OpenEvidence vs Wolters Kluwer:Which is searched more?
In September 2026, OpenEvidence had more branded searches than Wolters Kluwer among clinical decision support platforms worldwide. OpenEvidence had about 1.8 million branded searches, while Wolters Kluwer had 135,000. OpenEvidence made up 51.5% of all clinical decision support platform searches we track, and Wolters Kluwer accounted for 3.8%. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Follow OpenEvidence vs Wolters Kluwer and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Is OpenEvidence or Wolters Kluwer more popular in search?
Compare the platforms clinicians check decisions against. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.
Share of searches by month for OpenEvidence, Wolters Kluwer. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | OpenEvidence | UpToDate | Elsevier | Isabel | Wolters Kluwer | DynaMed | BMJ Best Practice | VisualDx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 38.8% | 38.8% | 11.7% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 1.1% | 0.58% | 0.39% |
| Nov 2025 | 34% | 41.5% | 12.5% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 0.92% | 0.5% | 0.41% |
| Dec 2025 | 37.8% | 37.8% | 11.4% | 6.2% | 5.1% | 0.84% | 0.56% | 0.37% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.1% | 39.1% | 9.6% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 0.32% |
| Feb 2026 | 42% | 34.4% | 10.4% | 4.6% | 6.9% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.34% |
| Mar 2026 | 43.3% | 35.3% | 10.6% | 3.9% | 4.8% | 0.78% | 0.96% | 0.35% |
| Apr 2026 | 48.8% | 32.5% | 9.8% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 0.72% | 0.59% | 0.32% |
| May 2026 | 47.6% | 31.7% | 9.6% | 5.2% | 4.3% | 0.7% | 0.57% | 0.31% |
| Jun 2026 | 49.1% | 32.7% | 8% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 0.59% | 0.4% | 0.32% |
| Jul 2026 | 53.5% | 29.3% | 7.2% | 4.8% | 3.9% | 0.53% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Aug 2026 | 52.6% | 28.8% | 8.7% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Sep 2026 | 51.5% | 28.2% | 10.4% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 0.63% | 0.51% | 0.34% |
How has the OpenEvidence and Wolters Kluwer comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- OpenEvidence was ahead of Wolters Kluwer in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OpenEvidence’s share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide moved from 38.8% to 51.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1.2M to 1.8M.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Wolters Kluwer’s share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide moved from 4.3% to 3.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 135K.
How did search popularity change for clinical decision support platforms worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, OpenEvidence lost share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide, from 52.6% to 51.5%.
Wolters Kluwer’s share of searches among clinical decision support platforms worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 4.4% to 3.8% in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using OpenEvidence’s and Wolters Kluwer’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
OpenEvidence
1 branded search term
- openevidence
Wolters Kluwer
1 branded search term
- wolters kluwer
Other head-to-heads among clinical decision support platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.