Brandwave

Podia vs Wild Apricot:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Podia had more branded searches than Wild Apricot among membership platforms worldwide. Podia had about 49,500 branded searches, while Wild Apricot had 9,900. Podia made up 0.85% of all membership platform searches we track, and Wild Apricot accounted for 0.17%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about membership platforms, Podia appeared in two of the five answers and Wild Apricot in one. Podia was mentioned before Wild Apricot in two out of three answers that named either.

Among membership platforms worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Podia, about 5 searches for every 1 for Wild Apricot

Podia 49.5K searchesWild Apricot 9.9K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Podia, mentioned in 2 of 5 answers, Wild Apricot in 1

Podia in 2 of 5Wild Apricot in 1 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Podia, named ahead of Wild Apricot in 2 of 3 answers

Podia first in 2Wild Apricot first in 1

Follow Podia vs Wild Apricot and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top membership platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Podia was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Wild Apricot was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Podia was listed before Wild Apricot in two out of three answers that named either.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Circle1st
  2. Mighty Networks2nd
  3. Skool3rd
  4. Patreon4th
  5. MemberPress5th
  6. Kajabi6th
  7. Podia7th
  8. Wild Apricot8th
  9. Substack–
  10. Memberful–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Patreon3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Kajabi3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Skool3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Mighty Networks3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Circle3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • MemberPress3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Podia2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Wild Apricot1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Substack0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Memberful0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about membership platforms

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 19, 2026.

Is Podia or Wild Apricot more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Podia and Wild Apricot by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten membership platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Podia and Wild Apricot among membership platforms worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Podia, Wild Apricot. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthPatreonSubstackKajabiPodiaSkoolMighty NetworksWild ApricotCircleMemberPressMemberful
Oct 202568.6%25.8%2.8%1.2%0.37%0.68%0.25%0.14%0.2%0.05%
Nov 202568.6%25.8%2.8%1.2%0.45%0.55%0.25%0.11%0.2%0.04%
Dec 202565.1%29.9%2.6%0.96%0.35%0.53%0.19%0.09%0.16%0.05%
Jan 202665%30%2.6%0.96%0.35%0.53%0.24%0.09%0.16%0.04%
Feb 202664.5%29.8%3.2%0.95%0.43%0.52%0.23%0.1%0.16%0.05%
Mar 202665.6%30.2%2.2%0.79%0.36%0.43%0.19%0.09%0.13%0.04%
Apr 202661.1%34.2%2.5%0.9%0.41%0.49%0.18%0.1%0.12%0.03%
May 202665.8%30.1%2.2%0.8%0.36%0.36%0.16%0.07%0.09%0.03%
Jun 202665.7%30.6%1.8%0.8%0.36%0.36%0.16%0.07%0.09%0.03%
Jul 202661.3%34.6%2%0.91%0.41%0.41%0.18%0.07%0.08%0.03%
Aug 202661.7%35%1.7%0.75%0.34%0.27%0.15%0.07%0.07%0.02%
Sep 202657.3%39.3%1.5%0.85%0.38%0.31%0.17%0.06%0.06%0.03%

How has the Podia and Wild Apricot comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Podia was ahead of Wild Apricot in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Podia’s share of searches among membership platforms worldwide moved from 1.2% to 0.85%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 60.5K to 49.5K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Wild Apricot’s share of searches among membership platforms worldwide moved from 0.25% to 0.17%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 12.1K to 9.9K.

How did search popularity change for membership platforms worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes

  1. Estimated monthly branded searches for Podia worldwide fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 60.5K to 49.5K in September 2026.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Wild Apricot worldwide fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 12.1K to 9.9K in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Podia’s and Wild Apricot’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Podia

1 branded search term

  • podia

Wild Apricot

1 branded search term

  • wild apricot

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among membership platforms

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.

Start free