Mail-Tester vs Mailtrap:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Mail-Tester had more branded searches than Mailtrap among email deliverability testing tools worldwide. Mail-Tester had about 72,700 branded searches, while Mailtrap had 42,300. Mail-Tester made up 16.9% of all email deliverability testing tool searches we track, and Mailtrap accounted for 9.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about email deliverability testing tools, Mail-Tester appeared in four of the five answers and Mailtrap in two. Mail-Tester was mentioned before Mailtrap in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Mail-Tester, about 72% more searches than Mailtrap
Who does AI mention more?
Mail-Tester, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Mailtrap in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Mail-Tester, named ahead of Mailtrap in 3 of 3 answers
Follow Mail-Tester vs Mailtrap and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top email deliverability testing tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Mail-Tester was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Mailtrap was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Mail-Tester was listed before Mailtrap in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
GlockApps1st
Mail-Tester2nd
MailReach3rd
MXToolbox4th
Litmus5th
Mailtrap6th
InboxAlly–
MailMonitor–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Mail-Tester4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
GlockApps4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
MailReach3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
MXToolbox2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Mailtrap2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Litmus2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
InboxAlly0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
MailMonitor0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about email deliverability testing tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which email deliverability testing tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best email deliverability testing tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best email deliverability testing tool for better inbox placement?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“email deliverability tool”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“email spam test”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is Mail-Tester or Mailtrap more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Mail-Tester and Mailtrap by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight email deliverability testing tools we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Mail-Tester, Mailtrap. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | MXToolbox | Mail-Tester | Mailtrap | GlockApps | MailReach | InboxAlly | Litmus | MailMonitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 66.5% | 16.6% | 13.8% | 1.5% | 0.97% | 0.24% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| Nov 2025 | 68.6% | 16.6% | 11.7% | 1.5% | 1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 66.2% | 16.6% | 13.9% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.29% | 0.19% | 0.24% |
| Jan 2026 | 68.3% | 17.1% | 11.8% | 1.2% | 1% | 0.22% | 0.16% | 0.2% |
| Feb 2026 | 68.2% | 17.1% | 11.7% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.24% | 0.16% | 0.2% |
| Mar 2026 | 68.8% | 16.6% | 11.8% | 1.2% | 1% | 0.17% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
| Apr 2026 | 70.5% | 14.4% | 12.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.21% | 0.17% | 0.14% |
| May 2026 | 68.5% | 16.6% | 11.8% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.2% | 0.16% | 0.2% |
| Jun 2026 | 68.3% | 16.7% | 11.7% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.2% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
| Jul 2026 | 68.1% | 17% | 11.7% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| Aug 2026 | 67.1% | 17.6% | 11.6% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.29% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Sep 2026 | 70% | 16.9% | 9.8% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 0.24% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
How has the Mail-Tester and Mailtrap comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Mail-Tester was ahead of Mailtrap in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Mail-Tester’s share of searches among email deliverability testing tools worldwide moved from 16.6% to 16.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 75.3K to 72.7K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Mailtrap’s share of searches among email deliverability testing tools worldwide moved from 13.8% to 9.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 62.4K to 42.3K.
How did search popularity change for email deliverability testing tools worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Mailtrap lost share of searches among email deliverability testing tools worldwide, from 11.6% to 9.8%.

In September 2026, Mail-Tester lost share of searches among email deliverability testing tools worldwide, from 17.6% to 16.9%.
How are branded searches counted?
8 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Mail-Tester’s and Mailtrap’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Mail-Tester
4 branded search terms
- mail-tester
- mail-tester email testing
- mail-tester software
- mailtester
Mailtrap
4 branded search terms
- mailtrap
- mailtrap email sandbox
- mailtrap email testing
- mailtrap io
Other head-to-heads among email deliverability testing tools

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.