Boh Runga vs Walker & Hall:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Walker & Hall had more branded searches than Boh Runga among jewellery brands in New Zealand. Walker & Hall had about 6,600 branded searches, while Boh Runga had 1,600. Walker & Hall made up 7.7% of all jewellery brand searches we track, and Boh Runga accounted for 1.9%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about jewellery brands, Boh Runga and Walker & Hall each appeared in three of the five answers. Walker & Hall was mentioned before Boh Runga in three out of four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Walker & Hall, about 4 searches for every 1 for Boh Runga
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 3 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
Walker & Hall, named ahead of Boh Runga in 3 of 4 answers
Follow Boh Runga vs Walker & Hall and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top jewellery brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Boh Runga was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Walker & Hall was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Walker & Hall was listed before Boh Runga in three out of four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Michael Hill4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Zoe & Morgan4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Meadowlark4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Walker & Hall3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Boh Runga3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Pandora0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Swarovski0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Tiffany & Co.0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Mejuri0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Thomas Sabo0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about jewellery brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which jewellery brand should I buy in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best jewellery brands in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best jewellery brand in New Zealand for everyday wear?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“jewellery brands nz”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“gold jewellery nz”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 21, 2026.
Is Boh Runga or Walker & Hall more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Boh Runga and Walker & Hall by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten jewellery brands we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for Walker & Hall, Boh Runga. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Michael Hill | Pandora | Swarovski | Tiffany & Co. | Walker & Hall | Zoe & Morgan | Boh Runga | Meadowlark | Mejuri | Thomas Sabo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 43% | 15.6% | 12.9% | 10.7% | 10% | 4.4% | 1.6% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.41% |
| Nov 2025 | 43.2% | 15.7% | 15.2% | 8.8% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 1.7% | 0.7% | 0.76% | 0.39% |
| Dec 2025 | 38.4% | 20.5% | 16.4% | 9.4% | 7.4% | 4% | 2.2% | 0.77% | 0.52% | 0.37% |
| Jan 2026 | 41.5% | 14.3% | 15% | 12.4% | 8% | 4.3% | 2.4% | 0.93% | 0.73% | 0.43% |
| Feb 2026 | 44.9% | 14.2% | 13.3% | 11.1% | 8.6% | 3.8% | 2% | 0.99% | 0.67% | 0.43% |
| Mar 2026 | 38.2% | 12.6% | 16.7% | 11.4% | 8.9% | 7.3% | 2.6% | 1.2% | 0.68% | 0.37% |
| Apr 2026 | 45.2% | 13.5% | 13.7% | 11.1% | 8.7% | 3.9% | 1.7% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.43% |
| May 2026 | 42.4% | 15.7% | 15.6% | 10.4% | 8.1% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 0.86% | 0.39% |
| Jun 2026 | 40.5% | 16.8% | 14.9% | 12% | 7.7% | 3.4% | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.46% |
| Jul 2026 | 38.7% | 15.8% | 14.7% | 11.6% | 7.4% | 6.1% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 0.45% |
| Aug 2026 | 42.4% | 16% | 13.2% | 12.7% | 6.6% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 1.2% | 0.83% | 0.5% |
| Sep 2026 | 40.3% | 16.4% | 14.9% | 12.2% | 7.7% | 4.2% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 0.67% | 0.47% |
How has the Boh Runga and Walker & Hall comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Walker & Hall was ahead of Boh Runga in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Boh Runga’s share of searches among jewellery brands in New Zealand moved from 1.6% to 1.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Walker & Hall’s share of searches among jewellery brands in New Zealand moved from 10% to 7.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 9.9K to 6.6K.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand jewellery brands in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Walker & Hall gained share of searches among jewellery brands in New Zealand, from 6.6% to 7.7%.

In September 2026, Boh Runga lost share of searches among jewellery brands in New Zealand, from 2.9% to 1.9%.
How are branded searches counted?
4 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Boh Runga’s and Walker & Hall’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Boh Runga
1 branded search term
- boh runga
Walker & Hall
3 branded search terms
- walker & hall
- walker hall
- walkerhall
Other head-to-heads among jewellery brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.