How popular isBlue Nile?
In September 2026, people searched for Blue Nile by name about 193,000 times in the United States, a 7.7% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 5.3% of all United States lab-grown diamond jeweler searches, placing Blue Nile fourth out of 12 jewelers. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about lab-grown diamond jewelers, Blue Nile appeared in three of the five answers and was the fourth most recommended of the 12.
Blue Nile is the fourth most searched of 12 competitors and the fourth most recommended in AI answers.
Brilliant EarthShare of searches 57.4%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
Rare CaratShare of searches 17%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
Frank DarlingShare of searches 7.6%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
Blue NileShare of searches 5.3%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
Grown BrillianceShare of searches 3.6%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 6th
Follow Blue Nile and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top lab-grown diamond jewelers in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Blue Nile was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Blue Nile is the fourth most recommended of the 12.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Brilliant Earth5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Rare Carat3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Blue Nile3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Ritani3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
With Clarity3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Grown Brilliance2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
VRAI1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Clean Origin1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Frank Darling0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Keyzar0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about lab-grown diamond jewelers
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which lab-grown diamond jeweler should I buy from in the US?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best lab-grown diamond jewelers in the US?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best lab-grown diamond jeweler in the US for an engagement ring?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“lab grown diamonds”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“lab grown diamond engagement rings”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United States on October 22, 2026.
Which lab-grown diamond jewelers compete with Blue Nile?
Share of searches by month for Brilliant Earth, Rare Carat, Frank Darling, Blue Nile, Grown Brilliance, Ritani, VRAI. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Brilliant Earth | Rare Carat | Frank Darling | Blue Nile | Grown Brilliance | Ritani | VRAI | Keyzar | Clean Origin | With Clarity | Ada Diamonds | Kimaï |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 58.2% | 13.9% | 5.1% | 8.4% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 3.1% | 2.3% | 0.68% | 1.2% | 0.19% | 0.17% |
| Nov 2025 | 55.4% | 13.4% | 4% | 12.7% | 5.1% | 2.3% | 2.8% | 2% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 0.15% | 0.13% |
| Dec 2025 | 55.1% | 13.3% | 4% | 13.5% | 5% | 2.3% | 2.8% | 1.6% | 1.2% | 0.97% | 0.13% | 0.11% |
| Jan 2026 | 56.7% | 13.7% | 5% | 11.1% | 5.2% | 1.9% | 2.8% | 1.7% | 0.82% | 0.82% | 0.15% | 0.11% |
| Feb 2026 | 49.7% | 12.1% | 5.4% | 19.7% | 4.7% | 2% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.88% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
| Mar 2026 | 48.6% | 11.3% | 5% | 20.8% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 5.6% | 1.5% | 0.55% | 0.82% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| Apr 2026 | 52.6% | 12.5% | 5.6% | 6.7% | 4% | 2.1% | 12.7% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.91% | 0.15% | 0.12% |
| May 2026 | 61.1% | 11.6% | 5.2% | 7.5% | 3.7% | 2% | 5.8% | 1.4% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.14% | 0.09% |
| Jun 2026 | 61.9% | 13.1% | 5.8% | 7.8% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 0.64% | 0.95% | 0.16% | 0.08% |
| Jul 2026 | 62.2% | 12.7% | 5.7% | 8.2% | 3.3% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 0.76% | 0.93% | 0.12% | 0.1% |
| Aug 2026 | 57% | 16.5% | 7.4% | 6.6% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 0.98% | 0.98% | 0.16% | 0.09% |
| Sep 2026 | 57.4% | 17% | 7.6% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1% | 1% | 0.17% | 0.09% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 57.4% | 305K | -2.7% | +0.4 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 17% | 90.5K | 0% | +0.6 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 7.6% | 40.5K | 0% | +0.3 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 5.3% | 28.3K | -21.8% | -1.3 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 3.6% | 19.1K | -1.5% | +0.1 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 2.8% | 15K | -0.99% | +0.1 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 2.3% | 12.4K | -0.56% | +0.1 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 1.6% | 8.3K | -18.6% | -0.3 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 1% | 5.4K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 1% | 5.4K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 0.17% | 880 | 0% | 0 points | |
| 12, held 12th | 0.09% | 480 | 0% | 0 points |
57.4%
Held 1st. 305K estimated branded searches, -2.7% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
17%
Held 2nd. 90.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.6 points.
7.6%
Held 3rd. 40.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
5.3%
Held 4th. 28.3K estimated branded searches, -21.8% vs prior month. Share -1.3 points.
3.6%
Held 5th. 19.1K estimated branded searches, -1.5% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
6.
Ritani2.8%
Held 6th. 15K estimated branded searches, -0.99% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
7.
VRAI2.3%
Held 7th. 12.4K estimated branded searches, -0.56% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
8.
Keyzar1.6%
Held 8th. 8.3K estimated branded searches, -18.6% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
1%
Held 9th. 5.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
10.
With Clarity1%
Held 10th. 5.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
11.
Ada Diamonds0.17%
Held 11th. 880 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
12.
Kimaï0.09%
Held 12th. 480 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Blue Nile and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Blue Nile
16 comparisons
- Blue Nile vs Brilliant Earth
- Blue Nile vs Jared
- Blue Nile vs Kay Jewelers
- Blue Nile vs Tiffany & Co.
- Blue Nile vs Zales
- Blue Nile vs Helzberg Diamonds
- Blue Nile vs Rare Carat
- Blue Nile vs Frank Darling
- Blue Nile vs Grown Brilliance
- Blue Nile vs Ritani
- Blue Nile vs VRAI
- Blue Nile vs Keyzar
- Blue Nile vs Clean Origin
- Blue Nile vs With Clarity
- Ada Diamonds vs Blue Nile
- Blue Nile vs Kimaï
How has branded search demand for Blue Nile changed in the United States over the last 12 months?
4 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Blue Nile in the United States fell from 209K to 193K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Blue Nile’s share of searches among lab-grown diamond jewelers in the United States decreased from 8.4% to 5.3%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Blue Nile’s share of searches among lab-grown diamond jewelers in the United States peaked at 20.8% in March 2026 and was lowest at 5.3% in September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Blue Nile fell from 3rd to 4th among lab-grown diamond jewelers in the United States.
How did search popularity change for United States lab-grown diamond jewelers in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Rare Carat gained share of searches among lab-grown diamond jewelers in the United States, from 16.5% to 17%.

In September 2026, Blue Nile lost share of searches among lab-grown diamond jewelers in the United States, from 6.6% to 5.3%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Clean Origin in the United States rose 50% over 12 measured months, from 3.6K to 5.4K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Frank Darling in the United States rose 49.4% over 12 measured months, from 27.1K to 40.5K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Ritani in the United States rose 16.8% over 12 measured months, from 12.8K to 15K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Kimaï in the United States fell 45.5% over 12 measured months, from 880 to 480 in September 2026.
How are Blue Nile’s branded searches counted?
4 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Blue Nile’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- blue nile
- blue nile diamonds
- blue nile engagement rings
- blue nile jewelry
Do you work for Blue Nile? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does Blue Nile compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jewelry retailers | 6th of 8 | 5.7% | Show ranking |
| Lab-grown diamond jewelers | 4th of 12 | 5.3% | Shown above |

Is Blue Nile your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.