Architectus vs Warren and Mahoney:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Warren and Mahoney had more branded searches than Architectus among architecture firms in New Zealand. Warren and Mahoney had about 2,600 branded searches, while Architectus had 890. Warren and Mahoney made up 32.9% of all architecture firm searches we track, and Architectus accounted for 11.3%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about architecture firms, Warren and Mahoney appeared in three of the four answers and Architectus in two. Warren and Mahoney was mentioned before Architectus in every answer.
Who do people search for more?
Warren and Mahoney, about 3 searches for every 1 for Architectus
Who does AI mention more?
Warren and Mahoney, mentioned in 3 of 4 answers, Architectus in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Warren and Mahoney, named ahead of Architectus in every answer
Follow Architectus vs Warren and Mahoney and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top architecture firms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, Warren and Mahoney was mentioned in three out of four: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in the Google AI Overview. Architectus was mentioned in two out of four: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. Warren and Mahoney was listed before Architectus in every answer.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Warren and Mahoney3 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Jasmax3 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Cheshire Architects3 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Fearon Hay2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Architectus2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Studio Pacific Architecture2 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Stevens Lawson1 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Athfield Architects0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Woods Bagot0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
See every answer about architecture firms
4 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which architecture firm should I hire in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best architecture firms in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best architecture firm in New Zealand for a building project?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“architects auckland”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Searched Google, AI Overview
“architecture firms nz”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 20, 2026.
Is Architectus or Warren and Mahoney more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Architectus and Warren and Mahoney by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine architecture firms we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for Warren and Mahoney, Architectus. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Warren and Mahoney | Fearon Hay | Jasmax | Architectus | Cheshire Architects | Athfield Architects | Stevens Lawson | Studio Pacific Architecture | Woods Bagot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 34.2% | 13.7% | 12.5% | 9.6% | 11.6% | 6.3% | 4.5% | 4.2% | 3.4% |
| Nov 2025 | 31.8% | 17.6% | 13.1% | 10% | 10% | 5.4% | 3.9% | 5.4% | 2.9% |
| Dec 2025 | 38% | 15.9% | 11% | 8.6% | 10.3% | 4.5% | 3.5% | 4.5% | 3.7% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.4% | 13.5% | 12.2% | 9.5% | 9.4% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 5.1% | 2.7% |
| Feb 2026 | 33.5% | 10.3% | 12.5% | 9.4% | 16.8% | 6.2% | 3.6% | 5% | 2.7% |
| Mar 2026 | 34.7% | 12.4% | 12.8% | 8.6% | 10.5% | 7.1% | 5% | 5.7% | 3.1% |
| Apr 2026 | 35.7% | 15.2% | 10.9% | 8.2% | 9.9% | 8.1% | 4.7% | 4.4% | 2.9% |
| May 2026 | 35.8% | 12.8% | 13.5% | 8.9% | 10.9% | 5.9% | 4.2% | 4.8% | 3.2% |
| Jun 2026 | 39.7% | 12.9% | 9.8% | 8.9% | 10.9% | 5.9% | 3.1% | 4.8% | 4% |
| Jul 2026 | 38.4% | 10.9% | 11.6% | 12.1% | 10.6% | 5.8% | 3.7% | 3.8% | 3.1% |
| Aug 2026 | 32.6% | 15% | 12.2% | 11% | 11% | 6% | 3.5% | 6% | 2.6% |
| Sep 2026 | 32.9% | 13.1% | 12.3% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 6.1% | 5.1% | 4.9% | 3.3% |
How has the Architectus and Warren and Mahoney comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Warren and Mahoney was ahead of Architectus in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Architectus’ share of searches among architecture firms in New Zealand moved from 9.6% to 11.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 730 to 890.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Warren and Mahoney’s share of searches among architecture firms in New Zealand moved from 34.2% to 32.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 2.6K.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand architecture firms in September 2026?
1 change

Estimated monthly branded searches for Architectus in New Zealand rose 21.9% over 12 measured months, from 730 to 890 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
5 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Architectus’ and Warren and Mahoney’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Architectus
2 branded search terms
- architectus
- architectus architects
Warren and Mahoney
3 branded search terms
- warren and mahoney
- warren and mahoney architects
- warrenandmahoney
Other head-to-heads among architecture firms

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.