.
How did search popularity change for text to speech tools worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Speechify overtook TTSMaker to rank 2nd among text to speech tools worldwide, with 4.9% of the searches.

TTSMaker’s share of searches among text to speech tools worldwide has gained ground for 3 months in a row, from 2.6% to 3.8% in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using NaturalReader’s and TTSMaker’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
NaturalReader
1 branded search term
- naturalreader
TTSMaker
1 branded search term
- ttsmaker
Other head-to-heads among text to speech tools

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.