Farah vs Universal Works:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Universal Works had more branded searches than Farah among menswear brands in the United Kingdom. Universal Works had about 22,200 branded searches, while Farah had 3,700. Universal Works made up 3.2% of all menswear brand searches we track, and Farah accounted for 0.53%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about menswear brands, Universal Works appeared in two of the three answers and Farah in none.
Who do people search for more?
Universal Works, about 6 searches for every 1 for Farah
Who does AI mention more?
Universal Works, mentioned in 2 of 3 answers, Farah in 0
Who does AI recommend more?
Universal Works, the only one of the two named
Follow Farah vs Universal Works and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top menswear brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions, Universal Works was mentioned in two out of three: in two of the three ChatGPT answers. Farah did not appear in any of the three answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Charles Tyrwhitt3 of 3Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Reiss3 of 3Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Sunspel2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Universal Works2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Percival2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Private White V.C.2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Moss1 of 3Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Suitsupply1 of 3Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Hawes & Curtis0 of 3Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Farah0 of 3Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answers
See every answer about menswear brands
3 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best menswear brands in the UK?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Where should I buy a good suit in the UK?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which British clothing brands are good for men in their 30s?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“mens clothing”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Searched Google, AI Overview
“menswear”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United Kingdom on October 27, 2026.
Is Farah or Universal Works more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Farah and Universal Works by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 15 menswear brands we track, month by month, from searches in United Kingdom.
Share of searches by month for Universal Works, Farah. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Charles Tyrwhitt | Moss | Hawes & Curtis | T.M.Lewin | Suitsupply | Sunspel | Universal Works | Hackett | Percival | Luke 1977 | Spoke | Reiss | Father Sons | Private White V.C. | Farah |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 46.7% | 17.1% | 9.4% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1% | 1.1% | 0.56% | 0.7% |
| Nov 2025 | 44.9% | 16.5% | 11% | 6% | 3.3% | 4% | 3.3% | 2.3% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.6% | 0.44% | 0.65% |
| Dec 2025 | 43.5% | 15.9% | 10.7% | 5.9% | 3.9% | 4.8% | 3.9% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 0.42% | 0.69% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.2% | 21.5% | 9.6% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 2.9% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 0.86% | 0.92% | 0.7% | 0.72% |
| Feb 2026 | 41.7% | 18.8% | 10.3% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 2.2% | 1.6% | 0.91% | 1.2% | 0.5% | 0.66% |
| Mar 2026 | 42.3% | 18.9% | 10.4% | 5.7% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.93% | 1.2% | 0.33% | 0.69% |
| Apr 2026 | 41.3% | 18.5% | 10.2% | 8.3% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 3% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.91% | 1.2% | 0.49% | 0.76% |
| May 2026 | 48.3% | 17.7% | 7.9% | 6.5% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 0.71% | 1% | 0.31% | 0.49% |
| Jun 2026 | 48.8% | 17.9% | 8% | 6.6% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.88% | 1.1% | 0.32% | 0.49% |
| Jul 2026 | 48.4% | 17.8% | 8% | 6.5% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 1.6% | 0.49% |
| Aug 2026 | 44.3% | 19.9% | 8.9% | 7.3% | 4% | 4% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 0.97% | 0.54% |
| Sep 2026 | 53.2% | 13.1% | 8.7% | 5.9% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 0.78% | 0.77% | 0.64% | 0.53% |
How has the Farah and Universal Works comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Universal Works was ahead of Farah in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Farah’s share of searches among menswear brands in the United Kingdom moved from 0.7% to 0.53%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.5K to 3.7K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Universal Works’ share of searches among menswear brands in the United Kingdom moved from 3.4% to 3.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 22.2K.
How did search popularity change for United Kingdom menswear brands in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Universal Works gained share of searches among menswear brands in the United Kingdom, from 2.7% to 3.2%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Farah in the United Kingdom fell 17.8% over 12 measured months, from 4.5K to 3.7K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Farah’s and Universal Works’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Farah
2 branded search terms
- farah clothing
- farah trousers
Universal Works
1 branded search term
- universal works
Other head-to-heads among menswear brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.