Dearfoams vs EMU Australia:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Dearfoams had more branded searches than EMU Australia among slipper brands worldwide. Dearfoams had about 8,100 branded searches, while EMU Australia had 2,400. Dearfoams made up 0.96% of all slipper brand searches we track, and EMU Australia accounted for 0.28%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about slipper brands, Dearfoams appeared in four of the five answers and EMU Australia in none.
Who do people search for more?
Dearfoams, about 3 searches for every 1 for EMU Australia
Who does AI mention more?
Dearfoams, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, EMU Australia in 0
Who does AI recommend more?
Dearfoams, the only one of the two named
Follow Dearfoams vs EMU Australia and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top slipper brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Dearfoams was mentioned in four out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. EMU Australia did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
UGG1st
Dearfoams2nd
L.L.Bean3rd
Vionic4th
Minnetonka5th
Isotoner6th
Glerups7th
Birkenstock8th
Haflinger8th- +3 more
EMU Australia–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
UGG5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Dearfoams4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Haflinger2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
L.L.Bean2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Vionic2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Birkenstock1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Bombas1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Glerups1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Isotoner1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
EMU Australia0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about slipper brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which slipper brand should I buy?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best slipper brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best slipper brand for keeping feet warm in winter?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“slippers”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“mens slippers”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 25, 2026.
Is Dearfoams or EMU Australia more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Dearfoams and EMU Australia by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 13 slipper brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Dearfoams, EMU Australia. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | UGG | Birkenstock | Bombas | Glerups | Haflinger | L.L.Bean | Vionic | Dearfoams | Isotoner | Minnetonka | Mahabis | Giesswein | EMU Australia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 70.4% | 9.5% | 7.7% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 0.85% | 0.85% | 1.3% | 0.46% | 0.38% | 0.25% |
| Nov 2025 | 72.6% | 5.3% | 11.9% | 2% | 1.3% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 0.72% | 0.59% | 1.3% | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.17% |
| Dec 2025 | 67.9% | 5% | 13.6% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 4.1% | 1.2% | 1% | 0.67% | 1.5% | 0.3% | 0.25% | 0.16% |
| Jan 2026 | 59.8% | 9.8% | 12% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 4.4% | 2% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.6% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 0.21% |
| Feb 2026 | 59.4% | 14.5% | 9.8% | 4.4% | 2% | 2.9% | 2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.6% | 0.71% | 0.48% | 0.21% |
| Mar 2026 | 56% | 20.6% | 7.5% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 0.82% | 0.44% | 0.37% |
| Apr 2026 | 50.1% | 22.4% | 8.2% | 5.5% | 2.5% | 2% | 3% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.59% | 0.59% |
| May 2026 | 49% | 26.9% | 6.6% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 2.9% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.48% | 0.72% |
| Jun 2026 | 46.6% | 31.3% | 6.3% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 1% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.44% | 0.56% |
| Jul 2026 | 51.6% | 28.3% | 5.7% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 2.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.34% | 0.5% |
| Aug 2026 | 58.5% | 21.5% | 6.4% | 3.5% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 0.86% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.86% | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Sep 2026 | 64.9% | 15.9% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.34% | 0.28% |
EMU Australia sells other things too, so only its searches that name this product count here, like “emu slippers”.
How has the Dearfoams and EMU Australia comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Dearfoams was ahead of EMU Australia in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Dearfoams’ share of searches among slipper brands worldwide moved from 0.85% to 0.96%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 12.1K to 8.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, EMU Australia’s share of searches among slipper brands worldwide moved from 0.25% to 0.28%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 3.6K to 2.4K.
How did search popularity change for slipper brands worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Dearfoams rose from 10th to 8th among slipper brands worldwide.

In September 2026, EMU Australia fell from 12th to 13th among slipper brands worldwide.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Dearfoams’ and EMU Australia’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Dearfoams
1 branded search term
- dearfoams
EMU Australia
1 branded search term
- emu slippers
Other head-to-heads among slipper brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.