Koala vs Mocka:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Mocka had more branded searches than Koala among furniture retailers in Australia. Mocka had about 33,100 branded searches, while Koala had 22,000. Mocka made up 1.3% of all furniture retailer searches we track, and Koala accounted for 0.84%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about furniture retailers, Koala and Mocka each appeared in two of the five answers. Koala and Mocka were each mentioned first in two of the four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Mocka, about 50% more searches than Koala
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 2 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
Each is named first in 2 of 4 answers.
Follow Koala vs Mocka and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top furniture retailers in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Koala was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Mocka was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Koala and Mocka were each listed first in two of the four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Temple & Webster1st
IKEA2nd
King Living3rd
Amart Furniture4th
Castlery5th- Mocka6th
Koala7th
Fantastic Furniture8th
Nick Scali9th
Brosa–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Amart Furniture4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- IKEA3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Temple & Webster3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Fantastic Furniture2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- King Living2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Mocka2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Castlery2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Koala2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Nick Scali1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Brosa0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about furniture retailers
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which furniture store should I buy a sofa from in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best furniture retailers in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best online furniture store in Australia for good quality at a fair price?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“online furniture stores”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“furniture”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 22, 2026.
Is Koala or Mocka more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Koala and Mocka by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten furniture retailers we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.
Share of searches by month for Mocka, Koala. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | IKEA | Fantastic Furniture | Temple & Webster | Amart Furniture | Nick Scali | King Living | Mocka | Castlery | Koala | Brosa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 46.9% | 21% | 14.1% | 10.5% | 3.4% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.09% |
| Nov 2025 | 47.1% | 17.3% | 17.3% | 10.6% | 3.5% | 1.3% | 1% | 1% | 0.72% | 0.09% |
| Dec 2025 | 51.9% | 19.1% | 12.8% | 10.4% | 2.6% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.07% |
| Jan 2026 | 56.1% | 16.9% | 11.3% | 9.2% | 3.4% | 1% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.51% | 0.07% |
| Feb 2026 | 52.9% | 19.4% | 13% | 8.6% | 2.6% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 0.58% | 0.07% |
| Mar 2026 | 51.7% | 19% | 12.7% | 9.5% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.93% | 0.7% | 0.08% |
| Apr 2026 | 56.6% | 17% | 11.4% | 8.5% | 2.8% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.84% | 0.56% | 0.06% |
| May 2026 | 51.6% | 18.9% | 12.7% | 9.5% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.93% | 0.62% | 0.08% |
| Jun 2026 | 46.4% | 20.8% | 13.9% | 10.4% | 4.2% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
| Jul 2026 | 50.9% | 18.7% | 12.5% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.92% | 0.56% | 0.06% |
| Aug 2026 | 51.2% | 18.8% | 12.6% | 9.4% | 3.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.92% | 0.61% | 0.06% |
| Sep 2026 | 46.6% | 21% | 14% | 10.5% | 3.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.84% | 0.07% |
How has the Koala and Mocka comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Mocka was ahead of Koala in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Koala’s share of searches among furniture retailers in Australia moved from 0.63% to 0.84%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 20.2K to 22K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Mocka’s share of searches among furniture retailers in Australia held steady at 1.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 40.5K to 33.1K.
How did search popularity change for Australia furniture retailers in September 2026?
1 change
Estimated monthly branded searches for Mocka in Australia fell 18.3% over 12 measured months, from 40.5K to 33.1K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Koala’s and Mocka’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among furniture retailers
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.